Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Nov 1;38(11):1885-1890. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004896. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
Padrón-Cabo, A, Alonso-Calvete, A, Radzimiński, Ł, Rey, E, and Lorenzo-Martínez, M. Acute Effects of foam rolling vs. vibration foam rolling on blood flow parameters in professional soccer players: a randomized crossover design. J Strength Cond Res 38(11): 1885-1890, 2024-The study aimed to compare the effects of foam roller (FR) and vibration foam roller (VFR) on blood flow parameters, measured by Doppler ultrasonography in professional soccer players. A randomized crossover design was used, and 10 professional soccer players participated in 3 experimental sessions: FR, VFR, and a control condition (CC). The maximum velocity (MVel) and maximum volume (MVol) blood flow parameters were measured in the common femoral artery of the dominant leg at 5 different time points as follows: before (pre), immediately after (post 0'), 10 (post 10'), 20 (post 20'), and 30 minutes (post 30') after the intervention. Both FR and VFR involved two 45-second sets with 15-second rest between sets in the quadriceps and hamstring, while CC required sitting for 240 seconds. The FR condition showed a significant increase in MVel ( p < 0.01) at all time points after the intervention, and an increase in MVol ( p < 0.05) only at post 0' compared with pre. The VFR condition showed a significant ( p < 0.05) increase in MVel at post 0' and post 10' and an increase ( p < 0.05) in MVol at post 0' compared with pre. In comparison with CC, the FR and VFR conditions presented significantly ( p < 0.05) higher MVel values at post 0', post 10', post 20', and post 30' than CC. For both FR and VFR conditions, the MVol not only revealed a significant ( p < 0.05) increase at post 0' but also at post 10' for VFR compared with CC. In summary, the FR and VFR interventions demonstrated a similar increase in blood flow parameters, suggesting that both strategies may accelerate physiological recovery in elite soccer players.
帕德龙-卡博、阿隆索-卡尔维特、拉齐米尼斯基、雷和洛伦佐-马丁内斯。泡沫轴滚压与振动泡沫轴滚压对职业足球运动员血流参数的急性影响：一项随机交叉设计。《力量与调节研究杂志》38（11）：1885-1890，2024 年-本研究旨在比较泡沫轴（FR）和振动泡沫轴（VFR）对职业足球运动员股动脉血流参数的影响，这些参数通过多普勒超声测量。采用随机交叉设计，10 名职业足球运动员参加了 3 次实验：FR、VFR 和对照条件（CC）。在优势腿的股总动脉处，在 5 个不同时间点测量最大速度（MVel）和最大容积（MVol）血流参数，如下：干预前（pre）、干预后即刻（post 0'）、10 分钟后（post 10'）、20 分钟后（post 20'）和 30 分钟后（post 30'）。FR 和 VFR 均涉及两组 45 秒的间隔，两组之间间隔 15 秒，分别在股四头肌和腘绳肌上进行，而 CC 需要静坐 240 秒。FR 条件在干预后所有时间点的 MVel 均显著增加（p<0.01），与 pre 相比，仅在 post 0'时 MVol 增加（p<0.05）。VFR 条件在 post 0'和 post 10'时 MVel 显著增加（p<0.05），与 pre 相比，在 post 0'时 MVol 增加（p<0.05）。与 CC 相比，FR 和 VFR 条件在 post 0'、post 10'、post 20'和 post 30'时的 MVel 值均显著升高（p<0.05）。对于 FR 和 VFR 两种条件，MVol 不仅在 post 0'时显著增加（p<0.05），而且在 VFR 时在 post 10'时也显著增加（p<0.05），与 CC 相比。总之，FR 和 VFR 干预均显示血流参数相似的增加，表明这两种策略都可能加速精英足球运动员的生理恢复。
