Suppr超能文献

BAND 评分:一种简单的模型,可在成功进行卒中取栓后预测不良结局。

The BAND score: A simple model for upfront prediction of poor outcomes despite successful stroke thrombectomy.

机构信息

Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore MD 21201, USA; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD 20814, USA; Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC 20007, USA.

Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 May;33(5):107608. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107608. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is beneficial for patients with acute large vessel occlusion ischemic strokes, a significant portion of patients still do poorly despite successful recanalization. Identifying patients at high risk for poor outcomes can be helpful for future clinical trial design and optimizing acute stroke triage.

METHODS

Consecutive EVT patients were identified from 2016 to 2021 at a Comprehensive Stroke Center, and clinical information was recorded. Poor outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 4 or greater despite achieving a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for poor outcomes, and a scoring system was constructed.

RESULTS

483 patients with successful recanalization were identified. From a randomly selected training cohort (n = 357), the 10-point BAND score was constructed from independent risk factors for poor outcomes: baseline disability (1 point: baseline mRS ≥ 2), age (1 point: 60-69 years, 2 points: 70-79 years, 3 points: 80-84 years, 4 points: 85 years or older), NIHSS (2 points: 13-17, 3 points: 18-22, and 4 points: ≥ 23), and delay from last known normal (1 point: ≥ 6 h). The BAND score was significantly associated with rates of poor outcomes (p < 0.001), and it achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95 %CI 0.76-0.85) in our training cohort and 0.78 (95 %CI 0.70-0.86) in our validation cohort (n = 126). Overall, the BAND score had a significantly higher AUC value than the widely validated THRIVE score and the THRIVE-EVT calculation (p = 0.001 and 0.029, respectively). Among patients with high BAND scores (7 or higher), 88.2 % had poor outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The BAND score is a simple tool to predict poor outcomes despite successful recanalization. Future studies are needed to confirm the BAND score's external validity.

摘要

背景

尽管血管内血栓切除术(EVT)对急性大血管闭塞性缺血性中风患者有益,但仍有很大一部分患者尽管血管再通仍预后不良。识别有发生不良预后风险的患者有助于未来临床试验的设计和优化急性卒中分诊。

方法

从 2016 年至 2021 年,在一家综合性卒中中心连续识别 EVT 患者,并记录临床信息。预后不良定义为虽达到改良脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)分级 2b 级以上,但 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分仍为 4 或更高。采用多变量回归分析识别预后不良的危险因素,并构建评分系统。

结果

确定了 483 例血管再通成功的患者。在一个随机选择的训练队列(n=357)中,10 分 BAND 评分由预后不良的独立危险因素构建:基线残疾(1 分:基线 mRS≥2)、年龄(1 分:60-69 岁,2 分:70-79 岁,3 分:80-84 岁,4 分:85 岁或以上)、NIHSS(2 分:13-17,3 分:18-22,4 分:≥23)和从最后正常时间的延迟(1 分:≥6 小时)。BAND 评分与不良结局发生率显著相关(p<0.001),在训练队列中获得了受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)为 0.80(95%CI 0.76-0.85),在验证队列中(n=126)为 0.78(95%CI 0.70-0.86)。总体而言,BAND 评分的 AUC 值显著高于广泛验证的 THRIVE 评分和 THRIVE-EVT 计算(p=0.001 和 0.029)。在 BAND 评分较高(7 分或以上)的患者中,88.2%的患者预后不良。

结论

BAND 评分是一种预测血管再通后不良预后的简单工具。需要进一步研究来证实 BAND 评分的外部有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验