Suppr超能文献

伦敦腹主动脉瘤筛查的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面调查。

Barriers and facilitators of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in London: A cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

McKay Ellie, Wong Joy, Ward Stella, Ruwende Josephine, Kerrison Robert

机构信息

NHS England (London), London, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2025 Mar;32(1):53-56. doi: 10.1177/09691413241276187. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this research was to identify patient barriers and facilitators of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in London.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to 4211 adults, who had been invited for AAA screening in 2023. Barriers and facilitators were identified by comparing responses between attenders and non-attenders, using univariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

271 surveys were returned. Attendance was higher among respondents with a body mass index (BMI) > 25 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.72, 95% CIs [1.15, 6.46];  < 0.05) and those with one or more comorbidities (OR: 3.82, 95% CIs [1.63, 8.98];  < 0.01), but lower among those who had not visited a healthcare appointment within the past 6 months (OR: 0.41, 95% CIs [0.18, 0.94]). Attendance was also lower among those who believe screening is only useful for people with symptoms (OR: 0.37; 95% CIs [0.16, 0.89];  < 0.05), find it difficult to make time for medical appointments (OR: 0.25, 95% CIs [0.10, 0.60];  < 0.01), find it difficult to get to medical appointments (OR: 0.40, 95% CIs [0.17, 0.91];  < 0.05), have more important medical problems to worry about (OR: 0.28, 95% CIs [0.12, 0.64];  < 0.01), cannot afford to travel to medical appointments (OR: 0.16, 95% CIs [0.07, 0.38];  < 0.001), need help getting to appointments (OR: 0.33, 95% CIs [0.13, 0.86];  < 0.05), have caring responsibilities (OR: 0.15, 95% CIs [0.06, 0.34];  < 0.001), and forget about appointments (OR: 0.21, 95% CIs [0.09, 0.49];  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides suggestive data on characteristics that might be associated with not attending AAA screening in London. The study design limitations mean that further work is required to evaluate these characteristics more reliably.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定伦敦腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查中患者面临的障碍和促进因素。

方法

对2023年受邀参加AAA筛查的4211名成年人进行了一项调查。通过单因素逻辑回归比较参加者和未参加者的回答,确定障碍和促进因素。

结果

共收回271份调查问卷。体重指数(BMI)>25的受访者(优势比[OR]:2.72,95%置信区间[CI][1.15,6.46];<0.05)以及患有一种或多种合并症的受访者(OR:3.82,95%CI[1.63,8.98];<0.01)的参与率较高,但在过去6个月内未就诊的受访者中参与率较低(OR:0.41,95%CI[0.18,0.94])。认为筛查仅对有症状的人有用的受访者(OR:0.37;95%CI[0.16,0.89];<0.05)、难以抽出时间就医的受访者(OR:0.25,95%CI[0.10,0.60];<0.01)、难以前往就医的受访者(OR:0.40,95%CI[0.17,0.91];<0.05)、有更重要的医疗问题需要担心的受访者(OR:0.28,95%CI[0.12,0.64];<0.01)、负担不起前往就医的交通费用的受访者(OR:0.16,95%CI[0.07,0.38];<0.001)、需要帮助前往就医的受访者(OR:0.33,95%CI[0.13,0.86];<0.05)、有护理责任的受访者(OR:0.15,95%CI[0.06,0.34];<0.001)以及忘记预约的受访者(OR:0.21,95%CI[0.09,0.49];<0.001)的参与率也较低。

结论

本研究提供了关于可能与伦敦未参加AAA筛查相关的特征的提示性数据。研究设计的局限性意味着需要进一步开展工作以更可靠地评估这些特征。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in London: A cross-sectional survey.
J Med Screen. 2025 Mar;32(1):53-56. doi: 10.1177/09691413241276187. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
4
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5(5):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub4.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

3
Editor's Choice - Inequalities in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening in England: Effects of Social Deprivation and Ethnicity.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;53(6):837-843. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Reasons for non-participation in population-based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):481-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9434. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
6
Uptake of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. A cohort study.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jun;45(6):610-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验