Goldshear Jesse Lloyd, Corsi Karen F, Ceasar Rachel Carmen, Ganesh Siddhi S, Simpson Kelsey A, Kral Alex H, Bluthenthal Ricky N
Res Sq. 2024 Aug 17:rs.3.rs-4758949. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4758949/v1.
Background The United States is currently experiencing a housing and homelessness crisis. In response, many cities have adopted policies of displacement that move unhoused people from place to place. Recent research indicates that these policies may have negative health impacts on unhoused people who use drugs. We sought to examine health risks associated with government-enforced displacement among unhoused people who inject drugs (PWID). Methods We interviewed a community-recruited sample of opioid-using PWID in Los Angeles, CA and Denver, CO between April 2021 and November 2022 (N = 472) about their demographic/socioeconomic characteristics, drug use patterns, housing status, government-enforced displacement including items discarded during displacements, and health risks. We constructed binomial generalized linear regression to examine the risk ratio of non-fatal overdose, and syringe and cooker/cotton sharing between four groups of participants: housed, unhoused and not displaced, unhoused and relocated voluntarily, and unhoused and displaced in the last three months. Results In the last 3 months, 52% of participants were unhoused and displaced by the government. Among those who were displaced, median number of government-enforced displacements was 3 with 69% reporting loss of syringes, 56% loss of naloxone, and 22% loss of buprenorphine medicine. In multivariate models, risk ratios for unhoused and displaced participants were higher for nonfatal overdose and cooker/cotton sharing as compared to housed participants. Risk ratios for syringe sharing amongst unhoused participants did not differ significantly. Conclusions Unhoused and displaced PWID experience elevated health risks. Ending the use of government-enforced displacement of unhoused PWID is essential to reducing health risk in this population.
背景 美国目前正经历住房和无家可归危机。作为应对措施,许多城市采取了驱赶政策,将无家可归者从一个地方转移到另一个地方。最近的研究表明,这些政策可能会对吸毒的无家可归者产生负面健康影响。我们试图研究在注射吸毒者(PWID)中与政府强制驱赶相关的健康风险。方法 2021年4月至2022年11月期间,我们对加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市和科罗拉多州丹佛市通过社区招募的使用阿片类药物的PWID样本(N = 472)进行了访谈,了解他们的人口统计学/社会经济特征、吸毒模式、住房状况、政府强制驱赶情况(包括驱赶期间丢弃的物品)以及健康风险。我们构建了二项式广义线性回归模型,以检验四组参与者(有住房者、无住房且未被驱赶者、无住房且自愿搬迁者、无住房且在过去三个月内被驱赶者)之间非致命过量用药、共用注射器和煮器/棉花的风险比。结果 在过去三个月中,52%的参与者无家可归且被政府驱赶。在那些被驱赶的人中,政府强制驱赶的中位数次数为3次,69%的人报告注射器丢失,56%的人报告纳洛酮丢失,22%的人报告丁丙诺啡药物丢失。在多变量模型中,与有住房的参与者相比,无家可归且被驱赶的参与者在非致命过量用药和共用煮器/棉花方面的风险比更高。无家可归参与者之间共用注射器的风险比没有显著差异。结论 无家可归且被驱赶的PWID面临更高的健康风险。停止对无家可归的PWID使用政府强制驱赶措施对于降低该人群的健康风险至关重要。