Wang Juan, Liu Shushang, Chen Haixiang, Luo Jialin, Xu Guanghui, Feng Xiangying, Yang Xuewen, Yang Jianjun, Gang Ji
Department of Digestive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University.
National Key Laboratory for Integrated Prevention and Treatment of Digestive System Tumors, Xi'an.
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):686-696. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002062.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TLTG with the overlap technique to LATG in patients with advanced Siewert III Esophagogastric Junction Cancer and upper and middle third gastric cancer.
This single-center RCT enrolled 292 patients with the mentioned cancers, randomly assigned to TLTG overlap ( n =146) or LATG ( n =146) groups. Data on demographics, pathology, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, recovery parameters, and 3-year survival were collected. Main outcome: postoperative complications within 30 days. Secondary outcomes: 3-year disease-free and overall survival.
TLTG versus LATG: TLTG had shorter incision, faster flatus/defecation, reduced analgesia, less opioid use, and shorter hospital stay. Similar operation time, anastomosis time, blood loss, and lymph node harvest. TLTG had a lower overall post-op complication rate (P=0.047) and no significant difference in serious complications ( P =0.310). Variances in anastomotic stenosis occurrence at 3 months. No rehospitalization or mortality at 30 days. No significant differences in 3-month disease-free survival ( P =0.058) or overall survival ( P =0.236).
The overlap method for anastomosis in TLTG is safe and feasible for advanced middle-upper-third gastric cancer, with positive short-term outcomes. This technique has the potential to be the preferred esophagojejunostomy approach in TLTG.
This trial has been registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900025667 (registration date: 4 September 2019).
本研究旨在比较采用重叠技术的经胸腹腔镜联合胃切除术(TLTG)与腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术(LATG)治疗晚期Siewert III型食管胃交界癌及胃中上段癌患者的疗效和安全性。
本单中心随机对照试验纳入了292例上述癌症患者,随机分为TLTG重叠组(n = 146)和LATG组(n = 146)。收集了患者的人口统计学、病理学、术中变量、术后并发症、恢复参数及3年生存率等数据。主要结局:30天内的术后并发症。次要结局:3年无病生存率和总生存率。
TLTG与LATG对比:TLTG的切口更短、胃肠排气/排便更快、镇痛需求减少、阿片类药物使用量更少且住院时间更短。手术时间、吻合时间、失血量及淋巴结清扫数量相似。TLTG的总体术后并发症发生率更低(P = 0.047),严重并发症无显著差异(P = 0.310)。3个月时吻合口狭窄发生率存在差异。30天内无再次住院或死亡情况。3个月时无病生存率(P = 0.058)或总生存率(P = 0.236)无显著差异。
TLTG中的重叠吻合方法对于晚期胃中上段癌是安全可行的,具有良好的短期结局。该技术有可能成为TLTG中首选的食管空肠吻合方法。
本试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册:ChiCTR1900025667(注册日期:2019年9月4日)。