• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的危险因素:长期随访研究

Risk factors of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: long-term follow-up study.

作者信息

Park Sangil, Kim Bum Joon, Choi Hye-Yeon, Chang Dae-Il, Woo Ho Geol, Heo Sung Hyuk

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 8;15:1411045. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1411045. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1411045
PMID:39175764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS), it is unclear which risk factors are related to long-term outcomes, including in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study aimed to assess the factors associated with restenosis after CAS with a median follow-up of 35.7 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent CAS from January 2013 to December 2018 were included if they had symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The carotid Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) was followed up after the procedure. We defined at least 50% restenosis using the criteria that the internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity (PSV) was greater than 224 cm/s or the ICA to common carotid artery PSV ratio was higher than 3.4. The risk factors for ISR were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 189 patients, 122 had symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, and 67 had asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Patients were evaluated by CDU for a median of 35.7 months (interquartile range 19.5 to 70.0). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the longest time to ISR was 39 months, and ISR-free was better in the asymptomatic CAS group. In all groups, ISR was independently associated with current smoker [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.425; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.086 to 10.801] and elevated ICA PSV at baseline (aOR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001 to 1.007).

CONCLUSION

Independent risk factors for ISR in the CAS group included current smoking and elevated ICA PSV at baseline. In the symptomatic CAS group, alcohol was independently associated with the ISR. ISR did not occur after 39 months from the CAS procedure in our study patients. Future studies with extended follow-up are necessary to fully understand the long-term outcomes of CAS.

摘要

背景

在颈动脉血管成形术加支架置入术(CAS)后,尚不清楚哪些危险因素与包括支架内再狭窄(ISR)在内的长期预后相关。本研究旨在评估CAS术后再狭窄的相关因素,中位随访时间为35.7个月。

材料与方法

纳入2013年1月至2018年12月期间接受CAS治疗且有症状或无症状颈动脉狭窄的患者。术后进行颈动脉多普勒超声检查(CDU)随访。我们采用颈内动脉(ICA)收缩期峰值流速(PSV)大于224 cm/s或ICA与颈总动脉PSV比值高于3.4的标准定义至少50%的再狭窄。还评估了ISR的危险因素。

结果

189例患者中,122例有症状性颈动脉狭窄,67例有无症状性颈动脉狭窄。患者接受CDU评估的中位时间为35.7个月(四分位间距为19.5至70.0个月)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,ISR最长发生时间为39个月,无症状CAS组无ISR的情况更好。在所有组中,ISR与当前吸烟者独立相关[调整后的优势比(aOR),3.425;95%置信区间(CI),1.086至10.801]以及基线时ICA PSV升高(aOR,1.004;95%CI,1.001至1.007)。

结论

CAS组ISR的独立危险因素包括当前吸烟和基线时ICA PSV升高。在有症状的CAS组中,饮酒与ISR独立相关。在我们的研究患者中,CAS术后39个月后未发生ISR。需要进行更长随访时间的未来研究以充分了解CAS的长期预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c61/11340531/fa4dd85ff03c/fneur-15-1411045-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c61/11340531/57b35667aef6/fneur-15-1411045-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c61/11340531/fa4dd85ff03c/fneur-15-1411045-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c61/11340531/57b35667aef6/fneur-15-1411045-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c61/11340531/fa4dd85ff03c/fneur-15-1411045-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: long-term follow-up study.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的危险因素:长期随访研究
Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 8;15:1411045. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1411045. eCollection 2024.
2
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
3
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.既往颈动脉内膜切除术与新发病变后颈动脉支架置入术的长期比较结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1526602815581597. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
4
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.支架置入后颈动脉的双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038.
5
Grading carotid intrastent restenosis: a 6-year follow-up study.颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄的分级:一项6年随访研究。
Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1189-96. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497487. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
6
Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis.颈动脉支架内再狭窄的超声速度标准。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Feb 15;69(3):349-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21032.
7
Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后严重支架内再狭窄的超声标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.031.
8
Predictive Value of Quantitative Duplex Ultrasound Analysis for In-stent Carotid Artery Restenosis.定量双功超声分析对颈动脉支架内再狭窄的预测价值
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):52-57.
9
Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis.颈动脉支架内再狭窄的临床影响和预测因素。
J Neurol. 2012 Sep;259(9):1896-902. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6436-3. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
10
Percutaneous Treatment of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report and State-of-the-Art Review.经皮治疗颈动脉支架置入术后复发性支架内再狭窄:一例报告及最新综述
Am J Case Rep. 2015 Aug 21;16:558-62. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.894198.

引用本文的文献

1
Single Center Experience on Endovascular Treatment of Occlusion and/or Stenosis of Bilateral Carotid Arteries.双侧颈动脉闭塞和/或狭窄血管内治疗的单中心经验
Brain Behav. 2025 Mar;15(3):e70395. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70395.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Are Associated With Subsequent Stented-Territory Ischemic Stroke After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single Center Retrospective Study.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平与颈动脉支架置入术后支架内缺血性卒中相关:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023 May;12(2):175-188. doi: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.2.175. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2022 Oct;53(10):3047-3054. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038994. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Treatment of the Carotid In-stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review.
颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄的治疗:一项系统评价。
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 4;12:748304. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.748304. eCollection 2021.
4
Carotid Revascularization Improves Cognition in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis and Cognitive Decline. Greater Improvement in Younger Patients With More Disordered Neuropsychological Performance.颈动脉血运重建术可改善无症状性颈动脉狭窄伴认知功能下降患者的认知功能。神经心理学表现紊乱且年龄较小的患者改善更明显。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Apr;30(4):105608. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105608. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Application of Linear Gradient Magnetic Field in Arterial Profile Scanning Imaging.线性梯度磁场在动脉轮廓扫描成像中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 13;20(16):4547. doi: 10.3390/s20164547.
6
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
7
In-depth mining of clinical data: the construction of clinical prediction model with R.临床数据的深度挖掘:使用R构建临床预测模型。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):796. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.63.
8
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家卒中负担,1990-2016 年:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
9
Risk Factors for Restenosis After Carotid Revascularization: A Meta-Analysis of Hazard Ratios.颈动脉血运重建术后再狭窄的危险因素:风险比的Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:414-424. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.065. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Systematic Review for the 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2018 年 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA 血脂管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1144-e1161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000626. Epub 2018 Nov 10.