Mäkikomsi Milla, Terkamo-Moisio Anja, Kaunonen Marja, Aho Anna L
Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Omega (Westport). 2024 Aug 24:302228241277853. doi: 10.1177/00302228241277853.
Continuing bond manifesting as unexplainable experiences reflects bereaved´s attempts to restore connection with the deceased. As an experience unaligned with a person's overall schemas of meaning unexplainable experiences are a source of anxiety that individuals aim to alleviate by attribution thinking. This study describes how bereaved aim to explain unexplainable experiences related to the death of their loved ones. The study analysed 408 narratives of 181 bereaved individuals. Bereaved individuals (1) described the meaning of their experience to be receaving information, emotions or support by the experience and communicating about crossing the boundary between life and death. As (2) reflections on the cause of their experiences bereaved individuals described certain and uncertain explanations of the phenomenon, ruling out explanations and the compatibility or incompatibility of the experience with their prior worldviews. The process of attribution thinking must be perceived as meaningful regardless of the outcome of the bereaved person's reflection.
持续存在的联结表现为无法解释的经历,这反映了丧亲者试图恢复与逝者的联系。作为一种与个人整体意义模式不一致的经历,无法解释的经历是焦虑的来源,个体试图通过归因思维来缓解这种焦虑。本研究描述了丧亲者如何试图解释与他们所爱之人死亡相关的无法解释的经历。该研究分析了181名丧亲者的408篇叙述。丧亲者(1)将他们经历的意义描述为通过该经历接收信息、情感或支持,以及交流跨越生死界限的情况。作为(2)对其经历原因的思考,丧亲者描述了对该现象的确定和不确定的解释,排除了一些解释,以及该经历与他们先前世界观的相容性或不相容性。无论丧亲者思考的结果如何,归因思维的过程都必须被视为有意义的。