Suppr超能文献

探讨 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变类型和位置对铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌患者奥拉帕利维持治疗的影响:单中心报告。

Exploring the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation type and location on Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian Cancer patients: A single center report.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Nov;190:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.08.012. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) harboring pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, olaparib maintenance monotherapy (OMT) is a viable option. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of different BRCA1/2 PV in survival outcomes and safety of OMT in BRCA1/2-mutated PSROC patients, focusing on the type and location of PV.

METHODS

We assessed the outcomes of 100 BRCA1/2-mutated PSROC patients treated at our institute, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Germline and tumor BRCA1/2 genotyping was conducted using Illumina's next-generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

PFS and OS were significantly shorter in PSROC patients with PV in BRCA1 compared to those with PV in BRCA2 (PFS:14.0 vs. 38.8 months, p = 0.007, OS: 21.8 vs. 62.0 months, p = 0.011). Notably, there was a significant difference in PFS based on the intragenic location of BRCA1 PV, with shorter PFS in patients with 1st/2nd relapse, harboring PV in BRCA1 RING domain compared to those with PV in the DNA binding domain (DBD) and BRCT domains (12.4 vs. 23.0 months, p = 0.046). No differences in PFS and OS were observed between patients with germline versus somatic BRCA1/2 PV (PFS:14.9 vs.19.3, p = 0.316, OS: not reached vs. 25.8 months; p = 0.224). However, there were significant differences in the reasons for OMT discontinuation between patients with germline and somatic BRCA1/2 PV, primarily due to adverse side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the type and location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV provide additional insight into the expected survival outcomes of olaparib MT in PSROC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN42408038, Name of registry: ISRCTN registry, Date of registration: 24/11/2015.

摘要

目的

在携带 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因致病性/可能致病性变异(PV)的铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌(PSROC)患者中,奥拉帕利维持单药治疗(OMT)是一种可行的选择。我们的研究旨在评估不同 BRCA1/2 PV 对 BRCA1/2 突变 PSROC 患者 OMT 生存结局和安全性的影响,重点关注 PV 的类型和位置。

方法

我们评估了在我院治疗的 100 例 BRCA1/2 突变 PSROC 患者的结局,分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。使用 Illumina 的下一代测序(NGS)对胚系和肿瘤 BRCA1/2 进行基因分型。

结果

与 BRCA2 相比,BRCA1 中存在 PV 的 PSROC 患者的 PFS 和 OS 明显更短(PFS:14.0 与 38.8 个月,p=0.007,OS:21.8 与 62.0 个月,p=0.011)。值得注意的是,BRCA1 PV 的基因内位置对 PFS 有显著影响,BRCA1 RING 结构域中存在 PV 的患者 PFS 更短,而 DNA 结合域(DBD)和 BRCT 结构域中存在 PV 的患者 PFS 更长(12.4 与 23.0 个月,p=0.046)。胚系与体细胞 BRCA1/2 PV 患者的 PFS 和 OS 无差异(PFS:14.9 与 19.3,p=0.316,OS:未达到与 25.8 个月;p=0.224)。然而,胚系与体细胞 BRCA1/2 PV 患者 OMT 停药的原因存在显著差异,主要是由于不良反应。

结论

综上所述,BRCA1 和 BRCA2 的类型和位置为 PSROC 患者奥拉帕利 MT 的预期生存结局提供了更多的见解。

试验注册号

ISRCTN42408038,注册机构名称:ISRCTN 注册中心,注册日期:2015 年 11 月 24 日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验