Carter R L
Invest Cell Pathol. 1978 Jul-Sep;1(3):275-86.
The term 'metastatic potential' is examined, together with some of the factors that may contribute to it. The evidence is drawn from clinical and experimental sources. Morphological factors include the site of the tumour, its size, histological appearances and pattern of local spread. The scope and limitations of each are discussed and the potential application of newer morphological techniques is noted. Certain non-morphological factors are considered: these are (1) the functional heterogeneity of tumour cell populations with resepct to the metastatic capacity; (2) the elaboration of certain tumour-associated products which may potentiate tumour spread; and (3) immunological factors in the form of local host cell infiltrates in and around primary tumours. The tumour-associated products include collagenases, prostaglandins and angiogenesis factor; their likely origin from tumour and host cells is stressed, together with their implications in physiological and pathological processes other than neoplasia. It is concluded that the metastatic potential of tumours cannot be assessed in the terms of conventional tumour pathology alone. A more functional approach is needed before the term 'metastatic potential' acquires solid conceptual or practical value.
本文探讨了“转移潜能”这一术语,并分析了一些可能导致转移潜能的因素。证据来源于临床和实验研究。形态学因素包括肿瘤的位置、大小、组织学表现以及局部扩散模式。本文讨论了每种因素的范围和局限性,并指出了更新的形态学技术的潜在应用。本文还考虑了某些非形态学因素:(1)肿瘤细胞群体在转移能力方面的功能异质性;(2)某些可能促进肿瘤扩散的肿瘤相关产物的产生;(3)以原发性肿瘤内部和周围局部宿主细胞浸润形式存在的免疫因素。肿瘤相关产物包括胶原酶、前列腺素和血管生成因子;强调了它们可能起源于肿瘤细胞和宿主细胞,并阐述了它们在肿瘤形成以外的生理和病理过程中的意义。本文得出结论,肿瘤的转移潜能不能仅根据传统肿瘤病理学来评估。在“转移潜能”这一术语获得坚实的概念或实际价值之前,需要一种更具功能性的方法。