Maisto Stephen A, Moskal Dezarie, Firkey Madison K, Bergman Brandon G, Borsari Brian, Hallgren Kevin A, Houck Jon M, Hurlocker Margo, Kiluk Brian D, Kuerbis Alexis, Reid Allecia E, Magill Molly
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
VA Center for Integrated Healthcare, VA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Sep;48(9):1677-1692. doi: 10.1111/acer.15411. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
Research designed to establish alcohol and other drug (AOD) mechanisms of behavioral change (MOBC) has centered on what variables mediate the relation between AOD treatment and outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to review this research evidence to identify empirically supported mediators of alcohol and other drug use and related outcomes and then to evaluate their potential as being AOD treatment MOBC. The first phase was a systematic review of reviews (2008-2023) to identify the variables with the strongest empirical support as mediators of AOD treatment effects. Eligible reviews focused on AOD treatment modalities, included empirically tested mediators, and targeted adult samples. The second phase was a systematic review of empirical studies (1990-2023) testing the hypothesis that variables identified in phase one were AOD treatment mediators/mechanisms and then evaluating each eligible stage two study according to the Kazdin and Nock (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1116) criteria. Eligible articles included empirical studies with adult samples attending AOD treatment and empirically tested one of the three treatment mechanisms as a mediator of an AOD-related outcome. Databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. This systematic review was not preregistered. The first review of 11 eligible review articles identified self-efficacy, social support, and craving as having the strongest empirical support. The second review captured 48 individual studies. An evaluation of each of these studies by the Kazdin and Nock criteria suggested that they likely are MOBC and therefore are ready for implementation. The implementation of self-efficacy, social support, and craving into clinical practice and training is warranted. Six directions for future research to solidify and generalize empirical support for the case that self-efficacy, social support, and craving are MOBC are presented, as are five implications for clinical practice and training.
旨在确立酒精及其他药物(AOD)行为改变机制(MOBC)的研究主要聚焦于哪些变量介导了AOD治疗与治疗结果之间的关系。本文的目的是回顾这一研究证据,以确定经实证支持的酒精及其他药物使用及相关结果的中介变量,然后评估它们作为AOD治疗MOBC的潜力。第一阶段是对综述(2008 - 2023年)进行系统回顾,以确定作为AOD治疗效果中介变量且获得最强实证支持的变量。符合条件的综述聚焦于AOD治疗方式,包括经实证检验的中介变量,并以成年样本为目标。第二阶段是对实证研究(1990 - 2023年)进行系统回顾,检验第一阶段确定的变量是AOD治疗中介变量/机制这一假设,然后根据卡兹丁和诺克(《儿童心理学与精神病学杂志》,第44卷,第1116页)的标准对每项符合条件的第二阶段研究进行评估。符合条件的文章包括针对接受AOD治疗的成年样本的实证研究,并对三种治疗机制之一作为AOD相关结果的中介变量进行了实证检验。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目对数据库进行了检索。本系统评价未预先注册。对11篇符合条件的综述文章进行的首次回顾确定自我效能感、社会支持和渴望具有最强的实证支持。第二次回顾纳入了48项个体研究。根据卡兹丁和诺克的标准对这些研究中的每一项进行评估表明,它们可能是MOBC,因此已准备好付诸实施。将自我效能感、社会支持和渴望应用于临床实践和培训是有必要的。本文提出了六个未来研究方向,以巩固和推广自我效能感、社会支持和渴望是MOBC这一观点的实证支持,还阐述了对临床实践和培训的五点启示。