Department of Pediatrics, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan; Department of Cancer Immunotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Nov;30(11):1102.e1-1102.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
The AML-05 study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic strategy based on risk stratification for low-, intermediate-, or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pediatric patients. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was not indicated for low- or intermediate-risk AML patients in first complete remission. The present retrospective study for the AML-05 study aimed to identify prognostic factors for survival and to determine optimal allo-HCT according to multivariate analysis on overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality for and between low- and intermediate-risk AML group patients in the AML-05 study who had undergone allo-HCT after its completion and relapse. The unique patient numbers (UPNs) of the AML-05 study were matched with the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP)-registered numbers, and the tied data on the AML-05 study's UPNs and the TRUMP-registered numbers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was 3-yr OS. Among 443 AML patients in the AML-05 study, 79 (32 low-risk AML and 47 intermediate-risk AML) were analyzed. The following statistically favorable prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis on the low- and intermediate-risk AML groups, respectively: UCB (OS-hazard ratio [HR], 0.105; 95% CI, 0.011 to 0.941; P = .004 and EFS-HR, 0.065, 95% CI, 0.007 to 0.577, P = .014) and late relapse (OS-HR, 0.212; 95% CI, 0.072 to 0.626; P = .005 and EFS-HR, 0.236; 95% CI, 0.088 to 0.630; P = .004). Three-year OS, 3-yr EFS, and 3-yr CIR were significantly different between the low- and intermediate-risk AML groups. UCB may be a safe and beneficial donor source for low-risk AML patients, while late relapse was a favorable prognostic factor for intermediate-risk AML patients. Intermediate-risk AML patients with late relapse and low-risk AML patients may benefit from allo-HCT after relapse.
AML-05 研究旨在检验基于风险分层的低、中、高危急性髓细胞白血病(AML)儿科患者治疗策略的疗效和安全性。对于首次完全缓解的低危或中危 AML 患者,不建议进行同种异体造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)。本研究回顾性分析了 AML-05 研究中的低危和中危 AML 患者,旨在确定生存的预后因素,并根据多变量分析确定最佳 allo-HCT,多变量分析包括总生存(OS)、无事件生存(EFS)、累积复发率(CIR)和低危和中危 AML 组患者的非复发死亡率的累积发生率,这些患者在 AML-05 研究完成后复发并进行了 allo-HCT。AML-05 研究的唯一患者编号(UPN)与移植登记统一管理计划(TRUMP)登记编号相匹配,并对 AML-05 研究的 UPN 和 TRUMP 登记编号的相关数据进行了分析。主要终点是 3 年 OS。在 AML-05 研究的 443 名 AML 患者中,有 79 名(32 名低危 AML 和 47 名中危 AML)进行了分析。多变量分析分别确定了低危和中危 AML 组具有统计学意义的有利预后因素:UCB(OS-HR,0.105;95%CI,0.011 至 0.941;P =.004 和 EFS-HR,0.065,95%CI,0.007 至 0.577,P =.014)和晚期复发(OS-HR,0.212;95%CI,0.072 至 0.626;P =.005 和 EFS-HR,0.236;95%CI,0.088 至 0.630;P =.004)。低危和中危 AML 组之间的 3 年 OS、3 年 EFS 和 3 年 CIR 差异具有统计学意义。UCB 可能是低危 AML 患者安全且有益的供者来源,而晚期复发是中危 AML 患者的有利预后因素。晚期复发的中危 AML 患者和低危 AML 患者在复发后可能受益于 allo-HCT。