Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助血管手术:文献综述、临床应用及未来展望。

Robot-assisted vascular surgery: literature review, clinical applications, and future perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 23;18(1):328. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02087-2.

Abstract

Although robot-assisted surgical procedures using the da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) have been performed in more than 13 million procedures worldwide over the last two decades, the vascular surgical community has yet to fully embrace this approach (Intuitive Surgical Investor Presentation Q3 (2023) https://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/static-files/dd0f7e46-db67-4f10-90d9-d826df00554e . Accessed February 22, 2024). In the meantime, endovascular procedures revolutionized vascular care, serving as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open surgery. In the pursuit of a percutaneous approach, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and fewer perioperative complications, the long-term durability of open surgical vascular reconstruction has been compromised (in Lancet 365:2179-2186, 2005; Patel in Lancet 388:2366-2374, 2016; Wanhainen in Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 57:8-93, 2019). The underlying question is whether the robotic-assisted laparoscopic vascular surgical approaches could deliver the robustness and longevity of open vascular surgical reconstruction, but with a minimally invasive delivery system. In the meantime, other surgical specialties have embraced robot-assisted laparoscopic technology and mastered the essential vascular skillsets along with minimally invasive robotic surgery. For example, surgical procedures such as renal transplantation, lung transplantation, and portal vein reconstruction are routinely being performed with robotic assistance that includes major vascular anastomoses (Emerson in J Heart Lung Transplant 43:158-161, 2024; Fei in J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 9, 2023; Tzvetanov in Transplantation 106:479-488, 2022; Slagter in Int J Surg 99, 2022). Handling and dissection of major vascular structures come with the inherent risk of vascular injury, perhaps the most feared complication during such robotic procedures, possibly requiring emergent vascular surgical consultation. In this review article, we describe the impact of a minimally invasive, robotic approach covering the following topics: a brief history of robotic surgery, components and benefits of the robotic system as compared to laparoscopy, current literature on "vascular" applications of the robotic system, evolving training pathways and future perspectives.

摘要

虽然达芬奇机器人系统(直觉外科公司,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)辅助手术在过去二十年中已经在全球范围内进行了超过 1300 万例,但血管外科学术领域尚未完全接受这种方法(直觉外科公司 2023 年第三季度投资者报告 https://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/static-files/dd0f7e46-db67-4f10-90d9-d826df00554e。访问日期:2024 年 2 月 22 日)。在此期间,血管内介入治疗彻底改变了血管治疗,成为传统开放手术的微创替代方法。为了实现经皮入路、缩短术后住院时间和减少围手术期并发症,开放血管重建的长期耐久性受到了影响(在《柳叶刀》365:2179-2186, 2005 年;Patel 在《柳叶刀》388:2366-2374, 2016 年;Wanhainen 在《欧洲血管和腔内血管外科学杂志》57:8-93, 2019 年)。根本问题是,达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜血管手术方法是否可以提供开放血管重建的稳健性和耐久性,但采用微创输送系统。与此同时,其他外科专业已经接受了机器人辅助腹腔镜技术,并掌握了微创机器人手术相关的基本血管技能。例如,肾移植、肺移植和门静脉重建等手术通常都采用机器人辅助进行,包括主要血管吻合(Emerson 在《心脏和肺移植杂志》43:158-161, 2024 年;Fei 在《血管外科学病例创新技术》9 期,2023 年;Tzvetanov 在《移植学》106:479-488, 2022 年;Slagter 在《国际外科学杂志》99 期,2022 年)。处理和解剖大血管结构存在血管损伤的固有风险,这可能是此类机器人手术中最可怕的并发症,可能需要紧急血管外科会诊。在这篇综述文章中,我们将描述微创机器人方法的影响,涵盖以下主题:机器人手术的简要历史、机器人系统与腹腔镜相比的组成部分和优势、机器人系统在“血管”方面的当前文献、不断发展的培训途径和未来展望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f7/11341614/b91b50b61baf/11701_2024_2087_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验