文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

“吸引你的眼睛和大脑”:用心力衰竭患者共享决策的可视化方法进行改进。

"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients.

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, United States.

Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):1013-1024. doi: 10.1055/a-2402-5832. Epub 2024 Aug 23.


DOI:10.1055/a-2402-5832
PMID:39178891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11617074/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making. OBJECTIVES: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying the results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication. METHODS: We conducted 32 semistructured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a β-blocker. Interviews were conducted in person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach a consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool. RESULTS: Nine participants provided feedback on how their data were displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: (1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, (2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and (3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse). CONCLUSION: Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.

摘要

背景:N-of-1 试验作为一种以患者为中心的个性化方法,已经崭露头角,患者可以使用自己的数据来比较基于证据的治疗方法。然而,对于如何向患者展示与药物相关的 N-of-1 试验的个体数据,以促进决策,人们知之甚少。

目的:我们对接受 N-of-1 试验的射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者进行了定性访谈,以迭代、完善和优化一种用于显示 N-of-1 药物试验结果的面向患者的数据可视化工具。优化该工具的目的是促进患者对自身健康信息的理解,最终促进关于继续或停止药物治疗的共同决策。

方法:我们对 9 名参与者进行了 32 次半结构化定性访谈,这些参与者在接受 N-of-1 试验的过程中参与了试验。进行 N-of-1 试验是为了促进比较继续或停止使用β受体阻滞剂。在每个治疗期结束后,通过面对面或电话进行访谈,评估参与者对数据可视化工具原型的看法。数据由两位独立审查员使用定向内容分析进行编码,如果需要,还包括第三位审查员达成共识。提取主要主题并将其迭代纳入面向患者的数据可视化工具。

结果:9 名参与者就可视化工具中如何显示其数据提供了反馈。经过定性分析,出现了三个主要主题,为我们的最终界面提供了信息。参与者更喜欢:(1)清楚说明个体症状评分,(2)带有标签的参考图像,以指导他们对症状信息的解释,以及(3)定性语言而不是仅用数字传达他们分数变化的含义(例如,更好,更差)。

结论:反馈为药物相关 N-of-1 试验的面向患者的数据可视化工具的设计提供了信息。未来的工作应包括在更大范围内对该界面的可用性和理解进行测试。

相似文献

[1]
"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients.

Appl Clin Inform. 2024-10

[2]
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025-1-1

[3]
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-3

[4]
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-2

[5]
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-7-30

[6]
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-6

[7]
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.

Syst Rev. 2024-11-26

[8]
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-4

[9]
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-10-5

[10]
Patient decision-making in the era of transcarotid artery revascularization.

J Vasc Surg. 2024-7

本文引用的文献

[1]
Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Circulation. 2023-9-12

[2]
N-of-1 trials: The epitome of personalized medicine?

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023-7-3

[3]
A RE-AIM Evaluation of a Visualization-Based Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System.

Appl Clin Inform. 2023-3

[4]
Impact of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic on Clinician Health Status Assessment and Patient Experience: A Substudy of the PRO-HF Trial.

Circ Heart Fail. 2023-2

[5]
Impact of Patient Engagement on Healthcare Quality: A Scoping Review.

J Patient Exp. 2022-9-16

[6]
N-of-1 trials to facilitate evidence-based deprescribing: Rationale and case study.

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022-10

[7]
Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

JAMA. 2022-3-22

[8]
Individualized Studies of Triggers of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The I-STOP-AFib Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Cardiol. 2022-2-1

[9]
Developing an educational resource for parents on pediatric catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention.

Am J Infect Control. 2022-4

[10]
Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process.

J Res Nurs. 2018-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索