Suppr超能文献

在一级创伤中心筛查亲密伴侣暴力的障碍和促进因素。

Barriers and facilitators to screening for intimate partner violence at a level 1 trauma center.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2024 Nov;176(5):1525-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.033. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem that is associated with substantial health sequelae, including traumatic injury. Surgical professional societies recommend universal intimate partner violence screening in patients presenting after trauma, but this recommendation is not uniformly implemented. We designed and implemented a quality improvement project at our institution in July 2020 to enhance intimate partner violence screening. Although screening rates improved, they remained suboptimal. Therefore, we sought to examine barriers and facilitators to intimate partner violence screening from trauma clinicians' perspectives.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth, semistructured interviews to understand the perspectives and experiences of trauma clinicians conducting intimate partner violence screening. A constructivist paradigm informed our study whereby our data collection approaches aimed to understand intimate partner violence screening from the perspectives of those tasked with implementing screening within real-world clinical settings. We used thematic analysis to analyze our data and generate themes related to barriers and facilitators to screening.

RESULTS

We conducted interviews with 12 resident physicians and 2 advance practice providers. We identified 6 themes, 3 reflecting facilitator themes as (1) standardized education and workflow, (2) benefits of interdisciplinary teamwork, and (3) context of screening, and 3 reflecting barrier themes as (1) lack of time, (2) language misinterpretation, and (3) perceived inappropriateness of universal screening.

CONCLUSION

Trauma clinicians described multiple facilitators and barriers to screening for intimate partner violence following traumatic injury, some of which were unique to the trauma setting. Projects seeking to achieve universal screening following traumatic injury may benefit from accounting for these factors when designing interventions.

摘要

背景

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个严重的公共卫生问题,与包括创伤在内的大量健康后果有关。外科专业协会建议在创伤后就诊的患者中进行普遍的亲密伴侣暴力筛查,但这一建议并未得到统一实施。我们于 2020 年 7 月在我们的机构中设计并实施了一项质量改进项目,以加强亲密伴侣暴力筛查。尽管筛查率有所提高,但仍不理想。因此,我们试图从创伤临床医生的角度探讨亲密伴侣暴力筛查的障碍和促进因素。

研究设计

我们进行了一项定性研究,采用深入的半结构化访谈,以了解进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查的创伤临床医生的观点和经验。我们的研究采用了建构主义范式,我们的数据收集方法旨在从负责在现实临床环境中实施筛查的人员的角度理解亲密伴侣暴力筛查。我们使用主题分析来分析我们的数据,并生成与筛查障碍和促进因素相关的主题。

结果

我们对 12 名住院医师和 2 名高级实践提供者进行了访谈。我们确定了 6 个主题,其中 3 个反映了促进因素主题,包括(1)标准化教育和工作流程,(2)跨学科团队合作的益处,以及(3)筛查背景,以及 3 个反映障碍主题,包括(1)缺乏时间,(2)语言误解,以及(3)普遍筛查的不适当性。

结论

创伤临床医生描述了在创伤后筛查亲密伴侣暴力的多个障碍和促进因素,其中一些因素是创伤环境所特有的。在设计干预措施时,旨在实现创伤后普遍筛查的项目可能会受益于考虑这些因素。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Surgeon and advocate: identifying intimate partner violence from craniomaxillofacial injuries.外科医生和倡导者:从颅面损伤识别亲密伴侣暴力。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023 May;135(5):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
9
Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies.人口研究:便利抽样策略。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Aug;36(4):373-374. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验