Suppr超能文献

当前和新兴微创机器人手术平台的评估状况。

Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms.

机构信息

The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Marks Hospital, London, UK.

Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Intervention and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):554-585. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10554-4. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rapid adoption of robotics within minimally invasive surgical specialties has also seen an explosion of new technology including multi- and single port, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), endoluminal and "on-demand" platforms. This review aims to evaluate the validation status of current and emerging MIS robotic platforms, using the IDEAL Framework.

METHODS

A scoping review exploring robotic minimally invasive surgical devices, technology and systems in use or being developed was performed, including general surgery, gynaecology, urology and cardiothoracics. Systems operating purely outside the abdomen or thorax and endoluminal or natural orifice platforms were excluded. PubMed, Google Scholar, journal reports and information from the public domain were collected. Each company was approached via email for a virtual interview to discover more about the systems and to quality check data. The IDEAL Framework is an internationally accepted tool to evaluate novel surgical technology, consisting of four stages: idea, development/exploration, assessment, and surveillance. An IDEAL stage, synonymous with validation status in this review, was assigned by reviewing the published literature.

RESULTS

21 companies with 23 different robotic platforms were identified for data collection, 13 with national and/or international regulatory approval. Of the 17 multiport systems, 1 is fully evaluated at stage 4, 2 are stage 3, 6 stage 2b, 2 at stage 2a, 2 stage 1, and 4 at the pre-IDEAL stage 0. Of the 6 single-port systems none have been fully evaluated with 1 at stage 3, 3 at stage 1 and 2 at stage 0.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of existing robotic platforms are currently at the preclinical to developmental and exploratory stage of evaluation. Using the IDEAL framework will ensure that emerging robotic platforms are fully evaluated with long-term data, to inform the surgical workforce and ensure patient safety.

摘要

背景

微创外科专业对机器人技术的快速采用也见证了新技术的爆炸式增长,包括多端口和单端口、自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)、内镜和“按需”平台。本研究旨在使用 IDEAL 框架评估当前和新兴的微创机器人平台的验证状态。

方法

对正在使用或正在开发的机器人微创外科设备、技术和系统进行了范围界定综述,包括普通外科、妇科、泌尿科和心胸外科。排除仅在腹部或胸部以外操作的系统以及内镜或自然腔道平台。收集了 PubMed、Google Scholar、期刊报告和公共领域的信息。通过电子邮件联系每家公司进行虚拟访谈,以了解更多有关系统的信息并对数据进行质量检查。IDEAL 框架是评估新外科技术的国际公认工具,由四个阶段组成:理念、开发/探索、评估和监测。在本综述中,将 IDEAL 阶段赋予与验证状态同义的含义,通过查阅已发表的文献进行评估。

结果

确定了 21 家公司的 23 种不同的机器人平台进行数据收集,其中 13 家具有国家和/或国际监管批准。在 17 个多端口系统中,1 个完全在第 4 阶段进行了评估,2 个在第 3 阶段,6 个在第 2b 阶段,2 个在第 2a 阶段,2 个在第 1 阶段,4 个在第 0 阶段。在 6 个单端口系统中,没有一个完全进行了评估,其中 1 个处于第 3 阶段,3 个处于第 1 阶段,2 个处于第 0 阶段。

结论

大多数现有的机器人平台目前处于临床前到开发和探索评估阶段。使用 IDEAL 框架将确保新兴的机器人平台得到充分评估,并提供长期数据,为外科医生提供信息并确保患者安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2d/10830826/d057bdd62c15/464_2023_10554_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验