Flannery Layne, Secomb Josh L, West Millicent A, Compton Heidi R, Dascombe Ben J
Applied Sport Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, Australia.
Active Living and Learning Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Dec 1;38(12):2129-2135. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004916. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
Flannery, L, Secomb, JL, West, MA, Compton, HR, and Dascombe, BJ. The strength and power profile of junior and senior female rugby league athletes. J Strength Cond Res 38(12): 2129-2135, 2024-The purpose of this study was to compare the lower-body strength and power profiles of the various female rugby league (RL) competition levels, thereby establishing normative data for these athletes. Seventy-nine female RL athletes from 3 different competition levels: junior-state ( n = 45, age: 17.5 ± 0.6 years), senior-state ( n = 15, age: 24.3 ± 3.7 years), and senior-national ( n = 19, age: 25.4 ± 4.0 years) participated in this study. All testing was completed in a single session at the beginning of preseason, with the following assessments performed: countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), and bilateral and unilateral isometric hip adduction and abduction strength. One-way analyses of variance with Bonferroni post hoc analyses, revealed that junior-state athletes exhibited significantly lower IMTP peak force (PF) and relative PF (rPF), and CMJ height compared with the senior-state and senior-national athletes. Importantly, senior-national athletes demonstrated significantly greater body mass (80.9 ± 14.6 kg) than senior-state athletes (70.9 ± 8.1 kg), but no significant differences were identified between these athletes for any IMTP or CMJ measure. Finally, the senior-national athletes possessed significantly lower unilateral hip adduction rPF (0.13 ± 0.04 N·BW -1 ) and adduction to abduction strength ratio (0.92 ± 0.14) than senior-state athletes (0.17 ± 0.03 N·BW -1 and 1.04 ± 0.13, respectively), which may have implications for noncontact lower-body injury risk. This study highlights the importance of practitioners prescribing training to increase the lower-body strength and power of junior-state RL athletes. Whereas, for senior-state athletes progressing to senior-national levels, the focus should on maintaining or improving relative strength and power, while increasing their body mass to enhance preparedness for the greater contact demands at that level.
弗兰纳里、L、西科姆、JL、韦斯特、MA、康普顿、HR和达斯combe、BJ。青少年和成年女子橄榄球联盟运动员的力量和功率概况。《力量与体能研究杂志》38(12):2129 - 2135,2024年——本研究的目的是比较不同女子橄榄球联盟(RL)比赛水平的下肢力量和功率概况,从而为这些运动员建立规范数据。来自3个不同比赛水平的79名女子RL运动员:青少年州级(n = 45,年龄:17.5±0.6岁)、成年州级(n = 15,年龄:24.3±3.7岁)和成年国家级(n = 19,年龄:25.4±4.0岁)参与了本研究。所有测试均在季前赛开始时的一次训练中完成,进行了以下评估:反向纵跳(CMJ)、等长中大腿拉伸(IMTP)以及双侧和单侧等长髋关节内收和外展力量。采用Bonferroni事后分析的单因素方差分析显示,与成年州级和成年国家级运动员相比,青少年州级运动员的IMTP峰值力(PF)和相对PF(rPF)以及CMJ高度显著更低。重要的是,成年国家级运动员的体重(80.9±14.6千克)显著高于成年州级运动员(70.9±8.1千克),但在任何IMTP或CMJ测量中,这些运动员之间未发现显著差异。最后,成年国家级运动员的单侧髋关节内收rPF(0.13±0.04牛·体重-1)和内收与外展力量比(0.92±0.14)显著低于成年州级运动员(分别为0.17±0.03牛·体重-1和1.04±0.13),这可能对非接触性下肢受伤风险有影响。本研究强调了从业者制定训练计划以增加青少年州级RL运动员下肢力量和功率的重要性。而对于从成年州级运动员晋升到成年国家级水平的运动员,重点应放在保持或提高相对力量和功率上,同时增加体重以增强对该水平更高对抗要求的准备。