• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

秸秆还田提高三种主要作物的产量和品质:一项荟萃分析的证据

Straw return enhances grain yield and quality of three main crops: evidence from a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Ruipeng, Yu Haiyang, Zhang Wenbiao, Li Wei, Su Hao, Wu Sixuan, Xu Qiong, Li Yaying, Yao Huaiying

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China.

Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Urban Environmental Processes and Pollution Control, CAS Haixi Industrial Technology Innovation Center in Beilun, Ningbo, China.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2024 Aug 8;15:1433220. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1433220. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2024.1433220
PMID:39175489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340517/
Abstract

Straw return is regarded as a widely used field management strategy for improving soil health, but its comprehensive effect on crop grain yield and quality remains elusive. Herein, a meta-analysis containing 1822 pairs of observations from 78 studies was conducted to quantify the effect of straw return on grain yield and quality of three main crops (maize, rice, and wheat). On average, compared with no straw return, straw return significantly (< 0.05) increased grain yield (+4.3%), protein content (+2.5%), total amino acids concentration (+1.2%), and grain phosphorus content (+3.6%), respectively. Meanwhile, straw return significantly (< 0.05) decreased rice chalky grain rate (-14.4%), overall grain hardness (-1.9%), and water absorption of maize and wheat (-0.5%), respectively. Moreover, straw return effects on grain yield and quality traits were infected by cultivated crop types, straw return amounts, straw return methods, and straw return duration. Our findings illustrated that direct straw return increased three main crop grain yields and improved various quality traits among different agricultural production areas. Although improper straw return may increase plant disease risk and affect seed germination, our results suggest that full straw return with covered or plough mode is a more suitable way to enhance grain yield and quality. Our study also highlights that compared with direct straw return, straw burning or composting before application may also be beneficial to farmland productivity and sustainability, but comparative studies in this area are still lacking.

