Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Aug;30(8):e14910. doi: 10.1111/cns.14910.
To compare the changes in brain network topological properties and structure-function coupling in patients with complete spinal cord injury (CSCI) and incomplete spinal cord injury (ICSCI), to unveil the potential neurobiological mechanisms underlying the different effects of CSCI and ICSCI on brain networks and identify objective neurobiological markers to differentiate between CSCI and ICSCI patients.
Thirty-five SCI patients (20 CSCI and 15 ICSCI) and 32 healthy controls (HCs) were included in the study. Here, networks were constructed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging to analyze functional connectivity (FC) and diffusion tensor imaging for structural connectivity (SC). Then, graph theory analysis was used to examine SC and FC networks, as well as to estimate SC-FC coupling values.
Compared with HCs, CSCI patients showed increased path length (Lp), decreased global efficiency (E), and local efficiency (E) in SC. For FC, ICSCI patients exhibited increased small-worldness, clustering coefficient (C), normalized clustering coefficient, and E. Also, ICSCI patients showed increased C and E than CSCI patients. Additionally, ICSCI patients had reduced SC-FC coupling values compared to HCs. Moreover, in CSCI patients, the SC network's Lp and E values were significantly correlated with motor scores, while in ICSCI patients, the FC network's C, E, and SC-FC coupling values were related to sensory/motor scores.
These results suggest that CSCI patients are characterized by decreased efficiency in the SC network, while ICSCI patients are distinguished by increased local connections and SC-FC decoupling. Moreover, the differences in network metrics between CSCI and ICSCI patients could serve as objective biological markers, providing a basis for diagnosis and treatment strategies.
比较完全性脊髓损伤(CSCI)和不完全性脊髓损伤(ICSCI)患者脑网络拓扑性质和结构-功能连接的变化,揭示 CSCI 和 ICSCI 对脑网络产生不同影响的潜在神经生物学机制,并确定客观的神经生物学标志物来区分 CSCI 和 ICSCI 患者。
本研究纳入了 35 名 SCI 患者(20 名 CSCI 和 15 名 ICSCI)和 32 名健康对照者(HCs)。在这里,使用静息态功能磁共振成像构建网络来分析功能连接(FC),并使用弥散张量成像构建结构连接(SC)网络。然后,使用图论分析来评估 SC 和 FC 网络,并估计 SC-FC 耦合值。
与 HCs 相比,CSCI 患者的 SC 网络的路径长度(Lp)增加,全局效率(E)和局部效率(E)降低。对于 FC,ICSCI 患者的小世界属性、聚类系数(C)、标准化聚类系数和 E 增加。此外,ICSCI 患者的 C 和 E 均高于 CSCI 患者。此外,ICSCI 患者的 SC-FC 耦合值低于 HCs。此外,在 CSCI 患者中,SC 网络的 Lp 和 E 值与运动评分显著相关,而在 ICSCI 患者中,FC 网络的 C、E 和 SC-FC 耦合值与感觉/运动评分相关。
这些结果表明,CSCI 患者的 SC 网络效率降低,而 ICSCI 患者的局部连接增加和 SC-FC 解耦。此外,CSCI 和 ICSCI 患者之间网络指标的差异可以作为客观的生物学标志物,为诊断和治疗策略提供依据。