Yu Yang, Wu Bing, Song Kai, Song Keran, Chi Pengfei, Liu Haoming, Wang Zheng
Department of Orthopedics, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100071, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 15;38(8):923-928. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404112.
To compare the effectiveness of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement through different surgical approaches and to guide the clinical selection of appropriate robot-assisted surgical approaches.
The clinical data of 14 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral diseases who met the selection criteria between January 2023 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and all of them underwent pedicle screw placement under assistant of the Mazor X spinal surgery robot through different surgical approaches. The patients were divided into posterior median approach (PMA) group ( =6) and intermuscular approach (IMA) group ( =8) according to the surgical approaches, and there was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, disease type, and fixed segment between the two groups ( >0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, screw-related complications, and reoperation rate were recorded and compared between the two groups; the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw were measured based on X-ray films at immediate after operation.
There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( >0.05). There was no screw-related complication such as nerve injury in both groups, and no patients underwent secondary surgery. At immediate after operation, the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw in the IMA group were significantly greater than those in the PMA group ( <0.05).
There are differences in the position and inclination angle of screws placed with robot-assisted surgery through different surgical approaches, which may be due to the obstruction of the screw path by soft tissues such as skin and muscles. When using spinal robot-assisted surgery, selecting the appropriate surgical approach for different diseases can make the treatment more reasonable and effective.
比较脊柱机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉置入不同手术入路的有效性,为临床选择合适的机器人辅助手术入路提供指导。
回顾性分析2023年1月至2023年8月符合入选标准的14例胸腰椎疾病患者的临床资料,所有患者均在Mazor X脊柱手术机器人辅助下经不同手术入路行椎弓根螺钉置入。根据手术入路将患者分为后正中入路(PMA)组(n = 6)和肌间隙入路(IMA)组(n = 8),两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、疾病类型及固定节段方面差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、螺钉相关并发症及再次手术率;术后即刻根据X线片测量螺钉的倾斜角度、螺钉与中线的距离及螺钉的尾侧倾斜角度。
两组患者手术时间和术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组均未出现神经损伤等螺钉相关并发症,且无患者接受二次手术。术后即刻,IMA组螺钉的倾斜角度、螺钉与中线的距离及螺钉的尾侧倾斜角度均显著大于PMA组(P < 0.05)。
脊柱机器人辅助手术经不同手术入路置入螺钉的位置和倾斜角度存在差异,可能与皮肤、肌肉等软组织对螺钉路径的阻挡有关。在使用脊柱机器人辅助手术时,针对不同疾病选择合适的手术入路可使治疗更加合理有效。