Sex Differences in Predicting Difficult Laryngeal Exposure: Validation and Modification of Predictive Models.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the presence of sex differences in difficult laryngeal exposure and the Laryngoscore, validate the Laryngoscore, mini-Laryngoscore, and Clarysse's model for predicting difficult laryngeal exposure, and modify the Laryngoscore for improved prediction accuracy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

This study included 153 patients who underwent laryngeal microsurgery at a tertiary laryngology center and university hospital. Patients were evaluated using the 11 items of the Laryngoscore, mini-Laryngoscore, and Clarysse's model to predict difficult laryngeal exposure. Difficult laryngeal exposure was defined as the inability to view the anterior commissure through a rigid laryngoscope under counterpressure to the anterior neck. Descriptive statistics and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis were used to assess the diagnostic performance of the predictive models and variables, including sex.

RESULTS

The prevalence of difficult laryngeal exposure was significantly higher in men than in women, despite higher Laryngoscore values in females. The Laryngoscore, mini-Laryngoscore, and Clarysse's model demonstrated good diagnostic performance with C-indexes of 0.751, 0.727, and 0.783, respectively. Based on these findings, we proposed a modified Laryngoscore, including treatment history, interincisors gap, upper jaw dental status, thyro-mental distance, degree of neck flexion-extension, and sex, achieving a C-index of 0.835.

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion of sex in the Laryngoscore and related predictive models enhances the accuracy of predicting difficult laryngeal exposure. These findings support the inclusion of sex as a factor in future modifications of these models to improve their predictive performance.