• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦敦腹主动脉瘤筛查的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面调查。

Barriers and facilitators of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in London: A cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

McKay Ellie, Wong Joy, Ward Stella, Ruwende Josephine, Kerrison Robert

机构信息

NHS England (London), London, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2025 Mar;32(1):53-56. doi: 10.1177/09691413241276187. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1177/09691413241276187
PMID:39175407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11869502/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this research was to identify patient barriers and facilitators of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in London.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to 4211 adults, who had been invited for AAA screening in 2023. Barriers and facilitators were identified by comparing responses between attenders and non-attenders, using univariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

271 surveys were returned. Attendance was higher among respondents with a body mass index (BMI) > 25 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.72, 95% CIs [1.15, 6.46];  < 0.05) and those with one or more comorbidities (OR: 3.82, 95% CIs [1.63, 8.98];  < 0.01), but lower among those who had not visited a healthcare appointment within the past 6 months (OR: 0.41, 95% CIs [0.18, 0.94]). Attendance was also lower among those who believe screening is only useful for people with symptoms (OR: 0.37; 95% CIs [0.16, 0.89];  < 0.05), find it difficult to make time for medical appointments (OR: 0.25, 95% CIs [0.10, 0.60];  < 0.01), find it difficult to get to medical appointments (OR: 0.40, 95% CIs [0.17, 0.91];  < 0.05), have more important medical problems to worry about (OR: 0.28, 95% CIs [0.12, 0.64];  < 0.01), cannot afford to travel to medical appointments (OR: 0.16, 95% CIs [0.07, 0.38];  < 0.001), need help getting to appointments (OR: 0.33, 95% CIs [0.13, 0.86];  < 0.05), have caring responsibilities (OR: 0.15, 95% CIs [0.06, 0.34];  < 0.001), and forget about appointments (OR: 0.21, 95% CIs [0.09, 0.49];  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides suggestive data on characteristics that might be associated with not attending AAA screening in London. The study design limitations mean that further work is required to evaluate these characteristics more reliably.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定伦敦腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查中患者面临的障碍和促进因素。

方法

对2023年受邀参加AAA筛查的4211名成年人进行了一项调查。通过单因素逻辑回归比较参加者和未参加者的回答,确定障碍和促进因素。

结果

共收回271份调查问卷。体重指数(BMI)>25的受访者(优势比[OR]:2.72,95%置信区间[CI][1.15,6.46];<0.05)以及患有一种或多种合并症的受访者(OR:3.82,95%CI[1.63,8.98];<0.01)的参与率较高,但在过去6个月内未就诊的受访者中参与率较低(OR:0.41,95%CI[0.18,0.94])。认为筛查仅对有症状的人有用的受访者(OR:0.37;95%CI[0.16,0.89];<0.05)、难以抽出时间就医的受访者(OR:0.25,95%CI[0.10,0.60];<0.01)、难以前往就医的受访者(OR:0.40,95%CI[0.17,0.91];<0.05)、有更重要的医疗问题需要担心的受访者(OR:0.28,95%CI[0.12,0.64];<0.01)、负担不起前往就医的交通费用的受访者(OR:0.16,95%CI[0.07,0.38];<0.001)、需要帮助前往就医的受访者(OR:0.33,95%CI[0.13,0.86];<0.05)、有护理责任的受访者(OR:0.15,95%CI[0.06,0.34];<0.001)以及忘记预约的受访者(OR:0.21,95%CI[0.09,0.49];<0.001)的参与率也较低。

结论

本研究提供了关于可能与伦敦未参加AAA筛查相关的特征的提示性数据。研究设计的局限性意味着需要进一步开展工作以更可靠地评估这些特征。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in London: A cross-sectional survey.伦敦腹主动脉瘤筛查的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面调查。
J Med Screen. 2025 Mar;32(1):53-56. doi: 10.1177/09691413241276187. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
4
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.破裂性腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5(5):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub4.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequalities in cancer screening participation between adults with and without severe mental illness: results from a cross-sectional analysis of primary care data on English Screening Programmes.癌症筛查参与度在有严重精神疾病和无严重精神疾病的成年人之间的不平等:基于英国筛查项目初级保健数据的横断面分析结果。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):81-93. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02249-3. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Improving Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Screening Uptake through Patient Engagement-Analysis and Outcomes of Strategies to Improve Uptake at a Regional Program Level.提高腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查率的患者参与策略-对改善区域性项目水平的接受度的分析和结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:488-497. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.146. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Editor's Choice - Inequalities in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening in England: Effects of Social Deprivation and Ethnicity.编辑推荐——英国腹主动脉瘤筛查中的不平等:社会剥夺和种族的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;53(6):837-843. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Reasons for non-participation in population-based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.参与人群腹部主动脉瘤筛查的原因。
Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):481-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9434. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
5
The importance of socioeconomic factors for compliance and outcome at screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men.65 岁男性筛查腹主动脉瘤时社会经济因素对依从性和结果的重要性。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.080. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
6
Uptake of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. A cohort study.腹主动脉瘤筛查的应用。一项队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jun;45(6):610-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
7
The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial.多中心动脉瘤筛查研究(MASS):关于腹主动脉瘤筛查对男性死亡率影响的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1531-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11522-4.