Health Research Institute, University of Canberra Faculty of Health, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Health Research Institute, University of Canberra Faculty of Health, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 22;14(8):e080078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080078.
Proof-of-concept (PoC) development is a key step in implementation sciences. However, there is a dearth of studies in this area and the use of this term in health and social sciences is ambiguous.
The objective was to remove the ambiguity surrounding the PoC and pilot study stage in the research development process using a standard system to rate the development of projects and applications provided by the Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) framework.
Mapping review and critical analysis using TRL as the standard measure.
PubMed and PsycInfo databases were searched for papers that reported PoC studies of mental health interventions up to August 2023. Data were extracted, described and tabulated.
Included were PoC studies in mental health implementation research. Exclusion criteria were research relating to biomedical (drugs) development, neurocognitive tools, neuropsychology, medical devices, literature reviews or discussion papers or that did not include the term 'proof-of-concept' in the title, abstract or text.
From the 83 citations generated from the database search, 22 studies were included in this mapping review. Based on the study title, abstract and text, studies were categorised by research development stage according to the TRL framework. This review showed 95% of the studies used PoC incorrectly to describe the development stage of their research but which were not at this specific level of project development.
The TRL was a useful reference framework to improve terminological clarity around the term 'proof-of-concept' in implementation research. To extend the use of TRL in implementation sciences, this framework has now been adapted and validated to a health and social science-related research context accompanied by a health-related glossary of research process terms and definitions to promote a common vocabulary and shared understanding in implementation sciences.
概念验证(PoC)开发是实施科学中的关键步骤。然而,该领域的研究很少,并且“概念验证”一词在健康和社会科学中的使用存在歧义。
本研究旨在使用标准系统(即技术就绪水平(TRL)框架提供的项目和应用开发等级)消除研究开发过程中概念验证和初步研究阶段的模糊性。
采用 TRL 作为标准衡量标准进行映射审查和批判性分析。
截至 2023 年 8 月,在 PubMed 和 PsycInfo 数据库中搜索报告心理健康干预措施概念验证研究的论文。提取、描述和制表数据。
纳入的是心理健康实施研究中的概念验证研究。排除标准为与生物医学(药物)开发、神经认知工具、神经心理学、医疗器械、文献综述或讨论文件相关的研究,或标题、摘要或文本中未包含“概念验证”一词的研究。
从数据库搜索生成的 83 条引文中,有 22 项研究纳入本次映射综述。根据研究标题、摘要和文本,根据 TRL 框架,按照研究开发阶段对研究进行分类。本综述表明,95%的研究错误地使用概念验证来描述其研究的开发阶段,但实际上并未达到该特定项目开发水平。
TRL 是一个有用的参考框架,可以提高实施研究中“概念验证”一词的术语清晰度。为了在实施科学中扩展 TRL 的使用,该框架现已针对健康和社会科学相关研究背景进行了调整和验证,并附有与健康相关的研究过程术语和定义词汇表,以促进实施科学中的通用词汇和共识。