• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定和优先考虑优化髋部骨折护理旅程中过渡的建议:一项混合方法概念映射研究的结果。

Identifying and prioritizing recommendations to optimize transitions across the care journey for hip fractures: Results from a mixed-methods concept mapping study.

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0307769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307769. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0307769
PMID:39186524
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11346730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals who experience a hip fracture have numerous care transitions. Improving the transition process is important for ensuring quality care; however, little is known about the priorities of different key interest groups. Our aim was to gather recommendations from these groups regarding care transitions for hip fracture.

METHODS

We conducted a concept mapping study, inviting persons with lived experience (PWLE) who had a hip fracture, care partners, healthcare providers, and decision-makers to share their thoughts about 'what is needed to improve care transitions for hip fracture'. Individuals were subsequently asked to sort the generated statements into conceptual piles, and then rate by importance and priority using a five-point scale. Participants decided on the final map, rearranged statements, and assigned a name to each conceptual cluster.

RESULTS

A total of 35 participants took part in this concept mapping study, with some individuals participating in multiple steps. Participants included 22 healthcare providers, 7 care partners, 4 decision-makers, and 2 PWLE. The final map selected by participants was an 8-cluster map, with the following cluster labels: (1) access to inpatient services and supports across the care continuum (13 statements); (2) informed and collaborative discharge planning (13 statements); (3) access to transitional and outpatient services (3 statements); (4) communication, education and knowledge acquisition (9 statements); (5) support for care partners (2 statements); (6) person-centred care (13 statements); (7) physical, social, and cognitive activities and supports (13 statements); and (8) provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviours (8 statements).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study findings highlight the importance of person-centred care, with active involvement of PWLE and their care partners throughout the care journey. Many participant statements included specific ideas related to continuity of care, and clinical knowledge and skills. This study provides insights for future interventions and quality improvement initiatives for enhancing transitions in care among hip fracture populations.

摘要

背景

经历髋部骨折的个体有许多护理交接。改善交接过程对于确保高质量的护理至关重要;然而,对于不同关键利益相关群体的优先事项知之甚少。我们的目的是从这些群体中收集关于髋部骨折护理交接的建议。

方法

我们进行了概念映射研究,邀请有髋部骨折经历的患者(PWLE)、护理伙伴、医疗保健提供者和决策者分享他们对“改善髋部骨折护理交接需要什么”的想法。随后,要求个人将生成的陈述归入概念堆,并使用五分制对重要性和优先级进行评分。参与者决定最终的图谱,重新排列陈述,并为每个概念集群分配一个名称。

