• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜骶棘韧带悬吊术的后路入路

A Posterior Approach to Laparoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension.

作者信息

Kong Wei, Cheng Xinghan, Xiong Guangwu

机构信息

Women's and Children's Health Centre, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

JSLS. 2018 Apr-Jun;22(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00105.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2017.00105
PMID:29977109
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6020889/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension, as commonly performed, is associated with extensive stripping, high risk of intraoperative bleeding, and prolonged operative time. We explore the safety and feasibility of posterior laparoscopic approach sacrospinous ligament suspension (LPASLS) in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 9 patients with symptomatic POP treated intraoperatively with LPASLS at the Women's and Children's Health Centre, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, between November 2016 and July 2017. Regular follow-up was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation. Subjective cure was considered as the absence of any postoperative subjective symptoms, and objective cure was considered as a postoperative POP-Q grade of 0.

RESULTS

All operations were completed successfully. The operative time ranged from 90 to 140 (mean, 117.78 ± 20.01) minutes, and the mean suspension time was about 30 minutes. The intraoperative estimated blood loss ranged from 30 to 100 (range, 54.9 ± 24.2) mL, and pelvic vascular injury occurred in 1 patient. Postoperative sacrococcygeal pain occurred in 5 patients, and Visual Analog Scale scores ranged from 3 to 4 (mean, 3.4 ± 0.5). The symptom disappeared without any treatment after 3-4 d. Patients were followed up for 3-10 (mean, 6.3 ± 2.1) months, and the subjective and objective cure rates were both 100%.

CONCLUSION

LPASLS is safe and feasible and may be considered as an alternative approach to traditional laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension.

摘要

背景与目的

常规实施的腹腔镜骶棘韧带悬吊术存在广泛剥离、术中出血风险高及手术时间延长等问题。我们探讨后腹腔镜骶棘韧带悬吊术(LPASLS)治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2016年11月至2017年7月在重庆医科大学附属第三医院妇女儿童健康中心接受LPASLS手术治疗的9例有症状POP患者的临床资料。术后1、3和6个月进行定期随访。主观治愈定义为术后无任何主观症状,客观治愈定义为术后POP-Q分级为0级。

结果

所有手术均成功完成。手术时间为90至140(平均117.78±20.01)分钟,平均悬吊时间约为30分钟。术中估计失血量为30至100(平均54.9±24.2)毫升,1例患者发生盆腔血管损伤。5例患者术后出现骶尾部疼痛,视觉模拟评分3至4分(平均3.4±0.5)。3至4天后症状未经任何治疗自行消失。患者随访3至10(平均6.3±2.1)个月,主观和客观治愈率均为100%。

结论

LPASLS安全可行,可作为传统腹腔镜骶棘韧带悬吊术的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/895b415e9103/jls0201637010005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/c5d1b99b2d67/jls0201637010001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/bf610fefa6dd/jls0201637010002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/3df74b0d7db0/jls0201637010003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/f7a5ec349e03/jls0201637010004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/895b415e9103/jls0201637010005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/c5d1b99b2d67/jls0201637010001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/bf610fefa6dd/jls0201637010002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/3df74b0d7db0/jls0201637010003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/f7a5ec349e03/jls0201637010004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b79/6020889/895b415e9103/jls0201637010005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Posterior Approach to Laparoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension.腹腔镜骶棘韧带悬吊术的后路入路
JSLS. 2018 Apr-Jun;22(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00105.
2
Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带固定术与经阴道全子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗前位和前顶脱垂:手术结果和患者满意度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜下保留子宫的腹股沟韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Sacrospinofixation of Richter in 8 Points: Original Contribution of the Laparoscopic Column in the Visualization of the Sacrospinous Ligaments.8 点骶棘韧带固定术(Richter):腹腔镜柱在可视化骶棘韧带中的原创贡献。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7):1227-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 May 3.
5
Bilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation in pelvic organ prolapse: an observational study.双侧最小张力骶棘肌固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项观察性研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 May;188:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
6
[Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].经阴道高位骶子宫韧带悬吊术的长期疗效
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;52(6):363-368. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.06.002.
7
A new laparoscopic technique of inguinal ligament suspension for vaginal vault prolapse.一种新的腹腔镜腹股沟韧带悬吊带技术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.071. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
8
[Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].[使用传统器械行骶棘韧带固定术治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ期盆腔器官脱垂结局的前瞻性队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;52(6):369-373. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.06.003.
9
[Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].经腹-经阴道联合入路腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗Ⅳ度盆腔器官脱垂的中期疗效
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 25;54(3):160-165. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.03.004.
10
[Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].腹腔镜高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术联合宫颈切除术治疗育龄期重度子宫脱垂妇女
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;49(3):167-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes (10 Years) of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.骶棘韧带固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂修复的长期结局(10年)
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;12(16):1611. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161611.
2
Various Laparoscopic Techniques in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术中的各种腹腔镜技术。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):180-183. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_113_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
Surgical Outcomes and Feasibility of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation through Anterior Approach for Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation in pelvic organ prolapse: an observational study.双侧最小张力骶棘肌固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项观察性研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 May;188:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
2
Operative time required to perform sacrospinous ligament suspension.进行骶棘韧带悬吊术所需的手术时间。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Feb;289(2):233-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2996-4. Epub 2013 Aug 10.
3
A multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal mesh in the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
经阴道骶棘韧带前入路固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂女性的手术效果及可行性
J Midlife Health. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):280-284. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_224_23. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series.病例报告:经阴道单孔腹膜外腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术治疗顶端脱垂:单中心病例系列
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 29;10:1066622. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066622. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of modified sacrospinous ligament fixation the anterior vaginal wall path for pelvic organ prolapse: A feasibility report based on 50 patients.改良骶棘韧带固定术经阴道前壁路径治疗盆腔器官脱垂的临床疗效评估:基于50例患者的可行性报告
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 2;9:1010027. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010027. eCollection 2022.
一项比较骶棘韧带固定术和经阴道网片在子宫切除术后阴道穹窿脱垂治疗中的多中心、随机、前瞻性、对照研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;207(4):301.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
4
[Clinical anatomic study on ischial spinous fascia fixation].坐骨棘筋膜固定术的临床解剖学研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May;44(5):350-3.
5
Functional results and quality-of-life after bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for genital prolapse.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Jun;132(2):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.031. Epub 2006 May 30.