Wound closure techniques for spinoplastic surgery: a review of the literature.

PURPOSE

The approach to skin closure in spinal surgery is dependent on surgeon preference and experience. Wound complications, including dehiscence and surgical site infection (SSI), are common following spine surgery. The authors reviewed various wound closure techniques employed in spinal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify articles comparing wound closure techniques after posterior spinal surgery. Articles that employed experimental or observational cohort study designs and reported rates of SSI, dehiscence, or scarring following spinal surgery were included.

RESULTS

Eight studies examining closure techniques of the skin were identified: five retrospective cohort studies and three randomized-controlled trials. No differences in the incidence of SSI were reported based on suture technique, although staples were associated with higher SSI rates in single level spinal fusion, and barbed suture resulted in decreased wound complications. The use of intracutaneous sutures was associated with a higher incidence of wound dehiscence when compared to tension-relieving far-near near-far suture (FNS) and far-near near-far interrupted point (FNP) sutures. However, the latter two also resulted in the highest rates of delayed wound healing (i.e., time to fully heal). Modified Allgöwer-Donati suture (MADS) resulted in smaller scar area when compared to vertical mattress suture.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences exist in wound healing when comparing suture techniques in spinal surgery. Surgical staples allow for faster closing time, but are also associated with higher wound complications. Intracutaneous sutures appear to have higher rates of dehiscence compared to vertical mattress suture but display faster wound healing. Future studies are necessary to elucidate contributory factors, including local ischemia and changes in tensile forces.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.