Suppr超能文献

老年急性基底动脉闭塞性卒中的血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗对比

Endovascular Thrombectomy versus Medical Management for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke in the Elderly.

作者信息

Chen Huanwen, Colasurdo Marco, Khunte Mihir, Malhotra Ajay, Gandhi Dheeraj

机构信息

From the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (H.C.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Department of Neurology (H.C.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Feb 3;46(2):278-284. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8473.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for elderly patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke is unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of EVT for elderly BAO stroke patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an explorative retrospective analysis of the 2016-21 National Inpatient Sample in the United States. Elderly patients with BAO stroke (80 years of age or older) with an NIHSS score of at least 5 were included. Primary outcome was discharge home. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Outcomes were compared between patients treated with EVT and those treated with medical management (MM) alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control confounders. Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients who did and did not receive IV thrombolysis (IVT).

RESULTS

We identified 2520 elderly patients with BAO stroke; 830 received EVT and 1690 received MM alone. After PSM, 1115 patients and 715 patients remained in the MM and EVT groups, respectively. Compared with PSM controls, EVT was not significantly associated with different rates of home discharge (17.5% versus 12.2%; OR, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.76-2.44], = .30) or in-hospital mortality (31.5% versus 32.9%; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.63-1.60], = .99), but it was significantly associated with higher rates of ICH (18.2% versus 7.3%; OR, 2.69 [95% CI, 1.41-5.15], = .003). Among patients who did not receive IVT, EVT was significantly associated with higher rates of home discharge (21.5% versus 11.5%; OR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.02-3.66], = .044), whereas EVT was not significantly associated with a different rate of home discharge among those treated with IVT (5.6% versus 15.0%; OR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.05-1.46], = .13). Interaction analysis revealed that IVT was a negative modulator of the positive association of EVTs with home discharge (interaction = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

EVT was not significantly associated with more favorable hospitalization outcomes for elderly patients with BAO stroke, and it was significantly associated with an increased risk of ICH. EVT may be an effective treatment for patients who did not receive IVT.

摘要

背景与目的

血管内血栓切除术(EVT)治疗老年基底动脉闭塞(BAO)性卒中的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨EVT治疗老年BAO性卒中患者的安全性和疗效。

材料与方法

这是一项对2016 - 2021年美国国家住院患者样本的探索性回顾性分析。纳入年龄在80岁及以上、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分至少为5分的老年BAO性卒中患者。主要结局是出院回家。次要结局包括住院死亡率和颅内出血(ICH)。比较接受EVT治疗的患者和仅接受药物治疗(MM)的患者的结局。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以控制混杂因素。对接受和未接受静脉溶栓(IVT)的患者进行亚组分析。

结果

我们确定了2520例老年BAO性卒中患者;830例接受了EVT,1690例仅接受了MM。PSM后,MM组和EVT组分别有1115例和715例患者。与PSM对照组相比,EVT与出院回家率的差异无统计学意义(17.5%对12.2%;OR,1.36[95%CI,0.76 -

2.44],P = 0.30)或住院死亡率的差异无统计学意义(31.5%对32.9%;OR,1.00[95%CI,0.63 - 1.60],P = 0.99),但与较高的ICH发生率显著相关(18.2%对7.3%;OR,2.69[95%CI,1.41 - 5.15],P = 0.003)。在未接受IVT的患者中,EVT与较高的出院回家率显著相关(21.5%对11.5%;OR,1.93[95%CI,1.02 - 3.66],P = 0.044),而在接受IVT的患者中,EVT与出院回家率的差异无统计学意义(5.6%对15.0%;OR,0.28[95%CI,0.05 - 1.46],P = 0.13)。交互分析显示,IVT是EVT与出院回家正相关的负调节因子(交互P = 0.031)。

结论

EVT与老年BAO性卒中患者更有利的住院结局无显著相关性,且与ICH风险增加显著相关。EVT可能是未接受IVT患者的有效治疗方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验