Zhang Ruipeng, Yu Haiyang, Zhang Wenbiao, Li Wei, Su Hao, Wu Sixuan, Xu Qiong, Li Yaying, Yao Huaiying
Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China.
Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Urban Environmental Processes and Pollution Control, CAS Haixi Industrial Technology Innovation Center in Beilun, Ningbo, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Aug 8;15:1433220. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1433220. eCollection 2024.
Straw return is regarded as a widely used field management strategy for improving soil health, but its comprehensive effect on crop grain yield and quality remains elusive. Herein, a meta-analysis containing 1822 pairs of observations from 78 studies was conducted to quantify the effect of straw return on grain yield and quality of three main crops (maize, rice, and wheat). On average, compared with no straw return, straw return significantly (< 0.05) increased grain yield (+4.3%), protein content (+2.5%), total amino acids concentration (+1.2%), and grain phosphorus content (+3.6%), respectively. Meanwhile, straw return significantly (< 0.05) decreased rice chalky grain rate (-14.4%), overall grain hardness (-1.9%), and water absorption of maize and wheat (-0.5%), respectively. Moreover, straw return effects on grain yield and quality traits were infected by cultivated crop types, straw return amounts, straw return methods, and straw return duration. Our findings illustrated that direct straw return increased three main crop grain yields and improved various quality traits among different agricultural production areas. Although improper straw return may increase plant disease risk and affect seed germination, our results suggest that full straw return with covered or plough mode is a more suitable way to enhance grain yield and quality. Our study also highlights that compared with direct straw return, straw burning or composting before application may also be beneficial to farmland productivity and sustainability, but comparative studies in this area are still lacking.
秸秆还田被视为一种广泛应用于改善土壤健康的田间管理策略,但其对作物籽粒产量和品质的综合影响仍不明确。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,纳入了来自78项研究的1822对观测数据,以量化秸秆还田对三种主要作物(玉米、水稻和小麦)籽粒产量和品质的影响。平均而言,与不进行秸秆还田相比,秸秆还田显著(<0.05)提高了籽粒产量(+4.3%)、蛋白质含量(+2.5%)、总氨基酸浓度(+1.2%)以及籽粒磷含量(+3.6%)。同时,秸秆还田显著(<0.05)降低了水稻的垩白粒率(-14.4%)、整体籽粒硬度(-1.9%)以及玉米和小麦的吸水率(-0.5%)。此外,秸秆还田对籽粒产量和品质性状的影响受种植作物类型、秸秆还田量、秸秆还田方式以及秸秆还田持续时间的影响。我们的研究结果表明,直接秸秆还田提高了三种主要作物的籽粒产量,并改善了不同农业生产地区的各种品质性状。尽管不当的秸秆还田可能增加植物病害风险并影响种子萌发,但我们的结果表明,采用覆盖或深耕模式进行全量秸秆还田是提高籽粒产量和品质的更合适方式。我们的研究还强调,与直接秸秆还田相比,施用前焚烧或堆肥秸秆可能也有利于农田生产力和可持续性,但该领域的比较研究仍然缺乏。