• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Investment decision making in the health care industry: the future.医疗保健行业的投资决策:未来
Health Serv Res. 1979 Fall;14(3):183-205.
2
Health and human services in an age of maturity.成熟时代的健康与公共服务。
Health Prog. 1986 Dec;67(10):58-65.
3
Valuation as a criterion in not-for-profit decision-making.估值作为非营利性决策的一项标准。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1976 Summer;1(3):34-46.
4
Creating value-focused healthcare delivery systems: Part three--Core competencies.创建以价值为导向的医疗服务体系:第三部分——核心竞争力。
J Oncol Manag. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):16-23.
5
A primer on EVA for health care providers.医疗服务提供者的经济增加值入门知识。
J Health Care Finance. 2007 Spring;33(3):22-38.
6
Real estate investment trusts see resurgence.房地产投资信托再度兴起。
Contemp Longterm Care. 1986 Feb;9(2):43-4.
7
Financing growth through real estate investment trusts.通过房地产投资信托基金为增长融资。
Healthspan. 1988 Mar;5(3):16-8.
8
Investors look for systems that will be around long enough to pay off their debt. They use traditional financial benchmarks.
Strateg Healthc Excell. 1998 Jun;11(6):8-12.
9
Financing health care companies when the stock market is down. Part two.在股市低迷时为医疗保健公司融资。第二部分。
Contemp Adm Long Term Care. 1984 Oct;7(10):61-6, 75-6.
10
Private health care sector investment in Brazil: opportunities and obstacles.巴西私营医疗保健部门的投资:机遇与障碍。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2003;39(1):11-4, 30, 32.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing HIGH-COST medicine: hospital surveys, health planning, and the paradox of progressive reform.设计高成本药物:医院调查、卫生规划与渐进式改革的悖论。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):223-33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155838. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
2
National health expenditures: short-term outlook and long-term projections.国家卫生支出:短期展望与长期预测。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1981 Winter;2(3):97-138.
3
Cost of capital, target rate of return, and investment decision making.资本成本、目标回报率与投资决策
Health Serv Res. 1981 Fall;16(3):335-41.
4
Decision models for capital investment and financing decisions in hospitals.医院资本投资与融资决策的决策模型
Health Serv Res. 1980 Spring;15(1):35-52.
5
Optimum distribution of diagnostic-specific technology.
J Med Syst. 1984 Aug;8(4):249-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02222173.
6
Pricing objectives in nonprofit hospitals.非营利性医院的定价目标。
Health Serv Res. 1985 Jun;20(2):153-62.

本文引用的文献

1
Is being tax-exempt really better?免税真的更好吗?
Hosp Financ Manage. 1978 Aug;32(8):8-10, 12-4, 16-8.
2
Economic behavior of social institutions.社会机构的经济行为。
Hosp Adm (Chic). 1975 Winter;20(1):8-16.
3
Identity crisis: financial management in health.身份危机:医疗卫生领域的财务管理
Health Care Manage Rev. 1976 Fall;1(4):31-46. doi: 10.1097/00004010-197600140-00007.
4
Valuation as a criterion in not-for-profit decision-making.估值作为非营利性决策的一项标准。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1976 Summer;1(3):34-46.
5
The process of resource allocation.资源分配的过程。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1978 Fall;23(4):75-89.
6
Health care and the United States economic system. An essay in abnormal physiology.医疗保健与美国经济体系。一篇关于异常生理学的文章。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1972 Apr;50(2):211-44.
7
Application of cost-benefit analysis to the health services and the special case of technologic innovation.
Int J Health Serv. 1974 Spring;4(2):325-52. doi: 10.2190/YVTU-WKB5-QM0L-1BYU.
8
The impact of certificate-of need controls on hospital investment.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976 Spring;54(2):185-214.
9
Financial information systems: the key to hospitals' survival.财务信息系统:医院生存的关键。
Hospitals. 1978 Jun 16;52(12):88-90.
10
A capital budget planning model for nonprofit hospitals.非营利性医院的资本预算规划模型。
Inquiry. 1978 Sep;15(3):234-45.

医疗保健行业的投资决策:未来

Investment decision making in the health care industry: the future.

作者信息

Long H W

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1979 Fall;14(3):183-205.

PMID:391771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1072115/
Abstract

The economic and political environment in which providers of health care will operate during the 1980s will continue to be increasingly restrictive. Any private-sector organization's long-run survival depends directly on the quality of its investment decisions, broadly defined. This decision making will require three major innovations if private sector health care providers are to survive: 1) traditional biases about the economics of not-for-profit entities must be abandoned; 2) standard data, procedures, and personnel from the accounting discipline must be supplemented with information, methodologies, and people from the discipline of corporate finance; and 3) economic and fiscal risk must be measured and incorporated into both investment decisions and interactions with external regulators. Practitioners can begin to implement these innovations immediately. Although substantial literature exists developing all these concepts generally and applying them to for-profit settings, the literature purporting to treat investment decision making for private-sector health care providers is, on average, replete with conceptual error, simplistic thinking, erroneous applications, and out-of-date methodologies. The literature is, in a word, horrid. Authors, both practitioner and academic, should stop writing terrible books and booklike periodicals for easy royalty dollars, and, instead, pursue sound applied research and disseminate their results in classrooms and in refereed journals.

摘要

20世纪80年代医疗保健服务提供者所处的经济和政治环境将继续受到越来越多的限制。任何私营部门组织的长期生存直接取决于其广义投资决策的质量。如果私营部门医疗保健服务提供者想要生存下去,这种决策需要三项重大创新:1)必须摒弃关于非营利性实体经济状况的传统偏见;2)会计学科的标准数据、程序和人员必须辅以公司财务学科的信息、方法和人员;3)必须对经济和财政风险进行衡量,并将其纳入投资决策以及与外部监管机构的互动之中。从业者可以立即开始实施这些创新。虽然有大量文献总体上阐述了所有这些概念,并将它们应用于营利性机构,但声称论述私营部门医疗保健服务提供者投资决策的文献,总体而言充斥着概念错误、简单化思维、错误应用和过时的方法。一言以蔽之,这些文献糟糕透顶。从业者和学者作者都不应再为了轻松获得版税而撰写糟糕的书籍和类似书籍的期刊文章,而应进行扎实的应用研究,并在课堂和同行评审期刊上传播研究成果。