Research Officer, State Health Systems Resource Centre - Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, INDIA.
Executive Director, State Health Systems Resource Centre - Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, INDIA.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2024 Jul-Sep;IX(3):228-231. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2024.043.
In this response, we seek to analyse and rebut the observations of Karpagam S using an understanding of the Kerala Health system and the general purpose of the Kerala Public Health Act (KPHA). The KPHA was crafted with a greater focus on a one-health and preventive approach. It does not seek to interfere in an individual's preferred choice of treatment, except in the case of public health emergencies. KPHA is not a standalone document, but a supporting tool to the existing Kerala Health Policy and various other health policies and programmes instrumental in improving the health and quality of life of the people of the State. The KPHA is intended to be an enforcement tool for legal provisions to ensure welfare maximisation of the society at large, and thus detailed discussions regarding actions to be taken beyond these legal provisions do not fall within the purview of the Act.
在本次回应中,我们将使用对喀拉拉邦卫生系统的理解以及对《喀拉拉邦公共卫生法案》(KPHA)的总体目标来分析和反驳 Karpagam S 的观点。KPHA 的制定更加注重于一种整体性和预防性的方法。它并不寻求干涉个人的治疗偏好,除非出现公共卫生紧急情况。KPHA 不是一个孤立的文件,而是对现有喀拉拉邦卫生政策和其他各种卫生政策和方案的支持工具,这些政策和方案有助于改善该邦人民的健康和生活质量。KPHA 旨在成为执行法律规定的工具,以确保整个社会的福利最大化,因此,超出这些法律规定的行动详细讨论不属于该法案的范围。