Long H W
Health Serv Res. 1979 Fall;14(3):183-205.
The economic and political environment in which providers of health care will operate during the 1980s will continue to be increasingly restrictive. Any private-sector organization's long-run survival depends directly on the quality of its investment decisions, broadly defined. This decision making will require three major innovations if private sector health care providers are to survive: 1) traditional biases about the economics of not-for-profit entities must be abandoned; 2) standard data, procedures, and personnel from the accounting discipline must be supplemented with information, methodologies, and people from the discipline of corporate finance; and 3) economic and fiscal risk must be measured and incorporated into both investment decisions and interactions with external regulators. Practitioners can begin to implement these innovations immediately. Although substantial literature exists developing all these concepts generally and applying them to for-profit settings, the literature purporting to treat investment decision making for private-sector health care providers is, on average, replete with conceptual error, simplistic thinking, erroneous applications, and out-of-date methodologies. The literature is, in a word, horrid. Authors, both practitioner and academic, should stop writing terrible books and booklike periodicals for easy royalty dollars, and, instead, pursue sound applied research and disseminate their results in classrooms and in refereed journals.
20世纪80年代医疗保健服务提供者所处的经济和政治环境将继续受到越来越多的限制。任何私营部门组织的长期生存直接取决于其广义投资决策的质量。如果私营部门医疗保健服务提供者想要生存下去,这种决策需要三项重大创新:1)必须摒弃关于非营利性实体经济状况的传统偏见;2)会计学科的标准数据、程序和人员必须辅以公司财务学科的信息、方法和人员;3)必须对经济和财政风险进行衡量,并将其纳入投资决策以及与外部监管机构的互动之中。从业者可以立即开始实施这些创新。虽然有大量文献总体上阐述了所有这些概念,并将它们应用于营利性机构,但声称论述私营部门医疗保健服务提供者投资决策的文献,总体而言充斥着概念错误、简单化思维、错误应用和过时的方法。一言以蔽之,这些文献糟糕透顶。从业者和学者作者都不应再为了轻松获得版税而撰写糟糕的书籍和类似书籍的期刊文章,而应进行扎实的应用研究,并在课堂和同行评审期刊上传播研究成果。