• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与人群腹部主动脉瘤筛查的原因。

Reasons for non-participation in population-based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet at Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):481-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9434. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.9434
PMID:24615380
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A population-based screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) started in 2010 in Stockholm County, Sweden. This present study used individual data from Sweden's extensive healthcare registries to identify the reasons for non-participation in the AAA screening programme.

METHODS

All 65-year-old men in Stockholm are invited to screening for AAA; this study included all men invited from July 2010 to July 2012. Participants and non-participants were compared for socioeconomic factors, travel distance to the examination centre and healthcare use. The influence of these factors on participation was analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The participation rate for AAA screening was 77·6 per cent (18 876 of 24 319 men invited). The prevalence of AAA (aortic diameter more than 2·9 cm) among participants was 1·4 per cent. The most important reasons for non-participation in the multivariable regression analyses were: recent immigration (within 5 years) (odds ratio (OR) 3·25, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·94 to 5·47), low income (OR 2·76, 2·46 to 3·10), marital status single or divorced (OR 2·23, 2·08 to 2·39), low level of education (OR 1·28, 1·16 to 1·40) and long travel distance (OR 1·23, 1·10 to 1·37). Non-participants had a higher incidence of stroke (4·5 versus 2·8 per cent; P < 0·001) and chronic pulmonary disease (2·9 versus 1·3 per cent; P < 0·001). Daily smoking was more common in residential areas where the participation rate for AAA screening was low.

CONCLUSION

Efforts to improve participation in AAA screening should target the groups with low income, a low level of education and immigrants. The higher morbidity in the non-participant group, together with a higher rate of smoking, make it probable that this group also has a high risk of AAA.

摘要

背景

2010 年,瑞典斯德哥尔摩县启动了一项基于人群的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查计划。本研究利用瑞典广泛的医疗保健登记数据,确定了不参与 AAA 筛查计划的原因。

方法

所有 65 岁的斯德哥尔摩男性都被邀请参加 AAA 筛查;本研究包括 2010 年 7 月至 2012 年 7 月期间邀请的所有男性。比较参与者和非参与者的社会经济因素、前往检查中心的旅行距离和医疗保健使用情况。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型分析这些因素对参与的影响。

结果

AAA 筛查的参与率为 77.6%(24319 名受邀男性中有 18876 人参加)。参与者中 AAA(主动脉直径大于 2.9cm)的患病率为 1.4%。多变量回归分析中最重要的不参与原因是:近期移民(5 年内)(比值比(OR)3.25,95%置信区间 1.94 至 5.47)、低收入(OR 2.76,2.46 至 3.10)、单身或离异(OR 2.23,2.08 至 2.39)、低教育水平(OR 1.28,1.16 至 1.40)和长距离旅行(OR 1.23,1.10 至 1.37)。不参与者中风(4.5%对 2.8%;P<0.001)和慢性肺部疾病(2.9%对 1.3%;P<0.001)的发病率更高。AAA 筛查参与率较低的居民区,日常吸烟更为普遍。

结论

提高 AAA 筛查参与率的努力应针对低收入、低教育水平和移民群体。不参与者的发病率较高,加上吸烟率较高,可能表明该群体也有较高的 AAA 风险。

相似文献

1
Reasons for non-participation in population-based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.参与人群腹部主动脉瘤筛查的原因。
Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):481-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9434. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
2
Influence of rurality, deprivation and distance from clinic on uptake in men invited for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.农村、贫困和距诊所距离对接受邀请进行腹主动脉瘤筛查的男性的影响。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):916-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9803. Epub 2015 May 7.
3
Current prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 70-year-old women.70 岁女性的腹主动脉瘤当前患病率。
Br J Surg. 2013 Feb;100(3):367-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8984. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
4
Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm acceptable to the population? Selection and recruitment to hospital-based mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
J Public Health Med. 1998 Jun;20(2):211-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024745.
5
Abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Dec;57(12):B4219.
6
Benefits and harms of screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Sweden: a registry-based cohort study.瑞典男性腹部主动脉瘤筛查的获益与危害:基于登记的队列研究。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 16;391(10138):2441-2447. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31031-6.
7
A further meta-analysis of population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.进一步基于人群的腹主动脉瘤筛查的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.283. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
8
Results of aortic screening in the brothers of patients who had elective aortic aneurysm repair.对接受择期主动脉瘤修复术患者的兄弟进行主动脉筛查的结果。
Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):778-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00652.x.
9
Prevalence of aortic aneurysm in men with a history of inguinal hernia repair.有腹股沟疝修补史男性的主动脉瘤患病率。
Br J Surg. 1999 Sep;86(9):1155-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01213.x.
10
Risk factors associated with increased prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.与女性腹主动脉瘤患病率升高相关的风险因素。
Br J Surg. 2016 Aug;103(9):1132-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10179. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Decreasing aortic diameter and decreasing prevalence of infrarenal aortic aneurysms in a population-based screening programme.在一项基于人群的筛查项目中,肾下腹主动脉瘤的主动脉直径减小,患病率降低。
Br J Surg. 2025 Aug 1;112(8). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf156.
2
Barriers and facilitators of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in London: A cross-sectional survey.伦敦腹主动脉瘤筛查的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面调查。
J Med Screen. 2025 Mar;32(1):53-56. doi: 10.1177/09691413241276187. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Examining the continuum of resistance model in two population-based screening studies in Sweden.
在瑞典两项基于人群的筛查研究中检验耐药连续性模型。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 13;35:102317. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102317. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Arabic-speaking male immigrants' perceptions of preventive initiatives: An interview study.阿拉伯语男性移民对预防措施的看法:一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1618-1627. doi: 10.1111/hex.13766. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
Oral glucose tolerance testing as a complement to fasting plasma glucose in screening for type 2 diabetes: population-based cross-sectional analyses of 146 000 health examinations in Västerbotten, Sweden.口服葡萄糖耐量试验作为空腹血糖筛查 2 型糖尿病的补充:瑞典韦斯特博滕 14.6 万次健康检查的基于人群的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e062172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062172.
6
Does socioeconomic status make a difference? A register-based study on the extent to which cardiovascular screening in patients with inflammatory arthritis leads to recommended follow-up in general practice.社会经济地位有影响吗?一项基于登记的研究,探讨炎症性关节炎患者的心血管筛查在多大程度上导致了在普通实践中的推荐随访。
RMD Open. 2020 Aug;6(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000940.
7
Drug utilization in the Maastricht Study: A comparison with nationwide data.马斯特里赫特研究中的药物使用情况:与全国数据的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18524. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018524.
8
Symptoms of Depression and Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A HUNT Study.抑郁症症状与腹主动脉瘤风险:一项 HUNT 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e012535. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012535. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
Do Non-participants at Screening have a Different Threshold for an Acceptable Benefit-Harm Ratio than Participants? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.筛查中的非参与者与参与者相比,对可接受的获益-风险比有不同的阈值吗?一项离散选择实验的结果。
Patient. 2019 Oct;12(5):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00364-z.
10
A Majority of Admitted Patients With Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Undergo and Survive Corrective Treatment: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.大多数腹主动脉瘤破裂入院患者接受了矫正治疗并存活:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):3080-3087. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3705-9.