Suppr超能文献

接受或未接受迷走神经刺激疗法的长期癫痫发作结果

Long-Term Seizure Outcome With or Without Vagal Nerve Stimulation Therapy.

作者信息

Gill Sonia, Devlin Kathryn N, Yuan Hsiangkuo, Mintzer Scott, Skidmore Christopher, Wu Chengyuan, Sperling Michael R, Nei Maromi

机构信息

Jefferson Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (SG, SM, CS, MRS, MN), Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences (KND), Drexel University; Jefferson Headache Center (HY), Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (CW), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; and Inova Medical Group - Neurology (SG), Fairfax, VA.

出版信息

Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Dec;14(6):e200358. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200358. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare long-term seizure control in patients with long-term VNS (vagal nerve stimulator) stimulation (VNS-on) with those who discontinued VNS after >3 years (VNS-off).

METHODS

Patients with refractory epilepsy with VNS therapy for >3 years (and follow-up for >2 years after VNS discontinuation for VNS-off patients) were included. Patients with brain surgery <3 years after VNS were excluded. We compared the percentage of patients with ≥50% seizure reduction (50% responder rate) and change in seizure frequency within and between groups in follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-three VNS-on and 16 VNS-off patients were evaluated. VNS-on patients underwent stimulation for 9.7 years (mean). VNS-off patients had VNS treatment for 6.5 years (mean), discontinued treatment, then had additional 8.0 years (mean) follow-up. 50% responder rates were similar between groups (VNS-on: 54.5% vs VNS-off at last-on: 37.5%, = 0.26; vs VNS-off at the last follow-up: 62.5%, = 0.60). VNS-on patients had a significant reduction in seizure frequency at the last follow-up compared with baseline (median [Mdn] = -4.5 seizures/month, interquartile range [IQR] = 14.0, 56% reduction, = 0.013). VNS-off patients also showed significant seizure reduction while still continuing VNS therapy (Mdn = -1.0 seizures/month, IQR = 13.0, 35% reduction, = 0.020) and, after discontinuing therapy, at the last follow-up compared with baseline (Mdn = -3.2, IQR = 11.0, 52% reduction, = 0.020). The 2 groups were comparable in seizure frequency change both at the last-on visit (absolute change, = 0.62; relative change, = 0.50) at the last follow-up (absolute change, = 0.67; relative change, = 0.76).

DISCUSSION

Patients who discontinued VNS therapy and those who continued therapy had similar response during active treatment and similar long-term outcomes, suggesting that factors such as the natural disease course and/or medication treatment strongly affect long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景与目的

比较长期接受迷走神经刺激器(VNS)刺激(VNS开启)的患者与VNS治疗超过3年后停用VNS(VNS关闭)的患者的长期癫痫控制情况。

方法

纳入接受VNS治疗超过3年(VNS关闭的患者在VNS停用后随访超过2年)的难治性癫痫患者。排除VNS治疗后3年内接受脑部手术的患者。我们比较了随访期间两组内及两组间癫痫发作减少≥50%(50%缓解率)的患者百分比以及癫痫发作频率的变化。

结果

评估了33例VNS开启患者和16例VNS关闭患者。VNS开启患者平均接受刺激9.7年。VNS关闭患者平均接受VNS治疗6.5年,然后停止治疗,随后平均随访8.0年。两组的50%缓解率相似(VNS开启组:54.5%,最后一次开启时VNS关闭组:37.5%,P = 0.26;最后一次随访时VNS关闭组:62.5%,P = 0.60)。与基线相比,VNS开启患者在最后一次随访时癫痫发作频率显著降低(中位数[Mdn]= -4.5次/月,四分位数间距[IQR]= 14.0,降低56%,P = 0.013)。VNS关闭患者在仍继续VNS治疗时癫痫发作也显著减少(Mdn = -1.0次/月,IQR = 13.0,降低35%,P = 0.020),并且在停止治疗后,与基线相比在最后一次随访时(Mdn = -3.2,IQR = 11.0,降低52%,P = 0.020)。两组在最后一次开启就诊时(绝对变化,P = 0.62;相对变化,P = 0.50)以及最后一次随访时(绝对变化,P = 0.67;相对变化,P = 0.76)的癫痫发作频率变化具有可比性。

讨论

停用VNS治疗的患者和继续治疗的患者在积极治疗期间反应相似,长期预后也相似,这表明自然病程和/或药物治疗等因素对长期预后有强烈影响。

相似文献

1
2
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.
3
Vagus nerve stimulation for focal seizures.迷走神经刺激治疗局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 14;7(7):CD002896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002896.pub3.
5
Yoga for epilepsy.用于癫痫治疗的瑜伽
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 5;10(10):CD001524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001524.pub3.
8
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验