ICES (Campbell, Bell, Urbach, Paterson, Stukel, Gill, Baxter, Wilton, Gomez), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Queen's University; Department of Ophthalmology (Campbell), Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Hotel Dieu Hospital site, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Ophthalmology (El-Defrawy), University of Toronto; Department of Ophthalmology (El-Defrawy), Kensington Eye Institute; Department of Medicine (Bell), University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Bell, Paterson, Stukel), University of Toronto; Department of Medicine (Bell), Sinai Health System; Department of Surgery (Urbach, Baxter, Gomez), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Geriatric Medicine (Gill), Queen's University; Division of Geriatric Medicine (Gill), Providence Care Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; Departments of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Surgical Oncology (Irish), University Health Network; Cancer Care Ontario (Irish); Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Baxter, Gomez), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AU; Unity Health Toronto (Gomez), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2024 Aug 25;196(28):E965-E972. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.240414.
Public funding of cataract surgery provided in private, for-profit surgical centres increased to help mitigate surgical backlogs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada. We sought to compare the socioeconomic status of patients who underwent cataract surgery in not-for-profit public hospitals with those who underwent this surgery in private for-profit surgical centres and to evaluate whether differences in access by socioeconomic status decreased after the infusion of public funding for private, for-profit centres.
We conducted a population-based study of all cataract operations in Ontario, Canada, between January 2017 and March 2022. We analyzed differences in socioeconomic status among patients who accessed surgery at not-for-profit public hospitals versus those who accessed it at private for-profit surgical centres before and during the period of expanded public funding for private for-profit centres.
Overall, 935 729 cataract surgeries occurred during the study period. Within private for-profit surgical centres, the rate of cataract surgeries rose 22.0% during the funding change period for patients in the highest socioeconomic status quintile, whereas, for patients in the lowest socioeconomic status quintile, the rate fell 8.5%. In contrast, within public hospitals, the rate of surgery decreased similarly among patients of all quintiles of socioeconomic status. During the funding change period, 92 809 fewer cataract operations were performed than expected. This trend was associated with socioeconomic status, particularly within private for-profit surgical centres, where patients with the highest socioeconomic status were the only group to have an increase in cataract operations.
After increased public funding for private, for-profit surgical centres, patient socioeconomic status was associated with access to cataract surgery in these centres, but not in public hospitals. Addressing the factors underlying this incongruity is vital to ensure access to surgery and maintain public confidence in the cataract surgery system.
在加拿大安大略省,为了缓解 COVID-19 大流行期间的手术积压,公共资金开始用于私人盈利性手术中心的白内障手术。我们旨在比较非营利性公立医院和私人盈利性手术中心接受白内障手术患者的社会经济地位,并评估在为私人盈利性中心提供公共资金后,社会经济地位差异是否有所减少。
我们对 2017 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月期间在加拿大安大略省进行的所有白内障手术进行了一项基于人群的研究。我们分析了在扩大私人盈利性中心公共资金期间,在非营利性公立医院接受手术的患者和在私人盈利性手术中心接受手术的患者之间的社会经济地位差异。
总体而言,在研究期间共进行了 935729 例白内障手术。在私人盈利性手术中心内,在资金变更期间,社会经济地位最高的五分之一患者的白内障手术率上升了 22.0%,而社会经济地位最低的五分之一患者的手术率下降了 8.5%。相比之下,在公立医院内,所有社会经济地位五分之一的患者的手术率都呈相似下降趋势。在资金变更期间,实际进行的白内障手术比预期少了 92809 例。这种趋势与社会经济地位有关,特别是在私人盈利性手术中心内,社会经济地位最高的患者是唯一白内障手术增加的群体。
在为私人盈利性手术中心提供更多公共资金后,患者的社会经济地位与这些中心的白内障手术机会有关,但与公立医院无关。解决这种不一致的根本原因对于确保手术机会和维持公众对白内障手术系统的信心至关重要。