Shireman Theresa I, Coulibaly Neto, Zhang Tingting, Zullo Andrew R, Gerlach Lauren B, Coe Antoinette B, Daiello Lori A, Lo Derrick, Bynum Julie P W
Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3742-3752. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19129. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
Federal policies targeting antipsychotic use among nursing home (NH) residents may have increased reporting of diagnoses for approved uses, including schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, and Huntington's Disease (called "exclusionary diagnoses" because they exclude residents from the antipsychotic quality metric). We assessed changes in new exclusionary diagnoses among long-stay NH admissions specifically with dementia following federal policies.
Retrospective, quarterly, interrupted time-series analysis (2009-2018) of new long-stay NH residents with dementia and no exclusionary diagnoses reported before NH admission. The National Partnership and the addition of facility level antipsychotic use to the Five Star Quality Rating system were key time exposures. Outcome was quarterly facility level predicted percentage of exclusionary diagnoses within 2 years of admission stratified by NH characteristics.
For 264,095 long-stay admissions, mean percentage of new exclusionary diagnoses was 2.2% before the Partnership. After the Partnership, there was an unadjusted increase in the percentage over time (slope change, 0.044, p = 0.018), but the percentage never exceeded 2.9%. The Partnership contributed to a one-time decrease in diagnoses in NHs with an intermediate percentage of Black residents (-1.29%, p = 0.004). Before the Partnership, diagnoses were increasing among not-for-profit relative to for-profit NHs (0.044; p = 0.012), but after the Partnership, the pattern reversed. For-profit NHs saw an increase (+0.034, p = 0.002); not-for-profit NHs experienced a decrease (-0.014, p = 0.039). Quality Rating modifications had no significant effect.
Exclusionary diagnosis reporting among long-stay NH residents with dementia, the group most at risk from antipsychotics, did not increase in response to federal policies. Evaluation of reasons for the observed increase in exclusionary diagnoses among non-dementia NH residents is warranted along with continued attention to how to incentivize the appropriate use of medications in residents with dementia that is crucial for high-quality NH care.
针对疗养院(NH)居民使用抗精神病药物的联邦政策可能增加了对包括精神分裂症、妥瑞氏症和亨廷顿舞蹈症等已批准用途诊断的报告(这些被称为“排除性诊断”,因为它们将居民排除在抗精神病药物质量指标之外)。我们评估了联邦政策实施后,长期入住NH且患有痴呆症的新入院患者中排除性诊断的变化情况。
对2009年至2018年期间新入住NH且患有痴呆症、入院前未报告排除性诊断的长期住院患者进行回顾性、季度性、中断时间序列分析。国家伙伴关系以及在五星级质量评级系统中增加机构层面的抗精神病药物使用情况是关键的时间暴露因素。结果是按NH特征分层的入院后2年内机构层面排除性诊断的季度预测百分比。
对于264,095例长期住院患者,在国家伙伴关系实施前,新排除性诊断的平均百分比为2.2%。国家伙伴关系实施后,该百分比随时间出现未经调整的增加(斜率变化,0.044,p = 0.018),但该百分比从未超过2.9%。国家伙伴关系导致黑人居民比例中等的NH中诊断一次性减少(-1.29%,p = 0.004)。在国家伙伴关系实施前,非营利性NH相对于营利性NH的诊断呈上升趋势(0.044;p = 0.012),但在国家伙伴关系实施后,这种模式发生了逆转。营利性NH出现增加(+0.034,p = 0.002);非营利性NH出现减少(-0.014,p = 0.039)。质量评级调整没有显著影响。
在最易受抗精神病药物影响的患有痴呆症的长期入住NH居民中,排除性诊断报告并未因联邦政策而增加。有必要评估非痴呆症NH居民中排除性诊断增加的原因,同时继续关注如何激励对患有痴呆症的居民合理用药,这对高质量的NH护理至关重要。