Department of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Nov;153:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Surfaces in close proximity to patients within hospitals may cause healthcare-associated infections. These surfaces are repositories for pathogens facilitating their transmission among staff and patients. Regular cleaning and disinfection of these surfaces provides only a temporary elimination of pathogens with inevitable recontamination. Antimicrobial coatings (AMCs) of such surfaces may additionally reduce the risk of pathogen transmissions.
To evaluate the efficacy of a standard and a novel photodynamic AMC, even at very low light intensities, in a field study conducted in two ICUs at our university hospital.
The microbial burden was determined on three coatings: standard photodynamic AMC (A), a novel photodynamic AMC (B), and an inactive AMC as control (C). The control coating C was identical to standard coating A, but it contained no photosensitizer. During a three-month period, 699 samples were collected from identical surfaces using eSwab and were analysed (cfu/cm).
Mean values of all surfaces covered with control coating (C) showed a microbial burden of 5.5 ± 14.8 cfu/cm. Photodynamic AMC showed significantly lower mean value of 1.6 ± 4.6 cfu/cm (coating A; P < 0.001) and 2.7 ± 9.6 (coating B; P < 0.001). When considering a benchmark of 2.5 cfu/cm, the relative risk for higher microbial counts was reduced by 52% (coating A) or 40% (coating B), respectively.
Both photodynamic AMCs offer a substantial, permanent risk reduction of microbial counts on near-patient surfaces in ICUs with low light intensities.
医院内靠近患者的表面可能会导致医源性感染。这些表面是病原体的储存库,促进了它们在员工和患者之间的传播。这些表面的定期清洁和消毒只能暂时消除病原体,无法避免再次污染。这些表面的抗菌涂层(AMC)可能会进一步降低病原体传播的风险。
评估标准和新型光动力 AMC 在我们大学医院的两个 ICU 中进行的现场研究中的疗效,即使在非常低的光强度下也是如此。
在三种涂层上测定微生物负担:标准光动力 AMC(A)、新型光动力 AMC(B)和作为对照的非活性 AMC(C)。对照涂层 C 与标准涂层 A 完全相同,但不含光敏剂。在三个月的时间里,从相同的表面用 eSwab 收集了 699 个样本并进行了分析(cfu/cm)。
所有覆盖对照涂层(C)的表面的平均值显示微生物负担为 5.5 ± 14.8 cfu/cm。光动力 AMC 的平均值明显较低,为 1.6 ± 4.6 cfu/cm(涂层 A;P < 0.001)和 2.7 ± 9.6 cfu/cm(涂层 B;P < 0.001)。当考虑 2.5 cfu/cm 的基准时,微生物计数较高的相对风险分别降低了 52%(涂层 A)或 40%(涂层 B)。
两种光动力 AMC 都能显著降低 ICU 中靠近患者表面的微生物计数,即使在低光照强度下也能提供持久的风险降低。