Pesebre Antonette Ramos, Nomura Masayoshi, Soliza Divina Yumul, Ruanphoo Purim, Kuriyama Moeko, Obuchi Tomoka, Nagae Mika, Tokiwa Shino, Nishio Kojiro, Hayashi Tokumasa
Urogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):180-183. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_113_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
In the past, transvaginal surgery, native tissue restoration, or obliterative methods have been used in the majority of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries. Since laparoscopy has gained popularity, other procedures have been created to provide additional POP repair alternatives. Laparoscopic technique offers many advantages compared to open or transvaginal surgery when it comes to anatomical and surgical outcomes, recurrence rates, and patient's acceptance. Furthermore, we encouraged incorporating different laparoscopic techniques into urogynecology training to attract young gynecologists. Based on our own clinical and surgical experience, we present various laparoscopic techniques for treating POP. We think that by giving patients a variety of surgical alternatives, we can treat them all more effectively.
过去,大多数盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术采用经阴道手术、自体组织修复或闭塞性方法。自从腹腔镜检查普及以来,人们创造了其他手术方法以提供更多的POP修复选择。在解剖学和手术效果、复发率及患者接受度方面,与开放手术或经阴道手术相比,腹腔镜技术具有许多优势。此外,我们鼓励将不同的腹腔镜技术纳入泌尿妇科培训,以吸引年轻妇科医生。基于我们自己的临床和手术经验,我们介绍了各种治疗POP的腹腔镜技术。我们认为,通过为患者提供多种手术选择,我们可以更有效地治疗所有患者。