Efficacy and safety of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy across different etiologies of gastroparesis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is an emerging treatment for refractory gastroparesis. Although its efficacy and safety have been analyzed in previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, no studies have compared its effectiveness based on etiology. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of G-POEM by etiologies of gastroparesis.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in major databases until October 2023, focusing on the efficacy and safety of G-POEM by etiology. Our primary outcome was clinical success based on etiology, with an additional subgroup analysis on Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) scores before and after G-POEM based on etiology using standard meta-analysis methods and the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I statistics.

RESULTS

In our analysis of 15 studies (7 retrospective, 8 prospective) involving 982 patients (mean patient age, 50.81 years; mean follow-up, 21 months), postsurgical conditions were the most common etiology in G-POEM (290 cases), followed by idiopathic factors (287 cases) and diabetes (286 cases). Subgroup analysis revealed pooled clinical success rates of 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51-77; I = 46%) for diabetes, 70% (95% CI, 46-86; I = 73%) for postsurgical conditions, and 60% (95% CI, 41-77; I = 68%) for idiopathic etiologies. Our research also indicated that G-POEM significantly improved GCSI scores: 1.7 (95% CI, -.01 to 3.5; P = .052) for diabetes, 1.34 (95% CI, -.07 to 2.62; P = .038) for postsurgical conditions, and 1.5 (95% CI, .36-2.75; P = .01) for idiopathic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, G-POEM is effective and safe for treating refractory gastroparesis irrespective of the etiology, with significant improvements in clinical success rates and GCSI scores.