Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
UMCG Comprehensive Transplant Center, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anal Chem. 2024 Sep 10;96(36):14393-14404. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01766. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
Bile's potential to reflect the health of the biliary system has led to increased attention, with proteomic analysis offering deeper understanding of biliary diseases and potential biomarkers. With the emergence of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), bile can be easily collected and analyzed. However, the composition of bile can make the application of proteomics challenging. This study systematically evaluated various trypsin digestion methods to optimize proteomics of bile from human NMP livers.
Bile was collected from 12 human donor livers that were accepted for transplantation after the NMP viability assessment. We performed tryptic digestion using six different methods: in-gel, in-solution, S-Trap, SMART, EasyPep, and filter-aided sample purification, with or without additional precipitation before digestion. Proteins were analyzed using untargeted proteomics. Methods were assessed for total protein IDs, variation, and protein characteristics to determine the most optimal method.
Methods involving precipitation surpassed crude methods in protein identifications (4500 vs 3815) except for in-gel digestion. Filtered data (40%) resulted in 3192 versus 2469 for precipitated and crude methods, respectively. We found minimal differences in mass, cellular components, or hydrophobicity of proteins between methods. Intermethod variability was notably diverse, with in-gel, in-solution, and EasyPep outperforming others. Age-related biological comparisons revealed upregulation of metabolic-related processes in younger donors and immune response and cell cycle-related processes in older donors.
Variability between methods emphasizes the importance of cross-validation across multiple analytical approaches to ensure robust analysis. We recommend the in-gel crude method for its simplicity and efficiency, avoiding additional precipitation steps. Sample processing speed, cost, cleanliness, and reproducibility should be considered when a digestion method is selected for bile proteomics.
胆汁具有反映胆道系统健康状况的潜力,因此受到了越来越多的关注,蛋白质组学分析可以更深入地了解胆道疾病和潜在的生物标志物。随着常温机械灌注(NMP)的出现,胆汁可以很容易地被收集和分析。然而,胆汁的组成使得蛋白质组学的应用具有挑战性。本研究系统评估了各种胰蛋白酶消化方法,以优化来自人 NMP 肝脏胆汁的蛋白质组学分析。
从 12 例接受 NMP 生存能力评估后进行移植的人类供体肝脏中收集胆汁。我们使用 6 种不同的方法进行胰蛋白酶消化:胶内、溶液内、S-Trap、SMART、EasyPep 和过滤辅助样品纯化,在消化前或不进行沉淀。使用无靶向蛋白质组学分析蛋白质。评估方法的总蛋白 ID、变化和蛋白质特征,以确定最佳方法。
除胶内消化外,沉淀方法的蛋白鉴定数量(4500 个 vs 3815 个)超过了粗方法。过滤数据(40%)分别比沉淀和粗方法的 3192 个和 2469 个多。我们发现方法之间蛋白质的质量、细胞成分或疏水性差异很小。方法间的变异性差异很大,胶内、溶液内和 EasyPep 方法优于其他方法。年龄相关的生物学比较显示,年轻供体的代谢相关过程上调,而老年供体的免疫反应和细胞周期相关过程上调。
方法之间的可变性强调了在多个分析方法之间进行交叉验证以确保稳健分析的重要性。我们建议使用胶内粗方法,因为它简单高效,避免了额外的沉淀步骤。在选择胆汁蛋白质组学的消化方法时,应考虑样品处理速度、成本、清洁度和重现性。