Suppr超能文献

水凝胶涂层主动引流型胸腔引流管在心脏手术中的应用:单中心研究的真实世界结果。

Hydrogel-coated and active clearance chest drains in cardiac surgery: real-world results of a single-center study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Aug 23;19(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02987-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cardiac surgery patients require chest drains for postoperative fluid drainage. Innovations in this field include chemical drain coating and manual clot extraction systems, aiming to provide reduced clotting and improved patient comfort. This study compares outcomes using hydrogel-coated, active clearance and conventional chest drains.

METHODS

Patients with cardiac surgery at our institution from January 2023 to September 2023 were included. Drain allocation was based on surgeon's choice, with either a combination of hydrogel-coated and conventional, active clearance and conventional, or conventional drains alone. Drain data and clinical outcomes were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-eight patients (62.9 ± 11.7 years, 67.4% male) received a total of 512 chest drains intraoperatively. Hydrogel-coated and active clearance drains showed higher drainage volumes than conventional drains (p < 0.001, respectively). Patency was lowest in conventional drains (36.7% vs. 98.8% for hydrogel-coated, p < 0.001, and vs. 96.6% for active clearance drains, p < 0.001). Conventional drains showed 5.9 times the odds (95% CI 2.0-25.2) of large pleural effusions compared to hydrogel-coated and 12.0 times the odds (95% CI 1.9-504.1) compared to active clearance drains. Patients with hydrogel-coated drains had the shortest length of stay (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Hydrogel-coated and active clearance drains show improved outcomes compared to conventional drains in cardiac surgery.

摘要

目的

心脏手术患者需要胸腔引流管来排出术后液体。该领域的创新包括化学引流涂层和手动血块提取系统,旨在减少凝血并提高患者舒适度。本研究比较了使用水凝胶涂层、主动引流和传统胸腔引流管的结果。

方法

纳入我院 2023 年 1 月至 9 月期间接受心脏手术的患者。引流管的分配基于外科医生的选择,包括水凝胶涂层和传统、主动引流和传统、或单独使用传统引流管的组合。前瞻性记录引流管数据和临床结果。

结果

178 名患者(62.9±11.7 岁,67.4%为男性)共接受了 512 个胸腔引流管的手术内置入。水凝胶涂层和主动引流管的引流量均高于传统引流管(p<0.001)。传统引流管的通畅性最低(36.7% vs. 水凝胶涂层为 98.8%,p<0.001,和主动引流管为 96.6%,p<0.001)。与水凝胶涂层相比,传统引流管发生大量胸腔积液的可能性是其 5.9 倍(95%CI 2.0-25.2),与主动引流管相比则为 12.0 倍(95%CI 1.9-504.1)。使用水凝胶涂层引流管的患者住院时间最短(p<0.001)。

结论

与传统引流管相比,水凝胶涂层和主动引流管在心脏手术中具有更好的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96b8/11342505/968031308d39/13019_2024_2987_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

4
High-vacuum drains rival conventional underwater-seal drains after pediatric heart surgery.小儿心脏手术后,高真空引流管与传统的水封引流管效果相当。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Mar;27(3):395-9; discussion 399-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.023. Epub 2004 Dec 25.
7
Mediastinal chest drain clearance for cardiac surgery.心脏手术的纵隔胸腔引流管拔除
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2002(4):CD003042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003042.pub2.
10
Mediastinal chest drain clearance for cardiac surgery.心脏手术的纵隔胸腔引流管拔除
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD003042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003042.

本文引用的文献

3
Does Active Chest Tube Clearance After Cardiac Surgery Provide Any Clear Benefits?心脏手术后主动胸腔引流管清除是否有明确获益?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Oct;114(4):1334-1340. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.086. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
10
Pleural effusion: diagnosis, treatment, and management.胸腔积液:诊断、治疗与管理
Open Access Emerg Med. 2012 Jun 22;4:31-52. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S29942. eCollection 2012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验