• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在终末期肝病模型(MELD)3.0时代,肝移植机会和等待名单死亡率方面基于性别的差异是否有所改善?一项初步研究。

Has Sex-Based Disparity in Liver Transplantation Opportunities and Waitlist Mortality Improved in the MELD3.0 Era?: A Preliminary Study.

作者信息

Akabane Miho, Imaoka Yuki, Esquivel Carlos O, Sasaki Kazunari

机构信息

Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2025 Jan;39(1):e70064. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70064.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.70064
PMID:39737609
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In July 2023, the OPTN adopted MELD3.0 to address sex-based disparities in liver transplantation (LT) opportunity and waitlist mortality. No studies have proven that MELD3.0 alleviated them.

METHODS

We evaluated sex-based disparities in LT opportunities and waitlist mortality, utilizing the UNOS data (August 2022-March 2024), comparing pre- and post-MELD3.0 eras.

RESULTS

Among 11 795 LT candidates (pre-MELD3.0: 7263; post-MELD3.0: 4532), the proportion of females increased from 38.8% to 42.6% post-MELD3.0. In the transplanted population, females increased from 37.7% to 41.6% post-MELD3.0. The median MELD score difference ("MELD3.0-MELD-Na") at listing was -0.26 [-2.13, 0.80] for females and -0.86 [-2.92, 0.00] for males (p < 0.01). Compared to females, males consistently showed a larger drop in points from MELD-Na to MELD3.0. In the pre-MELD3.0 era, females had lower LT opportunity (sub-hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.88 [0.83-0.93], p < 0.01) and higher waitlist mortality (sHR: 1.39 [1.20-1.62], p < 0.01). In the post-MELD3.0 era, there were no significant differences in LT opportunity (sHR: 0.93 [0.87-1.00], p = 0.07) and waitlist mortality (sHR: 1.25 [0.98-1.57], p = 0.26). Subgroup analyses based on MELD-Na groups showed that significant differences in LT opportunity and waitlist mortality in the pre-MELD3.0 era became insignificant in the post-MELD3.0 era. Multivariable competing-risk analysis showed that, in the pre-MELD3.0 era, female sex was a significant risk factor for LT opportunity (sHR: 0.90 [0.84-0.96], p < 0.01) and waitlist mortality (sHR: 1.19 [1.01-1.38], p = 0.03), but in the post-MELD3.0 era, it was not significant (sHR: 0.94 [0.86-1.02], p = 0.11 for LT opportunity/sHR: 1.08 [0.83-1.40], p = 0.57 for waitlist mortality).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary findings suggest that MELD3.0 has the potential to reduce sex-based disparities in LT opportunities and waitlist mortality.

摘要

背景

2023年7月,器官共享联合网络(OPTN)采用了终末期肝病模型3.0(MELD3.0)来解决肝移植(LT)机会和等待名单死亡率方面的性别差异问题。尚无研究证明MELD3.0缓解了这些差异。

方法

我们利用器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的数据(2022年8月至2024年3月),比较MELD3.0时代前后,评估LT机会和等待名单死亡率方面的性别差异。

结果

在11795例LT候选者中(MELD3.0之前:7263例;MELD3.0之后:4532例),MELD3.0之后女性的比例从38.8%增至42.6%。在移植人群中,MELD3.0之后女性从37.7%增至41.6%。登记时女性的中位MELD评分差值(“MELD3.0 - MELD - Na”)为 -0.26 [-2.13, 0.80],男性为 -0.86 [-2.92, 0.00](p < 0.01)。与女性相比,男性从MELD - Na到MELD3.0的评分降幅始终更大。在MELD3.0之前的时代,女性LT机会较低(亚风险比[sHR]:0.88 [0.83 - 0.93],p < 0.01)且等待名单死亡率较高(sHR:1.39 [1.20 - 1.62],p < 0.01)。在MELD3.0之后的时代,LT机会(sHR:0.93 [0.87 - 1.00],p = 0.07)和等待名单死亡率(sHR:1.25 [0.98 - 1.57],p = 0.26)无显著差异。基于MELD - Na分组的亚组分析显示,MELD3.0之前时代LT机会和等待名单死亡率的显著差异在MELD3.0之后时代变得不显著。多变量竞争风险分析显示,在MELD3.0之前的时代,女性性别是LT机会(sHR:0.90 [0.84 - 0.96],p < 0.01)和等待名单死亡率(sHR:1.19 [1.01 - 1.38],p = 0.03)的显著风险因素,但在MELD3.0之后的时代则不显著(LT机会的sHR:|0.94 [0.86 - 1.02],p = 0.11/等待名单死亡率的sHR:1.08 [0.83 - 1.40],p = 0.57)。

结论

我们的初步研究结果表明,MELD3.0有可能减少LT机会和等待名单死亡率方面的性别差异。

相似文献

1
Has Sex-Based Disparity in Liver Transplantation Opportunities and Waitlist Mortality Improved in the MELD3.0 Era?: A Preliminary Study.在终末期肝病模型(MELD)3.0时代,肝移植机会和等待名单死亡率方面基于性别的差异是否有所改善?一项初步研究。
Clin Transplant. 2025 Jan;39(1):e70064. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70064.
2
Racial-ethnic differences in liver transplant waitlist outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before and after recent changes to allocation policy.种族和民族差异在肝癌患者肝移植候补名单结果中的作用:在分配政策最近改变前后。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Jun;38(6):e15365. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15365.
3
The suggestion of mitigating disparity in the liver transplantation field among ABO blood type.提出减少 ABO 血型肝移植领域差异的建议。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Dec;24(12):2235-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.06.004. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Predicted Impact of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 in a Region Suffering Severe Organ Shortage.终末期肝病模型 3.0 在一个严重器官短缺地区的预测影响。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep 4;38(35):e274. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e274.
5
Body Size Remains the Major Source of Sex Disparity Despite Updated Liver Transplant Allocation Policies.尽管肝脏移植分配政策有所更新,但体型仍是性别差异的主要来源。
Transplantation. 2024 Dec 1;108(12):e396-e403. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005142. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
6
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Effect of TIPS insertion on waitlist mortality and access to liver transplantation in Budd-Chiari syndrome.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)植入对布加综合征患者等待名单死亡率及肝移植可及性的影响
Liver Transpl. 2025 Feb 1;31(2):151-160. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000469. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
8
The impact of sex and body mass index in liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure.性别和体重指数对慢性肝衰竭急性发作肝移植的影响。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Feb;32(2):102-113. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12100. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
9
Variation in intention-to-treat survival by MELD subtypes: All models created for end-stage liver disease are not equal.终末期肝病模型(MELD)各亚型意向性治疗生存率的差异:为终末期肝病建立的所有模型并不相同。
J Hepatol. 2025 Feb;82(2):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
10
End-stage liver disease patients with MELD >40 have higher waitlist mortality compared to Status 1A patients.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分>40的终末期肝病患者与1A类患者相比,等待名单上的死亡率更高。
Hepatol Int. 2016 Sep;10(5):838-46. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9735-4. Epub 2016 May 24.