Smuck Matthew, McCormick Zachary L, Gilligan Chris, Hailey Mary K, Quinn Michelle L, Bentley Anthony, Metcalfe Kaylie, Bradbury Benjamin, Lukes Dylan J, Taylor Rod S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Spine J. 2025 Feb;25(2):201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
Randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA) compared with sham and standard care in terms of improvements in pain, disability, and health-related quality of life in patients with vertebrogenic chronic low back pain (cLBP).
To assess the cost effectiveness of BVNA in patients with vertebrogenic cLBP compared to standard care alone.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A model-based economic analysis.
Base case analysis used INTRACEPT, a randomized trial comparing BVNA with standard care in 140 patients with vertebrogenic cLBP, recruited from 23 sites across the United States, with a follow-up, up to 5 years. Scenario analyses compared data from the Surgical Multicenter Assessment of Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Vertebrogenic Back Pain (SMART) randomized trial against a sham control, and a single-arm study.
Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
A cost-effectiveness model was built in Microsoft Excel to evaluate the costs and health outcomes of patients undergoing BVNA using the Intracept Procedure (Relievant Medsystems) to treat vertebrogenic cLBP from a US payor perspective. Alternative scenario sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model results. QALYs were discounted at 3.0% per year.
Base case analysis showed that BVNA relative to standard care alone was a cost-effective strategy for the management of patients with vertebrogenic cLBP, with an ICER of US$11,376 per QALY at a 5-year time horizon from introduction of the procedure. Modeling demonstrated a >99% probability that this was cost effective in the US, based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 to US$150,000. Various sensitivity and scenario analyses produced ICERs that all remained below this threshold.
BVNA with the Intracept Procedure offers patients with vertebrogenic cLBP, clinicians, and healthcare systems a cost-effective treatment compared to standard care alone.
随机试验已证明,在改善椎源性慢性下腰痛(cLBP)患者的疼痛、功能障碍及健康相关生活质量方面,骨内椎基底神经消融术(BVNA)优于假手术和标准治疗。
评估与单纯标准治疗相比,BVNA治疗椎源性cLBP患者的成本效益。
研究设计/地点:基于模型的经济分析。
基础病例分析使用INTRACEPT,这是一项将BVNA与标准治疗进行比较的随机试验,纳入了140例来自美国23个地点的椎源性cLBP患者,随访时间长达5年。情景分析将射频消融治疗椎源性背痛的外科多中心评估(SMART)随机试验的数据与假手术对照组及一项单臂研究的数据进行了比较。
计算成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)以确定增量成本效益比(ICER)。
在Microsoft Excel中建立成本效益模型,从美国支付方的角度评估接受使用Intracept手术(Relievant Medsystems)进行BVNA治疗椎源性cLBP患者的成本和健康结局。进行了替代情景敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析,以评估模型结果的稳健性。QALY按每年3.0%进行贴现。
基础病例分析表明,相对于单纯标准治疗,BVNA是治疗椎源性cLBP患者的一种具有成本效益的策略,从引入该手术起5年的时间范围内,ICER为每QALY 11,376美元。根据100,000美元至150,000美元的支付意愿阈值,模型显示在美国该治疗具有成本效益的概率>99%。各种敏感性和情景分析得出的ICER均保持在该阈值以下。
与单纯标准治疗相比,使用Intracept手术进行BVNA为椎源性cLBP患者、临床医生和医疗保健系统提供了一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。