• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

WONDER-02:内镜超声引导下引流胰腺假性囊肿的塑料支架与 lumen-apposing 金属支架的比较——一项多中心随机非劣效性试验研究方案。

WONDER-02: plastic stent vs. lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts-study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Aug 24;25(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08373-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08373-6
PMID:39182137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11344301/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has become a first-line treatment modality for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Despite the increasing popularity of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), plastic stents may resolve non-necrotic fluid collections effectively with lower costs and no LAMS-specific adverse events. To date, there has been a paucity of data on the appropriate stent type in this setting. This trial aims to assess the non-inferiority of plastic stents to a LAMS for the initial EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts.

METHODS

The WONDER-02 trial is a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, which will enrol pancreatic pseudocyst patients requiring EUS-guided treatment in 26 centres in Japan. This trial plans to enrol 80 patients who will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either plastic stents or a LAMS (40 patients per arm). In the plastic stent group, EUS-guided drainage will be performed using two 7-Fr double pigtail stents. In the LAMS group, the treatment will be performed in the same way except for LAMS use. The step-up treatment will be performed via endoscopic and/or percutaneous procedures at the trial investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint is clinical success, which is defined as a decrease in a pseudocyst size to ≤ 2 cm and an improvement in inflammatory indicators (i.e. body temperature, white blood cell count, and serum C-reactive protein). Secondary endpoints include technical success, adverse events including mortality, pseudocyst recurrence, and medical costs.

DISCUSSION

The WONDER-02 trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of plastic stents compared to a LAMS in EUS-guided treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts with a particular focus on the non-inferior efficacy of plastic stents. The findings will help establish a new treatment algorithm for this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06133023 registered on 9 November 2023. UMIN000052647 registered on 30 October 2023. jRCT1032230444 registered on 7 November 2023.

摘要

背景

内镜超声 (EUS)-引导下经腔引流已成为治疗有症状胰腺假性囊肿的一线治疗方法。尽管 lumen-apposing 金属支架 (LAMS) 的应用越来越普及,但塑料支架可能以更低的成本有效地解决非坏死性积液积聚,且无 LAMS 相关不良事件。迄今为止,在这种情况下,关于适当支架类型的数据很少。本试验旨在评估在初始 EUS 引导下引流假性囊肿时,塑料支架与 LAMS 的非劣效性。

方法

WONDER-02 试验是一项多中心、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照试验,将在日本的 26 个中心招募需要 EUS 治疗的胰腺假性囊肿患者。该试验计划招募 80 名患者,他们将以 1:1 的比例随机分为塑料支架组或 LAMS 组(每组 40 名患者)。在塑料支架组中,将使用两根 7Fr 双猪尾支架进行 EUS 引导下引流。在 LAMS 组中,将以相同的方式进行治疗,只是使用 LAMS。根据试验研究者的判断,将通过内镜和/或经皮程序进行升级治疗。主要终点是临床成功率,定义为假性囊肿大小降至≤2cm 和炎症指标(即体温、白细胞计数和血清 C 反应蛋白)改善。次要终点包括技术成功率、包括死亡率、假性囊肿复发和医疗费用在内的不良事件。

