• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷走神经刺激的长期疗效:65 例难治性癫痫患者 VNS 治疗>10 年的回顾。

Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation over time: review of 65 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS > 10 years.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Mar;20(3):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.042. Epub 2011 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.042
PMID:21296622
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Studies have reported improved seizure control with increased duration of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) but are prone to methodological biases. We analyzed the efficacy of VNS over time in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE) who underwent VNS therapy 10 or more years.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 65 consecutive patients (29 females) who underwent VNS therapy ≥ 10 years. The mean age at VNS insertion was 30.0 years. Forty-four adults (≥ 18 years; 67.7%) and 21 children (32.3%) were included. Seizure frequency and antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens were recorded prior to VNS and, following VNS insertion, at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and every 2 years thereafter.

RESULTS

The mean duration of VNS therapy for this group was 10.4 years, and the mean decrease in seizure frequency at last follow-up was 76.3%. The mean reduction in seizures at 6 months and years 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 years was 35.7, 52.1, 58.3, 60.4, 65.7, 75.5, and 75.5%, respectively. Seizure frequency was significantly reduced from baseline at each of the recorded intervals (P<0.001). There was a trend toward increased AED burden in the latter years of the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Following a "ramp-up" and accommodation period throughout the initial 24 months after VNS implantation, seizure control improved slightly over the subsequent years of therapy and eventually stabilized. Variation in seizure frequency, however, was common, and frequent changes in AED regimens or stimulation parameters were likely an important and possibly synergistic component of seizure control.

摘要

目的

已有研究报道,延长迷走神经刺激(Vagus nerve stimulation,VNS)的刺激时长可以改善癫痫发作的控制,但这些研究容易受到方法学偏倚的影响。我们分析了接受 VNS 治疗 10 年以上的耐药性癫痫(treatment-resistant epilepsy,TRE)患者中,VNS 随时间推移的疗效。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 65 例连续接受 VNS 治疗≥10 年的患者(29 例为女性)。VNS 植入时的平均年龄为 30.0 岁。纳入 44 例成人(≥18 岁;67.7%)和 21 例儿童(32.3%)。在 VNS 植入前和植入后 6 个月、1 年、2 年以及此后每 2 年,记录癫痫发作频率和抗癫痫药物(antiepileptic drug,AED)方案。

结果

该组患者的 VNS 治疗平均持续时间为 10.4 年,最后一次随访时的癫痫发作频率平均降低 76.3%。6 个月、1 年、2 年、4 年、6 年、8 年和 10 年时的癫痫发作平均减少率分别为 35.7%、52.1%、58.3%、60.4%、65.7%、75.5%和 75.5%。与基线相比,在所有记录的时间段内癫痫发作频率均显著降低(P<0.001)。在随访后期,AED 治疗负担呈增加趋势。

结论

在 VNS 植入后的最初 24 个月的“适应期”之后,随着“逐渐适应期”的结束,癫痫控制在随后的治疗年数中略有改善,最终稳定下来。然而,癫痫发作频率的变化很常见,频繁改变 AED 方案或刺激参数可能是癫痫控制的一个重要且可能具有协同作用的因素。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation over time: review of 65 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS > 10 years.迷走神经刺激的长期疗效:65 例难治性癫痫患者 VNS 治疗>10 年的回顾。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Mar;20(3):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.042. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
2
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫:迷走神经刺激术联合或不联合后续切除术。
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
3
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction.儿童难治性癫痫的迷走神经刺激:迷走神经刺激的作用不止于降低癫痫发作频率。
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
4
The efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy: practical experience at a Turkish tertiary referral center.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫儿童的疗效:土耳其三级转诊中心的实践经验。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Jul;14(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
5
Impact of failed intracranial epilepsy surgery on the effectiveness of subsequent vagus nerve stimulation.颅内癫痫手术失败对后续迷走神经刺激有效性的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1210-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182230ae3.
6
Vagus nerve stimulation has a positive effect on mood in patients with refractory epilepsy.迷走神经刺激对难治性癫痫患者的情绪有积极影响。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 May;114(4):336-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.11.016. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
7
Cumulative effect of vagus nerve stimulators on intractable seizures observed over a period of 3years.迷走神经刺激器对难治性癫痫发作的累积效应观察3年
Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Jul;18(3):299-302. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 23.
8
Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy after failed epilepsy surgery.癫痫手术后失败的迷走神经刺激治疗的长期结果。
Seizure. 2011 Apr;20(3):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
9
Treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy with vagus nerve stimulation -- review of 45 cases.迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫——45 例病例回顾。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Dec;124(24):4184-8.
10
Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases.迷走神经刺激术治疗难治性癫痫患儿:141例连续病例系列研究
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 May;7(5):491-500. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.PEDS10505.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term efficacy and predictors of vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a multicenter cohort study.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫的长期疗效及预测因素:一项多中心队列研究
Acta Epileptol. 2025 Sep 1;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42494-025-00220-8.
2
Total corpus callosotomy for an adult patient with progressive myoclonic epilepsy associated with dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy: illustrative case.成年进行性肌阵挛癫痫伴齿状核红核苍白球路易体萎缩患者的胼胝体全切术:病例说明
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2025 Jul 7;10(1). doi: 10.3171/CASE2576.
3
Sleep links hippocampal propensity for epileptiform activity to its viscerosensory inputs.
睡眠将海马体产生癫痫样活动的倾向与其内脏感觉输入联系起来。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Mar 13;19:1559529. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1559529. eCollection 2025.
4
Reduction of generalized tonic-clonic seizures following vagus nerve stimulation therapy: CORE-VNS Study 24-month follow-up.迷走神经刺激疗法后全身强直阵挛性发作的减少:CORE-VNS研究24个月随访
Epilepsia. 2025 Jul;66(7):2307-2314. doi: 10.1111/epi.18371. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
5
Innovative approaches in the treatment-resistant depression: exploring different therapeutic pathways.难治性抑郁症的创新治疗方法:探索不同的治疗途径。
Geroscience. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01615-8.
6
The physiology, anatomy and stimulation of the vagus nerve in epilepsy.癫痫中迷走神经的生理学、解剖学及刺激作用
J Physiol. 2025 Apr;603(8):2201-2217. doi: 10.1113/JP287164. Epub 2025 Mar 9.
7
Practical Considerations for the rapid titration of VNS.迷走神经刺激快速滴定的实际考量
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024 Dec 13;29:100734. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100734. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Changes in Response Inhibition, Visual Anticipation and Verbal Fluency During Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.耐药性癫痫患者迷走神经刺激治疗期间反应抑制、视觉预期和言语流畅性的变化
Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70176. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70176.
9
Long-Term Seizure Outcome With or Without Vagal Nerve Stimulation Therapy.接受或未接受迷走神经刺激疗法的长期癫痫发作结果
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Dec;14(6):e200358. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200358. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
10
Long-Term Outcome in Adult Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Submitted to Vagus Nerve Stimulation.接受迷走神经刺激的耐药性癫痫成年患者的长期预后
Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 26;14(7):639. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070639.