Suppr超能文献

记忆结合测试可在临床前早期阶段预测阿尔茨海默病的诊断:INSIGHTpreAD队列的纵向研究

The memory binding test can anticipate Alzheimer's disease diagnosis at an early preclinical stage: a longitudinal study in the INSIGHTpreAD cohort.

作者信息

Raposo Pereira Filipa, George Nathalie, Dalla Barba Gianfranco, Dubois Bruno, La Corte Valentina

机构信息

Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, INSERM, U 1127, CNRS, UMR 7225, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Department of Neurology, Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Aug 8;16:1414419. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1414419. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anticipating the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at an early asymptomatic at-risk stage, where therapeutics can more effectively delay conscious cognitive decline, is currently among the biggest challenges in the field. Herein, we aimed to compare the capacity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) with the official diagnostic tool, the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), to anticipate AD diagnosis at an early preclinical stage based on the associative memory component of MBT (binding), suggested as more sensitive to the emergence of subtle episodic memory (EM) deficits (AD hallmark).

METHODS

We assessed the tests performance longitudinally (over 5 years) in 263 cognitively-normal elderly individuals at risk of AD (>6 months of subjective memory complaints) using linear mixed-effect models controlled for age, sex, and education. We stratified participants in 2 models: amyloid-β (Aβ)/neurodegeneration (N) model, assessing Aβ burden and neurodegeneration effect [3 groups: controls (Aβ-/N-); stable/N- (Aβ+); stable/N+ (Aβ+)]; and the stable/progressors model, assessing progression to prodromal-AD effect [2 groups: stable (Aβ+); progressors (Aβ+)], based on 15 subjects who progressed to AD during follow-up (excluded once diagnosed).

RESULTS

Aβ burden was associated with significantly less MBT-intrusions, while Aβ burden and neurodegeneration together, with the most. Progression status had a strong negative effect on both tests performance. When compared with the FCSRT, the MBT seems to anticipate diagnosis based on a worst performance in a higher number of scores (including binding) in at least a year.

DISCUSSION

Anticipation of diagnosis to an asymptomatic at-risk stage, while participants remain cognitively-normal according to FCSRT cut-offs and unaware of objective EM deficits, has the potential to delay the onset of AD-linked cognitive decline by applying promising therapeutics before decline becomes too advanced.

摘要

引言

在早期无症状风险阶段预测阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断是该领域目前面临的最大挑战之一,在此阶段进行治疗可以更有效地延缓意识性认知衰退。在此,我们旨在比较记忆联结测试(MBT)与官方诊断工具自由和线索选择性回忆测试(FCSRT)基于MBT的联想记忆成分(联结)在临床前期早期预测AD诊断的能力,该成分被认为对细微情节记忆(EM)缺陷(AD的标志)的出现更敏感。

方法

我们使用控制年龄、性别和教育程度的线性混合效应模型,对263名有AD风险的认知正常老年人(主观记忆主诉超过6个月)进行了长达5年的纵向测试评估。我们将参与者分为两个模型:淀粉样β蛋白(Aβ)/神经退行性变(N)模型,评估Aβ负担和神经退行性变的影响[3组:对照组(Aβ-/N-);稳定/N-(Aβ+);稳定/N+(Aβ+)];以及稳定/进展者模型,评估进展为前驱AD的影响[2组:稳定(Aβ+);进展者(Aβ+)],基于随访期间进展为AD的15名受试者(一旦确诊即排除)。

结果

Aβ负担与MBT侵入显著减少相关,而Aβ负担和神经退行性变共同作用时,相关性最强。进展状态对两项测试的表现都有强烈的负面影响。与FCSRT相比,MBT似乎至少在一年内基于更多分数(包括联结)的更差表现来预测诊断。

讨论

在参与者根据FCSRT临界值仍认知正常且未意识到客观EM缺陷的情况下,将诊断提前到无症状风险阶段,有可能通过在衰退变得过于严重之前应用有前景的治疗方法来延迟与AD相关的认知衰退的发作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924f/11340525/96f38190588b/fnagi-16-1414419-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验