Vraciu R A
Health Serv Res. 1980 Spring;15(1):35-52.
The literature on capital investment and financing decisions for hospitals has suggested several approaches to analyzing sets of options. In this paper, I present a taxonomy of the different approaches; analyze and compare the different elements of the taxonomy; and illustrate and discuss the information that can be gained by using each approach. I view these different analytic methods as complementary rather than competing methods of providing information to decision makers, and argue that the complex nature of hospital objectives demands the use of more than one approach. Failure to do this may lead to biased evaluations and poor decision making.
关于医院资本投资和融资决策的文献提出了几种分析选项集的方法。在本文中，我提出了不同方法的分类法；分析并比较了分类法的不同要素；举例说明了每种方法能够获取的信息并进行了讨论。我认为这些不同的分析方法是互补的，而非相互竞争的向决策者提供信息的方法，并主张医院目标的复杂性要求采用不止一种方法。不这样做可能会导致评估有偏差和决策不佳。
