• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言的进化动态

The evolutionary dynamics of language.

作者信息

Steels Luc, Szathmáry Eörs

机构信息

ICREA, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (UPF-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.

Parmenides Center for the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Pullach, Munich, Germany, Germany; Evolutionary Systems Research Group, MTA Ecological Research Centre, the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Tihany, Hungary.

出版信息

Biosystems. 2018 Feb;164:128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.11.003
PMID:29122586
Abstract

The well-established framework of evolutionary dynamics can be applied to the fascinating open problems how human brains are able to acquire and adapt language and how languages change in a population. Schemas for handling grammatical constructions are the replicating unit. They emerge and multiply with variation in the brains of individuals and undergo selection based on their contribution to needed expressive power, communicative success and the reduction of cognitive effort. Adopting this perspective has two major benefits. (i) It makes a bridge to neurobiological models of the brain that have also adopted an evolutionary dynamics point of view, thus opening a new horizon for studying how human brains achieve the remarkably complex competence for language. And (ii) it suggests a new foundation for studying cultural language change as an evolutionary dynamics process. The paper sketches this novel perspective, provides references to empirical data and computational experiments, and points to open problems.

摘要

进化动力学的既定框架可应用于两个引人入胜的开放性问题

人类大脑如何习得和适应语言,以及语言在群体中如何变化。处理语法结构的模式是复制单元。它们在个体大脑中随着变异而出现和增殖,并根据其对所需表达能力、交际成功以及认知努力减少的贡献而接受选择。采用这种观点有两个主要好处。(i)它为同样采用进化动力学观点的大脑神经生物学模型架起了一座桥梁,从而为研究人类大脑如何实现极其复杂的语言能力开辟了新视野。(ii)它为将文化语言变化作为进化动力学过程进行研究提供了新的基础。本文概述了这一新颖观点,提供了实证数据和计算实验的参考文献,并指出了开放性问题。

相似文献

1
The evolutionary dynamics of language.语言的进化动态
Biosystems. 2018 Feb;164:128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
2
Human language is a culturally evolving system.人类语言是一种在文化中不断演变的系统。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb;24(1):190-193. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1086-6.
3
Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework.构建原始语言:基于使用的构式语法框架重建史前语言。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 May 10;376(1824):20200200. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0200. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Agent-based models for the emergence and evolution of grammar.基于主体的语法出现与演变模型。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 19;371(1701). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0447.
5
Toward the Language-Ready Brain: Biological Evolution and Primate Comparisons.迈向具备语言能力的大脑:生物进化与灵长类动物比较
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb;24(1):142-150. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1098-2.
6
Biological adaptations for functional features of language in the face of cultural evolution.面对文化进化时语言功能特征的生物适应性。
Hum Biol. 2011 Apr;83(2):247-59. doi: 10.3378/027.083.0206.
7
Semiotic systems with duality of patterning and the issue of cultural replicators.具有双重模式的符号系统与文化复制因子问题。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2017 Nov 14;40(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s40656-017-0167-9.
8
Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems.文化选择驱动人类交流系统的演化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 7;281(1788):20140488. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0488.
9
Computational and evolutionary aspects of language.语言的计算与进化方面
Nature. 2002 Jun 6;417(6889):611-7. doi: 10.1038/nature00771.
10
Introduction: integrating genetic and cultural evolutionary approaches to language.引言:整合基因与文化进化方法研究语言
Hum Biol. 2011 Apr;83(2):141-51. doi: 10.3378/027.083.0201.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping review of 'proof-of-concept' in mental health implementation research using the TRL framework: a need for a better focus and conceptual clarification.基于 TRL 框架的精神卫生实施研究中“概念验证”的映射评价:需要更好的聚焦和概念澄清。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 22;14(8):e080078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080078.
2
How Has COVID-19 Impacted Our Language Use?新冠疫情如何影响我们的语言使用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13836. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113836.
3
The FCG Editor: An innovative environment for engineering computational construction grammars.
FCG 编辑器:用于工程计算构建语法的创新环境。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269708. eCollection 2022.
4
Conceptual Similarity and Communicative Need Shape Colexification: An Experimental Study.概念相似性和交际需求塑造类符化:一项实验研究。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Sep;45(9):e13035. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13035.
5
An evolutionary process without variation and selection.没有变异和选择的进化过程。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Jul;18(180):20210334. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0334. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Novelty and imitation within the brain: a Darwinian neurodynamic approach to combinatorial problems.大脑中的新奇与模仿:组合问题的达尔文神经动力学方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 15;11(1):12513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91489-5.
7
Guest Editorial Special Issue on Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Mechanisms of Language Learning.特邀社论:关于语言学习机制的多学科视角特刊
IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst. 2020 Jun;12(2):134-138. doi: 10.1109/tcds.2020.2991470. Epub 2020 Jun 10.