Palmeri Nicholas O, Alyesh Daniel, Keith Madison, Greenhaw Erin, Erickson Cooper, Choe William, Sundaram Sri
Cardiac Electrophysiology, South Denver Cardiology Associates, 1000 Southpark Drive, Littleton, CO, 80111, USA.
EP, Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;68(4):757-765. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01904-w. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and fluoroless ablation (FA) are emerging techniques in contemporary in electrophysiology. With widespread use of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems and advanced intracardiac echo (ICE) imaging, fluoroless ablation has become more widely adopted. However, with the importance of tissue contact for lesion durability, initial PFA has been used with fluoroscopic guidance, but both ICE and electroanatomic mapping make fluoroless PFA feasible. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that PFA can be done safely and effectively without fluoroscopy.
At a single center, consecutive patients undergoing ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter using a fluoroless approach are described. The standard 3D anatomic map settings were adjusted with changes in interior and exterior projection, respiratory compensation, and interpolation. In addition, projection map lesions were used to confirm adequate circumferential ablation lesions. ICE was used extensively for wire guidance and evaluation of contact with tissue.
Beginning on March 15, 2024, 50 consecutive subjects (19 female/31 male) aged 68.0 (± 13.7) underwent PFA ablation. The average CHADS-VASc score was 3.0 (± 1.9). The average LVEF was 57.3% (± 10.0) and the average LA size was 3.9 cm (± 1.2). Projection lesions were placed with every application of PFA. An average of 41.7 (± 8.5) PFA applications were placed. In 100% (50/50) of subjects, acute isolation of the pulmonary veins was achieved. Eighteen subjects also underwent concomitant posterior wall isolation and in 100% of these subjects, posterior isolation was achieved. There were zero complications in this cohort. In 50/50 subjects (100%), fluoroscopy was not used. In comparison to the control cohort, the LA dwell time of the ablation catheter was similar (p = 0.34).
In comparison to the traditional PFA with fluoroscopy, this proof-of-concept study shows fluoroless PFA ablation can be performed safely and with similar acute success rates as with use of fluoroscopy.
脉冲场消融(PFA)和无荧光消融(FA)是当代电生理学中新兴的技术。随着三维电解剖标测系统和先进的心腔内超声(ICE)成像的广泛应用,无荧光消融已得到更广泛的采用。然而,由于组织接触对损伤持久性的重要性,最初的PFA是在透视引导下使用的,但ICE和电解剖标测都使无荧光PFA成为可能。本研究的目的是证明PFA可以在无透视的情况下安全有效地进行。
在一个中心,描述了连续使用无荧光方法通过五边形PFA导管进行消融的患者。根据内部和外部投影、呼吸补偿和插值的变化调整标准三维解剖图设置。此外,使用投影图损伤来确认充分的环周消融损伤。ICE被广泛用于导线引导和组织接触评估。
从2024年3月15日开始,50名连续受试者(19名女性/31名男性),年龄68.0(±13.7)岁,接受了PFA消融。平均CHADS-VASc评分为3.0(±1.9)。平均左心室射血分数(LVEF)为57.3%(±10.0),平均左心房大小为3.9 cm(±1.2)。每次应用PFA时都放置投影损伤。平均放置了41.7(±8.5)次PFA应用。100%(50/50)的受试者实现了肺静脉的急性隔离。18名受试者还同时进行了后壁隔离,其中100%的受试者实现了后壁隔离。该队列中无并发症发生。50/50名受试者(100%)未使用透视。与对照组相比,消融导管在左心房的停留时间相似(p = 0.34)。
与传统的透视引导下的PFA相比,这项概念验证研究表明无荧光PFA消融可以安全进行,且急性成功率与使用透视时相似。