• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“吸引你的眼睛和大脑”:用心力衰竭患者共享决策的可视化方法进行改进。

"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients.

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, United States.

Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):1013-1024. doi: 10.1055/a-2402-5832. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1055/a-2402-5832
PMID:39178891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11617074/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying the results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication.

METHODS

We conducted 32 semistructured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a β-blocker. Interviews were conducted in person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach a consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool.

RESULTS

Nine participants provided feedback on how their data were displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: (1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, (2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and (3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse).

CONCLUSION

Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.

摘要

背景

N-of-1 试验作为一种以患者为中心的个性化方法,已经崭露头角,患者可以使用自己的数据来比较基于证据的治疗方法。然而,对于如何向患者展示与药物相关的 N-of-1 试验的个体数据,以促进决策,人们知之甚少。

目的

我们对接受 N-of-1 试验的射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者进行了定性访谈,以迭代、完善和优化一种用于显示 N-of-1 药物试验结果的面向患者的数据可视化工具。优化该工具的目的是促进患者对自身健康信息的理解,最终促进关于继续或停止药物治疗的共同决策。

方法

我们对 9 名参与者进行了 32 次半结构化定性访谈,这些参与者在接受 N-of-1 试验的过程中参与了试验。进行 N-of-1 试验是为了促进比较继续或停止使用β受体阻滞剂。在每个治疗期结束后,通过面对面或电话进行访谈,评估参与者对数据可视化工具原型的看法。数据由两位独立审查员使用定向内容分析进行编码,如果需要,还包括第三位审查员达成共识。提取主要主题并将其迭代纳入面向患者的数据可视化工具。

结果

9 名参与者就可视化工具中如何显示其数据提供了反馈。经过定性分析,出现了三个主要主题,为我们的最终界面提供了信息。参与者更喜欢:(1)清楚说明个体症状评分,(2)带有标签的参考图像,以指导他们对症状信息的解释,以及(3)定性语言而不是仅用数字传达他们分数变化的含义(例如,更好,更差)。

结论

反馈为药物相关 N-of-1 试验的面向患者的数据可视化工具的设计提供了信息。未来的工作应包括在更大范围内对该界面的可用性和理解进行测试。

相似文献

1
"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients.“吸引你的眼睛和大脑”:用心力衰竭患者共享决策的可视化方法进行改进。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):1013-1024. doi: 10.1055/a-2402-5832. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
5
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
10
Patient decision-making in the era of transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建时代的患者决策。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):125-135.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.035. Epub 2024 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.共同决策与心血管健康:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2023 Sep 12;148(11):912-931. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001162. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
2
N-of-1 trials: The epitome of personalized medicine?单病例试验:个性化医疗的典范?
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jul 3;7(1):e161. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.583. eCollection 2023.
3
A RE-AIM Evaluation of a Visualization-Based Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System.基于可视化的电子患者报告结局系统的再评价研究
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):227-237. doi: 10.1055/a-2008-4036. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Impact of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic on Clinician Health Status Assessment and Patient Experience: A Substudy of the PRO-HF Trial.心力衰竭门诊中患者报告结局测量对临床医生健康状况评估和患者体验的影响:PRO-HF 试验的子研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;16(2):e010280. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010280. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
5
Impact of Patient Engagement on Healthcare Quality: A Scoping Review.患者参与对医疗质量的影响:一项范围综述
J Patient Exp. 2022 Sep 16;9:23743735221125439. doi: 10.1177/23743735221125439. eCollection 2022.
6
N-of-1 trials to facilitate evidence-based deprescribing: Rationale and case study.N-of-1 试验促进基于证据的药物精简:原理与案例研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;88(10):4460-4473. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15442. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.患者与临床医生在预防保健决策中的协作和共同决策,以及美国预防服务工作组的建议。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 22;327(12):1171-1176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.3267.
8
Individualized Studies of Triggers of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The I-STOP-AFib Randomized Clinical Trial.阵发性心房颤动触发因素的个体化研究:I-STOP-AFib 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):167-174. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5010.
9
Developing an educational resource for parents on pediatric catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention.为家长开发关于小儿导管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)预防的教育资源。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Apr;50(4):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
10
Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process.定向定性内容分析:对其基础方法和数据分析过程的描述与阐述。
J Res Nurs. 2018 Feb;23(1):42-55. doi: 10.1177/1744987117741667. Epub 2018 Jan 10.