结果

共有 35 名参与者参与了这项概念映射研究,其中一些人参与了多个步骤。参与者包括 22 名医疗保健提供者、7 名护理伙伴、4 名决策者和 2 名 PWLE。参与者选择的最终图谱是一个 8 个聚类的图谱,以下是聚类标签:(1)在整个护理连续体中获得住院服务和支持(13 个陈述);(2)知情和协作性出院计划(13 个陈述);(3)获得过渡和门诊服务(3 个陈述);(4)沟通、教育和知识获取(9 个陈述);(5)照顾者的支持(2 个陈述);(6)以人为本的护理(13 个陈述);(7)身体、社会和认知活动和支持(13 个陈述);(8)提供者的知识、技能、角色和行为(8 个陈述)。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了以人为本的护理的重要性,让 PWLE 和他们的护理伙伴在整个护理过程中积极参与。许多参与者的陈述包括与连续性护理以及临床知识和技能相关的具体想法。这项研究为未来的干预措施和质量改进举措提供了思路,以改善髋部骨折人群的护理交接。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba76/11346730/55dd45658155/pone.0307769.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba76/11346730/78137fa024f2/pone.0307769.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba76/11346730/55dd45658155/pone.0307769.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba76/11346730/78137fa024f2/pone.0307769.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba76/11346730/55dd45658155/pone.0307769.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying and prioritizing recommendations to optimize transitions across the care journey for hip fractures: Results from a mixed-methods concept mapping study.确定和优先考虑优化髋部骨折护理旅程中过渡的建议:一项混合方法概念映射研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0307769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307769. eCollection 2024.
2
Recommendations made by patients, caregivers, providers, and decision-makers to improve transitions in care for older adults with hip fracture: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.患者、护理人员、医护人员和决策者提出的改善老年髋部骨折患者照护交接的建议:加拿大安大略省的一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02943-6.
3
Factors related to screening for problem gambling among healthcare and social service providers in Ontario, Canada: A concept mapping study.加拿大安大略省医疗保健和社会服务提供者中与问题赌博筛查相关的因素:一项概念映射研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):791-802. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12909. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Patient and caregiver experiences on care transitions for adults with a hip fracture: a scoping review.患者和照顾者在成人髋部骨折护理转衔方面的体验:范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Dec;42(24):3549-3558. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1595181. Epub 2019 May 12.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
Use of an electronic wellness instrument in the integrated health and social care of older adults: a group concept mapping study.利用电子健康仪器实现老年人健康与社会护理一体化:群组概念映射研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11320-5.
7
Identifying health and healthcare priorities in rural areas: A concept mapping study informed by consumers, health professionals and researchers.确定农村地区的健康和医疗保健重点:基于消费者、卫生专业人员和研究人员的概念映射研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 13;22(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01163-1.
8
Examining "success" in post-hip fracture care transitions: a strengths-based approach.探讨髋部骨折后护理交接中“成功”:基于优势的方法。
J Interprof Care. 2012 May;26(3):205-11. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.645090. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
9
"Did I do as best as the system would let me?" Healthcare professional views on hospital to home care transitions.“我是否尽了系统允许我做到的最好?”医疗保健专业人员对医院到家庭护理过渡的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1649-56. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2169-3. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
10
Head and neck cancer treatment outcome priorities: A multi-perspective concept mapping study.头颈部癌症治疗结果的优先事项:一项多视角概念映射研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294712. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The meaning of continuity of care from the perspective of older people with complex care needs-A scoping review.从有复杂护理需求的老年人的角度出发,对连续性护理的意义进行探讨的范围综述。
Geriatr Nurs. 2024 Jan-Feb;55:354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.12.016. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
Patient-clinician digital health interventions for the hip fracture population: a scoping review.患者-临床医生数字健康干预措施在髋部骨折人群中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09784-y.
3
Effectiveness of integrated care for elderly patients with hip fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
老年髋部骨折患者综合护理的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Geriatr Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;49:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
4
Rehabilitation interventions for persons with hip fracture and cognitive impairment: A scoping review.髋部骨折合并认知障碍患者的康复干预措施:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 15;17(8):e0273038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273038. eCollection 2022.
5
Bundled Payments for Hip Fracture Surgery Are Associated With Improved Access, Quality, and Health Care Utilization, but Higher Costs for Complex Cases: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.髋部骨折手术捆绑支付与医疗可及性、质量及医疗保健利用的改善相关,但复杂病例成本更高:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jan 1;37(1):19-26. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002459.
6
Recommendations made by patients, caregivers, providers, and decision-makers to improve transitions in care for older adults with hip fracture: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.患者、护理人员、医护人员和决策者提出的改善老年髋部骨折患者照护交接的建议:加拿大安大略省的一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02943-6.
7
Community Reintegration After Rehabilitation for Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.髋部骨折康复后的社区再融入:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug;103(8):1638-1650.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.12.007. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
8
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
9
A comprehensive multidisciplinary care pathway for hip fractures better outcome than usual care?髋部骨折的综合多学科护理路径是否优于常规护理?
Injury. 2021 Jul;52(7):1819-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.044. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
10
Integrated hip fracture care pathway (IHFCP): reducing complications and improving outcomes.综合髋部骨折护理路径(IHFCP):减少并发症,改善结局。
Singapore Med J. 2022 Aug;63(8):439-444. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021041. Epub 2021 Apr 19.