• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意义的主要成分,再探讨。

The principal components of meaning, revisited.

作者信息

Westbury Chris, Yang Michelle, Anderson Kris

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, P220 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.

Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Ave, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):203-225. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02551-y. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-024-02551-y
PMID:39174751
Abstract

Osgood, Suci, and Tannebaum were the first to attempt to identify the principal components of semantics using dimensional reduction of a high-dimensional model of semantics constructed from human judgments of word relatedness. Modern word-embedding models analyze patterns of words to construct higher dimensional models of semantics that can be similarly subjected to dimensional reduction. Hollis and Westbury characterized the first eight principal components (PCs) of a word-embedding model by correlating them with several well-known lexical measures, such as logged word frequency, age of acquisition, valence, arousal, dominance, and concreteness. The results show some clear differentiation of interpretation between the PCs. Here, we extend this work by analyzing a larger word-embedding matrix using semantic measures initially derived from subjective inspection of the PCs. We then use quantitative analysis to confirm the utility of these subjective measures for predicting PC values and cross-validate them on two word-embedding matrices developed on distinct corpora. Several semantic and word class measures are strongly predictive of early PC values, including first-person and second-person verbs, personal relevance of abstract and concrete words, affect terms, and names of places and people. The predictors of the lowest magnitude PCs generalized well to word-embedding matrices constructed from separate corpora, including matrices constructed using different word-embedding methods. The predictive categories we describe are consistent with Wittgenstein's argument that an autonomous level of social interaction grounds linguistic meaning.

摘要

奥斯古德、苏西和坦纳鲍姆率先尝试通过对基于人类词语关联性判断构建的高维语义模型进行降维,来识别语义的主要成分。现代词嵌入模型分析词语模式,以构建可同样进行降维的更高维语义模型。霍利斯和韦斯特伯里通过将词嵌入模型的前八个主成分(PCs)与一些知名的词汇度量(如对数词频、习得年龄、效价、唤醒度、支配性和具体性)进行关联,对这些主成分进行了特征描述。结果显示,各主成分之间在解释上存在一些明显差异。在此,我们通过使用最初从对主成分的主观检查中得出的语义度量来分析一个更大的词嵌入矩阵,扩展了这项工作。然后,我们使用定量分析来确认这些主观度量在预测主成分值方面的效用,并在基于不同语料库开发的两个词嵌入矩阵上对它们进行交叉验证。一些语义和词类度量对早期主成分值具有很强的预测性,包括第一人称和第二人称动词、抽象词和具体词的个人相关性、情感术语以及地点和人物的名称。最低量级主成分的预测指标能够很好地推广到由单独语料库构建的词嵌入矩阵,包括使用不同词嵌入方法构建的矩阵。我们所描述的预测类别与维特根斯坦的观点一致,即社会互动的自主层面是语言意义的基础。

相似文献

1
The principal components of meaning, revisited.意义的主要成分,再探讨。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):203-225. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02551-y. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics.意义的原则:从语义共现模型中提取语义维度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1744-1756. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2.
3
The Nature of Word Associations in Sentence Contexts.句子语境中的词汇联想的本质。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(2):104-110. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000547. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
4
It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.一切都在于呈现方式:语境效价、唤醒水平和具体性对视觉单词加工的影响。
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Examining assortativity in the mental lexicon: Evidence from word associations.审视心理词库中的搭配性:来自词语联想的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1717-24. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0832-5.
6
The interpretation of dream meaning: Resolving ambiguity using Latent Semantic Analysis in a small corpus of text.梦的意义解读:在一小部分文本语料库中使用潜在语义分析解决歧义。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Nov;56:178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
7
Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and abstractions: local fMRI activity indexes semantics, not lexical categories.名词、动词、宾语、动作及抽象概念:局部功能磁共振成像活动反映的是语义,而非词汇类别。
Brain Lang. 2014 May;132(100):28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
8
Arbitrary symbolism in natural language revisited: when word forms carry meaning.重新审视自然语言中的任意符号:当词形承载意义时。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042286. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
9
Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.融入语义空间:一种以歧义为焦点的词义获取理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):411-427. doi: 10.1177/1745691619885860. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
A Constant Error, Revisited: A New Explanation of the Halo Effect.再探恒定误差:光环效应的新解释
Cogn Sci. 2024 Dec;48(12):e70022. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70022.

本文引用的文献

1
Wriggly, squiffy, lummox, and boobs: What makes some words funny?扭扭歪歪、歪七扭八、蠢笨、胸部:是什么让一些词变得有趣?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):97-123. doi: 10.1037/xge0000467. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
2
Conceptualizing syntactic categories as semantic categories: Unifying part-of-speech identification and semantics using co-occurrence vector averaging.将句法范畴概念化为语义范畴:使用共现向量平均统一词性识别和语义。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1371-1398. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1118-4.
3
The English Lexicon Project.英语词汇项目
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03193014.
4
Topics in semantic representation.语义表征的主题。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):211-44. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.211.
5
Word frequency effects in high-dimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach.
Behav Res Methods. 2006 May;38(2):190-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03192768.