摘要

秸秆还田被视为一种广泛应用于改善土壤健康的田间管理策略,但其对作物籽粒产量和品质的综合影响仍不明确。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,纳入了来自78项研究的1822对观测数据,以量化秸秆还田对三种主要作物(玉米、水稻和小麦)籽粒产量和品质的影响。平均而言,与不进行秸秆还田相比,秸秆还田显著(<0.05)提高了籽粒产量(+4.3%)、蛋白质含量(+2.5%)、总氨基酸浓度(+1.2%)以及籽粒磷含量(+3.6%)。同时,秸秆还田显著(<0.05)降低了水稻的垩白粒率(-14.4%)、整体籽粒硬度(-1.9%)以及玉米和小麦的吸水率(-0.5%)。此外,秸秆还田对籽粒产量和品质性状的影响受种植作物类型、秸秆还田量、秸秆还田方式以及秸秆还田持续时间的影响。我们的研究结果表明,直接秸秆还田提高了三种主要作物的籽粒产量,并改善了不同农业生产地区的各种品质性状。尽管不当的秸秆还田可能增加植物病害风险并影响种子萌发,但我们的结果表明,采用覆盖或深耕模式进行全量秸秆还田是提高籽粒产量和品质的更合适方式。我们的研究还强调,与直接秸秆还田相比,施用前焚烧或堆肥秸秆可能也有利于农田生产力和可持续性,但该领域的比较研究仍然缺乏。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/b631365ee004/fpls-15-1433220-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/d7aad927812d/fpls-15-1433220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/956b5a5d0056/fpls-15-1433220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/b4b7a85f97a6/fpls-15-1433220-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/bd8fb18af187/fpls-15-1433220-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/0212a6aa9b44/fpls-15-1433220-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/a058549942f6/fpls-15-1433220-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/b631365ee004/fpls-15-1433220-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/d7aad927812d/fpls-15-1433220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/956b5a5d0056/fpls-15-1433220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/b4b7a85f97a6/fpls-15-1433220-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/bd8fb18af187/fpls-15-1433220-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/0212a6aa9b44/fpls-15-1433220-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/a058549942f6/fpls-15-1433220-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/11340517/b631365ee004/fpls-15-1433220-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Straw return enhances grain yield and quality of three main crops: evidence from a meta-analysis.秸秆还田提高三种主要作物的产量和品质:一项荟萃分析的证据
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Aug 8;15:1433220. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1433220. eCollection 2024.
2
Agricultural management strategies for balancing yield increase, carbon sequestration, and emission reduction after straw return for three major grain crops in China: A meta-analysis.中国三大粮食作物秸秆还田后平衡增产、固碳减排的农业管理策略:一项荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Aug 15;340:117965. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117965. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
[Optimizing Straw Management to Enhance Carbon and Nitrogen Efficiency and Economic Benefit of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping System].[优化秸秆管理以提高小麦-玉米复种系统的碳氮效率和经济效益]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Jan 8;44(1):463-472. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202203005.
4
Effects of straw return with potassium fertilizer on the stem lodging resistance, grain quality and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.).秸秆还田配施钾肥对春玉米茎秆抗倒性、品质及产量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 20;13(1):20307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46569-z.
5
[Effects of short-term granulated straw incorporation on grain yield and soil respiration in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system.].[短期秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米种植系统籽粒产量和土壤呼吸的影响。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Feb;29(2):565-572. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201802.030.
6
Response of soil organic carbon to straw return in farmland soil in China: A meta-analysis.中国农田土壤中秸秆还田对土壤有机碳的响应:一项荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:121051. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121051. Epub 2024 May 8.
7
[Temporal and Spatial Distribution, Utilization Status, and Carbon Emission Reduction Potential of Straw Resources in China].[中国秸秆资源的时空分布、利用现状及碳排放减排潜力]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Feb 8;44(2):1149-1162. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202201033.
8
Impact of straw management on seasonal soil carbon dioxide emissions, soil water content, and temperature in a semi-arid region of China.秸秆管理对半干旱地区土壤二氧化碳排放、土壤水分和温度的季节影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 20;652:471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.207. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
9
Effects of long-term straw return on soil organic carbon storage and sequestration rate in North China upland crops: A meta-analysis.长期秸秆还田对华北旱作作物土壤有机碳储量和固存率的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Apr;26(4):2686-2701. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15018. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Wheat and maize-derived water-washed and unwashed biochar improved the nutrients phytoavailability and the grain and straw yield of rice and wheat: A field trial for sustainable management of paddy soils.小麦和玉米源水洗和未洗生物炭提高了水稻和小麦的养分植物可利用性以及籽粒和秸秆产量:稻田可持续管理的田间试验。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 1;297:113250. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113250. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of different types of straw returning on soil physicochemical properties, microbial community structure, and pepper quality.不同类型秸秆还田对土壤理化性质、微生物群落结构及辣椒品质的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jul 1;16:1620502. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1620502. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Nitrogen input on organic amendments alters the pattern of soil-microbe-plant co-dependence.有机肥料的氮输入改变了土壤-微生物-植物共生的模式。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 10;890:164347. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164347. Epub 2023 May 23.
2
Agricultural management strategies for balancing yield increase, carbon sequestration, and emission reduction after straw return for three major grain crops in China: A meta-analysis.中国三大粮食作物秸秆还田后平衡增产、固碳减排的农业管理策略:一项荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Aug 15;340:117965. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117965. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Integrated crop-livestock-bioenergy system brings co-benefits and trade-offs in mitigating the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture.
种养-生物能源一体化系统在减轻中国农业的环境影响方面带来了协同效益和权衡取舍。
Nat Food. 2022 Dec;3(12):1052-1064. doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00649-x. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Comparing the variations and influencing factors of CH emissions from paddies and wetlands under CO enrichment: A data synthesis in the last three decades.比较 CO2 富集下稻田和湿地 CH 排放的变化及其影响因素:过去三十年的数据综合。
Environ Res. 2023 Jul 1;228:115842. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115842. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
5
Microbial necromass in cropland soils: A global meta-analysis of management effects.农田土壤中的微生物坏死物质:管理效应的全球荟萃分析
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Apr;29(7):1998-2014. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16613. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
Effect of different straw retention techniques on soil microbial community structure in wheat-maize rotation system.不同秸秆还田技术对小麦-玉米轮作系统土壤微生物群落结构的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1069458. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1069458. eCollection 2022.
7
Microbial nutrient limitations limit carbon sequestration but promote nitrogen and phosphorus cycling: A case study in an agroecosystem with long-term straw return.微生物养分限制限制了碳的固存,但促进了氮磷循环:以长期秸秆还田的农业生态系统为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 20;870:161865. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161865. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
8
Elevated CO does not necessarily enhance greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies.CO 浓度升高不一定会增强稻田温室气体排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 1;810:152363. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152363. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
9
Response of rice yield traits to elevated atmospheric CO concentration and its interaction with cultivar, nitrogen application rate and temperature: A meta-analysis of 20 years FACE studies.大气 CO 浓度升高及其与品种、施氮率和温度相互作用对水稻产量性状的响应:20 年 FACE 研究的荟萃分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 10;764:142797. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142797. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
Effects of long-term straw return on soil organic carbon storage and sequestration rate in North China upland crops: A meta-analysis.长期秸秆还田对华北旱作作物土壤有机碳储量和固存率的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Apr;26(4):2686-2701. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15018. Epub 2020 Feb 24.