Fogel Guy, Dickinson Jake, Vuong Sunny
Christus Santa Rosa Spine Clinic, San Antonio, TX, USA
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Aug 24;18(6):694-704. doi: 10.14444/8632.
Ablation of the basivertebral nerve (BVNA) innervating the vertebral endplate has become a standard treatment of vertebrogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP) arising from vertebral endplate damage. BVNA treatment of CLBP in clinical trials was successful and durable for pain relief and return to daily activities. This case review adds new information about older patients with adult degenerative spinal deformity (ASD) and associated comorbidities not previously described in clinical trials.
One hundred and eighteen ASD patients with vertebrogenic CLBP in a community practice setting underwent 503 levels of BVNA (average 4.3 levels). Forty-one patients with minimal comorbidities (Group A) were compared to 77 patients with significant comorbidities (Group B). Visual analog scale (VAS 10 cm) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI 100-point scale) were obtained before BVNA and at a last follow-up (LFU).
Group A VAS at LFU was an average of 2 cm, a 7 cm improvement. Group B VAS at LFU was 3 cm, a 6 cm improvement. At LFU, Group A ODI mean was 14 points or minimal disability, with a 39-point improvement, and Group B improved 28 points to 29 but remained moderately disabled. At LFU, the lumbar stenosis with laminectomy and BVNA subgroup of 26 had mean VAS 2 cm and ODI 28-point improvement but remained on average 21 points with a final low moderate disability. Eleven laminectomy and BVNA patients had continued posterior column pain related to radiculopathy, and or peripheral neuropathy, and sacroiliac joint pain in 30%. Mobile spondylolisthesis in 21 patients in Group B at LFU had a 6 cm improvement of VAS and 25-point improvement of ODI but remained moderately disabled on ODI. At LFU in group B, there was a 20% incidence of continued stenosis and radiculopathy symptoms. At LFU, Lumbar fusion was recommended in 9. Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) occurred in 9 after BVNA (10%) of Group B. These patients were older (mean 78 years), and all had significant osteoporosis. Eight fractures were within the area of the BVNA, and 1 was an S2 sacral fracture. These VCF patients were treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty and continued preventive care with added teriparatide. At LFU, the VCF subgroup had a modest 6 cm improvement in VAS to 4 cm and continued to have significant severe to moderate disability (Oswestry Disability Index average of 38 points).
Clinical trials of BVNA treatment of CLBP found success and durability for pain relief and daily activities. Patients with ASD without comorbidities showed durable pain relief of vertebrogenic CLBP and return of daily activities similar to clinical trials. In those with comorbidities, the result was an improvement in pain and disability that could be diminished by the complications related to the comorbidities. This is new information about BVNA for older patients with spinal deformity and other comorbidities. This study could impact research practice and policy to expand indications of BVNA to patients with adult spinal deformity.
This case series represents the only literature regarding patients with adult spinal deformity treated with BVNA. The results were predictable and reproducible. Many patients were satisfied, would have the procedure again and would recommend BVNA to friends and family. This finding should encourage acceptance of patients with ASD for BVNA and, in fact, BVNA should probably be done before any fusion to limit and choose levels for inclusion in fusion.
消融支配椎体终板的椎基神经(BVNA)已成为治疗因椎体终板损伤引起的脊椎源性慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的标准方法。BVNA治疗CLBP的临床试验在缓解疼痛和恢复日常活动方面取得了成功且效果持久。本病例回顾为老年成人退变性脊柱畸形(ASD)患者及相关合并症提供了新信息,这些信息在之前的临床试验中未曾描述。
在社区实践环境中,118例患有脊椎源性CLBP的ASD患者接受了503个节段的BVNA治疗(平均4.3个节段)。将41例合并症轻微的患者(A组)与77例合并症严重的患者(B组)进行比较。在BVNA治疗前及最后一次随访(LFU)时获取视觉模拟量表(VAS,10厘米)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI,100分制)。
A组LFU时的VAS平均为2厘米,改善了7厘米。B组LFU时的VAS为3厘米,改善了6厘米。在LFU时,A组ODI平均值为14分或功能障碍轻微,改善了39分,B组改善了28分至29分,但仍有中度功能障碍。在LFU时,26例接受椎板切除术和BVNA治疗的腰椎管狭窄亚组患者的VAS平均为2厘米,ODI改善了28分,但最终仍平均有21分,功能障碍为轻度至中度。11例接受椎板切除术和BVNA治疗的患者持续存在与神经根病和/或周围神经病变相关的后柱疼痛,30%的患者有骶髂关节疼痛。B组21例患者在LFU时的活动型腰椎滑脱VAS改善了6厘米,ODI改善了25分,但ODI仍为中度功能障碍。在B组LFU时,持续存在狭窄和神经根病症状的发生率为20%。在LFU时,9例患者建议进行腰椎融合术。B组9例患者(10%)在BVNA治疗后发生椎体压缩骨折(VCF)。这些患者年龄较大(平均78岁),均有严重骨质疏松。8例骨折发生在BVNA治疗区域内,1例为S2骶骨骨折。这些VCF患者接受了椎体成形术或后凸成形术治疗,并继续接受添加特立帕肽的预防性治疗。在LFU时,VCF亚组的VAS适度改善了6厘米至4厘米,仍有严重至中度功能障碍(Oswestry功能障碍指数平均为38分)。
BVNA治疗CLBP的临床试验在缓解疼痛和日常活动方面取得了成功且效果持久。无合并症的ASD患者在脊椎源性CLBP的疼痛缓解和日常活动恢复方面显示出与临床试验相似的持久效果。对于有合并症的患者,结果是疼痛和功能障碍有所改善,但可能会因合并症相关的并发症而减弱。这是关于BVNA治疗老年脊柱畸形及其他合并症患者的新信息。本研究可能会影响研究实践和政策,将BVNA的适应证扩大到成人脊柱畸形患者。
本病例系列是关于接受BVNA治疗的成人脊柱畸形患者的唯一文献。结果具有可预测性和可重复性。许多患者感到满意,愿意再次接受该手术,并会向朋友和家人推荐BVNA。这一发现应鼓励接受ASD患者进行BVNA治疗,事实上,可能应在任何融合手术之前进行BVNA,以限制并选择纳入融合的节段。