讨论

WONDER-02 试验将研究与 LAMS 相比,塑料支架在 EUS 引导下治疗有症状胰腺假性囊肿的疗效和安全性,特别关注塑料支架的非劣效疗效。研究结果将有助于为这一人群建立新的治疗方案。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06133023 于 2023 年 11 月 9 日注册。UMIN000052647 于 2023 年 10 月 30 日注册。jRCT1032230444 于 2023 年 11 月 7 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddcf/11344301/1b0243380355/13063_2024_8373_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddcf/11344301/1b0243380355/13063_2024_8373_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddcf/11344301/1b0243380355/13063_2024_8373_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
WONDER-02: plastic stent vs. lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts-study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.WONDER-02:内镜超声引导下引流胰腺假性囊肿的塑料支架与 lumen-apposing 金属支架的比较——一项多中心随机非劣效性试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Aug 24;25(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08373-6.
2
Head-to-head comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided lumen apposing metal stent and plastic stents for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜超声引导下置管引流与塑料支架治疗胰腺液体积聚的头对头比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Feb;29(2):198-211. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1008. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) versus plastic stents for EUS-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) (LVPWON): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.用于内镜超声引导下壁内坏死(WON)引流(LVPWON)的管腔对接金属支架(LAMS)与塑料支架的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 11;19(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2901-3.
4
WONDER-01: immediate necrosectomy vs. drainage-oriented step-up approach after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis-study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.WONDER-01 研究方案:内镜超声引导下置管引流治疗包裹性坏死后立即行坏死组织清除术与逐步引流策略的比较——一项多中心随机对照临床试验
Trials. 2023 May 24;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07377-y.
5
EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections and necrosis by using a novel lumen-apposing stent: a large retrospective, multicenter U.S. experience (with videos).EUS 引导下使用新型通道吻合支架对胰周液体积聚和坏死进行引流:一项大型回顾性、多中心美国经验(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Apr;83(4):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
A novel lumen-apposing metal stent with an anti-reflux valve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis: A pilot study.一种新型带有防反流阀的内镜超声引导下引流假性囊肿和隔离性坏死的腔内置入金属支架:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0221812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221812. eCollection 2019.
7
Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm Bleeding With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Compared to Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents in Patients With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections.与双猪尾塑料支架相比, lumen- 吻合金属支架在胰周积液患者中假性动脉瘤出血的发生率增加。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;16(9):1521-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Safety of lumen-apposing stent with or without coaxial plastic stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective study.内镜超声引导下引流胰腺液体积聚时使用或不使用同轴塑料支架的 lumen-apposing 支架的安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Endoscopy. 2018 Oct;50(10):1022-1026. doi: 10.1055/a-0582-9127. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Lumen-apposing-metal stent misdeployment in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainages: A systematic review focusing on issues and rescue management.内镜超声引导引流中防漏金属支架错位:重点关注问题和抢救管理的系统评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 7;29(21):3341-3361. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i21.3341.
10
Multicenter study of plastic vs. self-expanding metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - PROMETHEUS: a randomized controlled trial protocol.内镜超声引导下隔离性胰腺坏死引流中塑料支架与自膨式金属支架的多中心研究 - PROMETHEUS:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3988-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pancreatic Pseudocysts: Evolution of Treatment Approaches.胰腺假性囊肿:治疗方法的演变
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 30;14(17):6152. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176152.

本文引用的文献

1
Lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stent placement for the management of pancreatic fluid collections.带或不带同轴塑料支架置入的管腔贴合金属支架用于治疗胰腺液体积聚。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jan;99(1):104-107. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
2
Risk factors for adverse outcomes at various phases of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Data from a multi-institutional consortium.内镜超声引导下治疗胰腺液体积聚各阶段不良结局的危险因素:多机构联盟的数据。
Dig Endosc. 2024 May;36(5):600-614. doi: 10.1111/den.14683. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
WONDER-01: immediate necrosectomy vs. drainage-oriented step-up approach after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis-study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
WONDER-01 研究方案:内镜超声引导下置管引流治疗包裹性坏死后立即行坏死组织清除术与逐步引流策略的比较——一项多中心随机对照临床试验
Trials. 2023 May 24;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07377-y.
4
Time to think prime times for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: Pendulum conundrum.考虑治疗坏死性胰腺炎的黄金时间:钟摆难题。
Dig Endosc. 2023 Sep;35(6):700-710. doi: 10.1111/den.14598. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Inverse association of hospital volume with in-hospital mortality rate of patients receiving EUS-guided interventions for pancreatic fluid collections.接受超声内镜引导下胰腺液体积聚介入治疗的患者,其住院死亡率与医院容量呈反比关系。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Oct;98(4):597-606.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.2091. Epub 2023 May 5.
6
Impact of endoprosthesis type on inflammatory response in patients undergoing endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.内镜引流胰腺液体积聚患者中人工假体类型对炎症反应的影响。
Dig Endosc. 2024 Feb;36(2):195-202. doi: 10.1111/den.14565. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
Automated whole-volume measurement of CT fat fraction of the pancreas: correlation with Dixon MR imaging.胰腺 CT 脂肪分数全容积自动测量:与 Dixon MR 成像的相关性。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Jun 1;96(1146):20220937. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220937. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
8
Supportive treatment during the periprocedural period of endoscopic treatment for pancreatic fluid collections: a critical review of current knowledge and future perspectives.胰腺液体积聚内镜治疗围手术期的支持治疗:当前知识与未来展望的批判性综述
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb;58(2):98-111. doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01935-y. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
9
Early versus delayed interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.坏死性胰腺炎的早期与延迟干预:系统评价与荟萃分析
DEN Open. 2022 Oct 10;3(1):e171. doi: 10.1002/deo2.171. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Novel classification system for walled-off necrosis: a step toward standardized nomenclature and risk-stratification framework.壁性坏死的新型分类系统:迈向标准化命名和风险分层框架的一步。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Feb;97(2):300-308. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.019. Epub 2022 Oct 5.