Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)植入对布加综合征患者等待名单死亡率及肝移植可及性的影响

Effect of TIPS insertion on waitlist mortality and access to liver transplantation in Budd-Chiari syndrome.

作者信息

Akabane Miho, Imaoka Yuki, Nakayama Toshihiro, Esquivel Carlos O, Sasaki Kazunari

机构信息

Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2025 Feb 1;31(2):151-160. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000469. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

Abstract

The impact of TIPS on waitlist mortality and liver transplantation (LT) urgency in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) remains unclear. We analyzed patients with BCS listed for LT in the UNOS database (2002-2024) to assess TIPS's impact on waitlist mortality and LT access through competing-risk analysis. We compared trends across 2 phases: phase 1 (2002-2011) and phase 2 (2012-2024). Of 815 patients with BCS, 263 (32.3%) received TIPS at listing. TIPS group had lower MELD-Na scores (20 vs. 22, p < 0.01), milder ascites ( p = 0.01), and fewer Status 1 patients (those at risk of imminent death while awaiting LT) (2.7% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.01) at listing compared to those without TIPS. TIPS patients had lower LT rates (43.3% vs. 56.5%, p < 0.01) and longer waitlist times (350 vs. 113 d, p < 0.01). TIPS use increased in phase 2 (64.3% vs. 35.7%, p < 0.01). Of 426 patients who underwent transplantation, 134 (31.5%) received TIPS, showing lower MELD-Na scores (24 vs. 27, p < 0.01) and better medical conditions (intensive care unit: 14.9% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.01) at LT. Status 1 patients were fewer (3.7% vs. 12.3%, p < 0.01), with longer waiting days (97 vs. 26 d, p < 0.01) in the TIPS group. TIPS use at listing increased from phase 1 (25.6%) to phase 2 (37.7%). From phase 1 to phase 2, ascites severity improved, re-LT cases decreased (phase 1: 9.8% vs. phase 2: 2.2%, p < 0.01), and cold ischemic time slightly decreased (phase 1: 7.0 vs. phase 2: 6.4 h, p = 0.14). Median donor body mass index significantly increased. No significant differences were identified in patient/graft survival at 1-/5-/10-year intervals between phases or TIPS/non-TIPS patients. While 90-day waitlist mortality showed no significant difference ( p = 0.11), TIPS trended toward lower mortality (subhazard ratio [sHR]: 0.70 [0.45-1.08]). Multivariable analysis indicated that TIPS was a significant factor in decreasing mortality (sHR: 0.45 [0.27-0.77], p < 0.01). TIPS group also showed significantly lower LT access (sHR: 0.65 [0.53-0.81], p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that TIPS was a significant factor in decreasing access to LT (sHR: 0.60 [0.46-0.77], p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis excluding Status 1 or HCC showed similar trends. TIPS in patients with BCS listed for LT reduces waitlist mortality and LT access, supporting its bridging role.

摘要

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)对布加综合征(BCS)患者等待名单上的死亡率和肝移植(LT)紧迫性的影响尚不清楚。我们分析了器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库(2002 - 2024年)中登记等待LT的BCS患者,通过竞争风险分析评估TIPS对等待名单上的死亡率和LT可及性的影响。我们比较了两个阶段的趋势:第1阶段(2002 - 2011年)和第2阶段(2012 - 2024年)。在815例BCS患者中,263例(32.3%)在登记时接受了TIPS。与未接受TIPS的患者相比,TIPS组在登记时的终末期肝病模型钠(MELD - Na)评分较低(20对22,p < 0.01),腹水较轻(p = 0.01),1类患者(等待LT时有即将死亡风险的患者)较少(2.7%对8.3%,p < 0.01)。TIPS患者的LT率较低(43.3%对56.5%,p < 0.01),等待名单时间较长(350对113天,p < 0.01)。TIPS的使用在第2阶段有所增加(64.3%对35.7%,p < 0.01)。在426例接受移植的患者中,134例(31.5%)接受了TIPS,这些患者在LT时的MELD - Na评分较低(24对27,p < 0.01),医疗状况较好(重症监护病房:14.9%对21.9%,p < 0.01)。TIPS组的1类患者较少(3.7%对12.3%,p < 0.01),等待天数较长(97对26天,p < 0.01)。登记时TIPS的使用从第1阶段(25.6%)增加到第2阶段(37.7%)。从第1阶段到第2阶段,腹水严重程度改善,再次LT病例减少(第1阶段:9.8%对第2阶段:2.2%,p < 0.01),冷缺血时间略有下降(第1阶段:7.0对第2阶段:6.4小时,p = 0.14)。供体体重指数中位数显著增加。在各阶段之间或TIPS/非TIPS患者之间,1年/5年/10年的患者/移植物生存率未发现显著差异。虽然90天等待名单死亡率无显著差异(p = 0.11),但TIPS有降低死亡率的趋势(亚风险比[sHR]:0.70[0.45 - 1.08])。多变量分析表明,TIPS是降低死亡率的一个重要因素(sHR:0.45[0.27 - 0.77],p < 0.01)。TIPS组的LT可及性也显著较低(sHR:0.65[0.53 - 0.81],p < 0.01)。多变量分析显示,TIPS是降低LT可及性的一个重要因素(sHR:0.60[0.46 - 0.77],p < 0.01)。排除1类患者或肝细胞癌的亚组分析显示了类似的趋势。登记等待LT的BCS患者使用TIPS可降低等待名单死亡率和LT可及性,支持其桥接作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验