Opara Olivia A, Narayanan Rajkishen, Issa Tariq, Tarawneh Omar H, Lee Yunsoo, Patrizio Harrison A, Glover Abbey, Brown Bergin, McCormick Christian, Kurd Mark F, Kaye Ian D, Canseco Jose A, Hilibrand Alan S, Vaccaro Alexander R, Kepler Christopher K, Schroeder Gregory D
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jan 15;50(2):E22-E28. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005125. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
Retrospective cohort study.
To examine how community-level economic disadvantage impacts short-term outcomes following posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
The effects of socioeconomic factors, measured by the Distress Community Index (DCI), on postoperative outcomes after PCDF are underexplored. By understanding the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on PCDF outcomes, disparities in care can be addressed.
Retrospective review of 554 patients who underwent PCDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy between 2017 and 2022. SES was assessed using DCI obtained from patient zip codes. Patients were stratified into quintiles from Prosperous to Distressed based on DCI. Bivariate analyses and multivariate regressions were performed to evaluate the associations between social determinants of health and surgical outcomes, including length of stay, home discharge, complications, and readmissions.
Patients living in at-risk/distressed communities were more likely to be Black (53.3%). Patients living in at-risk/distressed communities had the longest hospitalization (6.24 d vs. prosperous: 3.92, P =0.006). Significantly less at-risk/distressed patients were discharged home without additional services (37.3% vs. mid-tier: 52.5% vs. comfortable: 53.4% vs. prosperous: 56.4%, P <0.001). On multivariate analysis, residing in an at-risk/distressed community was independently associated with nonhome discharge [odds ratio (OR): 2.28, P =0.007] and longer length of stay (E:1.54, P =0.017).
Patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged communities experience longer hospitalizations and are more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility following PCDF. Social and economic barriers should be addressed as part of presurgical counseling and planning in elective spine surgery to mitigate these disparities and improve the quality and value of health care delivery, regardless of socioeconomic status.
回顾性队列研究。
探讨社区层面的经济劣势如何影响脊髓型颈椎病后路颈椎减压融合术(PCDF)后的短期结局。
通过社区困境指数(DCI)衡量的社会经济因素对PCDF术后结局的影响尚未得到充分研究。通过了解社会经济地位(SES)对PCDF结局的影响,可以解决医疗保健方面的差异问题。
对2017年至2022年间接受PCDF治疗脊髓型颈椎病的554例患者进行回顾性研究。使用从患者邮政编码中获取的DCI评估SES。根据DCI将患者分为从繁荣到困境的五个五分位数。进行双变量分析和多变量回归,以评估健康的社会决定因素与手术结局之间的关联,包括住院时间、出院回家、并发症和再入院情况。
生活在高危/困境社区的患者更有可能是黑人(53.3%)。生活在高危/困境社区的患者住院时间最长(6.24天,而繁荣社区为3.92天,P = 0.006)。显著更少的高危/困境患者在无需额外服务的情况下出院回家(37.3%,而中层社区为52.5%,舒适社区为53.4%,繁荣社区为56.4%,P < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,居住在高危/困境社区与非回家出院独立相关[比值比(OR):2.28,P = 0.007]和更长的住院时间(E:1.54,P = 0.017)。
来自社会经济弱势社区的患者住院时间更长,并且在PCDF术后更有可能被转至康复或专业护理机构。在择期脊柱手术的术前咨询和规划中,应解决社会和经济障碍,以减轻这些差异并提高医疗保健服务的质量和价值,无论社会经济地位如何。