Hosoo Hisayuki, Ito Yoshiro, Hirata Koji, Hayakawa Mikito, Marushima Aiki, Masumoto Tomohiko, Yamagami Hiroshi, Matsumaru Yuji
From the Department of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (H.H., Y.I., K,H., A.M., H.Y., Y.M.), University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
Division of Stroke Prevention and Treatment (H.H., H.Y.), University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Feb 3;46(2):285-292. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8472.
Flat panel conebeam CT (CBCT) is essential for detecting hemorrhagic complications during neuroendovascular treatments. Despite its superior image quality and trajectory over conventional CBCT (circular scan), the dual-axis butterfly scan has a slightly higher radiation dose relative to conventional CBCT. This study evaluates the image quality in dose-reduction mode to uncover the appropriate radiation dose for the butterfly scan.
We prospectively included patients who were scheduled for neuroendovascular treatment and underwent conventional CBCT and the dose-reduction mode of the butterfly scan. Two reduced radiation dose modes were used for the butterfly scan: medium-dose butterfly scan (70% of the original dose, 45 mGy) or low-dose butterfly scan (50% of the original dose, 30 mGy). The enrolled patients were assigned alternately to undergo either the medium- or low-dose butterfly scan. We evaluated and compared artifacts, contrast, and discrimination of the corticomedullary junction between conventional CBCT and one of the dose-reduction modes of the butterfly scan, with a 5-point scale scoring system.
Twenty patients were enrolled in each of the medium- and low-dose groups, totaling 40 patients. Compared with conventional CBCT, the medium-dose butterfly group exhibited reduced artifacts, enhanced contrast, and corticomedullary junction discrimination (except in the occipital lobe). While the low-dose butterfly group exhibited markedly reduced artifacts and improved contrast (except in the occipital lobe), a significant improvement in corticomedullary junction discrimination was not observed.
Even with dose reduction, the specialized trajectory of the butterfly scan enables artifact reduction, contrast improvement, and enhanced corticomedullary junction discrimination. However, the impact of the reduced dose was more noticeable, particularly in the occipital region where susceptibility to bone interference resulted in decreased contrast and compromised corticomedullary junction discrimination.
平板锥形束CT(CBCT)对于检测神经血管内治疗期间的出血性并发症至关重要。尽管双轴蝴蝶扫描相对于传统CBCT(圆形扫描)具有更高的图像质量和扫描轨迹,但与传统CBCT相比,其辐射剂量略高。本研究评估了剂量降低模式下的图像质量,以确定蝴蝶扫描的合适辐射剂量。
我们前瞻性纳入计划接受神经血管内治疗并接受传统CBCT和蝴蝶扫描剂量降低模式的患者。蝴蝶扫描使用两种降低辐射剂量模式:中剂量蝴蝶扫描(原始剂量的70%,45 mGy)或低剂量蝴蝶扫描(原始剂量的50%,30 mGy)。入选患者交替接受中剂量或低剂量蝴蝶扫描。我们使用5分制评分系统评估并比较了传统CBCT与蝴蝶扫描的一种剂量降低模式之间的伪影、对比度和皮质髓质交界区分辨率。
中剂量组和低剂量组各纳入20例患者,共40例患者。与传统CBCT相比,中剂量蝴蝶扫描组的伪影减少、对比度增强,皮质髓质交界区分辨率提高(枕叶除外)。虽然低剂量蝴蝶扫描组的伪影明显减少,对比度改善(枕叶除外),但皮质髓质交界区分辨率未观察到显著改善。
即使降低剂量,蝴蝶扫描的特殊轨迹仍能减少伪影、改善对比度并增强皮质髓质交界区分辨率。然而,降低剂量的影响更为明显,尤其是在枕叶区域,该区域易受骨干扰影响,导致对比度降低和皮质髓质交界区分辨率受损。