• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调强质子治疗计划剂量校准点与患者特定质量保证之间的差异对剂量分布的影响。

The Impact of Dose Calibration Point Differences Between the Treatment Plan and Patient-specific Quality Assurance in Passive Scattering Proton Beam Therapy.

机构信息

Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2024 Sep-Oct;38(5):2478-2483. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13718.

DOI:10.21873/invivo.13718
PMID:39187337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11363771/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Passive scattering proton beam therapy (PSPT) is performed by taking actual measurements of all pre-designated fields in a treatment plan followed by appropriate adjustments to the prescribed dose. For this reason, it is necessary to ensure precision management of the measurements (patient-specific calibration) in the administration of a planned dose. Therefore, this study investigated the impact on dose distribution in treatment planning when the patient calibration point differs from the normalized point in a treatment plan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 16 cases were selected, where the patient calibration point and normalized point did not match, and the normalized point used in the treatment plan was changed to the patient calibration point using a treatment planning system (VQA ver. 2.01, HITACHI). At this point, the displacement of the relative dose at the isocenter was estimated as an error owing to the difference compared to the patient calibration point.

RESULTS

Overall, the error was within the range of ±1.5%, with the exception of orbit cases. Calibrated points also tended to be lower than the normalized points in the treatment plan. In terms of treatment sites, a greater deviation was observed for head cases. Cases with a large deviation in sites other than the head were attributed to poor flatness within the radiation field owing to a narrower opening of the patient collimator.

CONCLUSION

Dose measurement errors in PSPT due to differing calibration points were generally within ±1.5%, with higher deviations observed in head treatments because of complex structures and narrow collimator openings. A γ analysis for significant deviations showed a 98.7% passing rate, suggesting limited overall impact. It is important to select stable calibration points in dosimetry to ensure high precision in dose administration, particularly in complex treatment areas.

摘要

背景/目的:被动散射质子束治疗(PSPT)是通过对治疗计划中的所有预定射野进行实际测量,并对规定剂量进行适当调整来完成的。因此,有必要确保在给予计划剂量时对测量(患者特异性校准)进行精确管理。因此,本研究探讨了在治疗计划中患者校准点与计划中的归一化点不同的情况下,对剂量分布的影响。

患者和方法

共选择了 16 例患者,患者校准点与归一化点不匹配,使用治疗计划系统(HITACHI 的 VQA ver. 2.01)将计划中的归一化点更改为患者校准点。此时,由于与患者校准点的差异,将在等中心点的相对剂量的位移估计为误差。

结果

总体而言,误差在±1.5%的范围内,除了眼眶病例。校准点也倾向于低于计划中的归一化点。就治疗部位而言,头部病例的偏差较大。头部以外部位的偏差较大的病例归因于由于患者准直器开口较窄而导致辐射场内的平坦度较差。

结论

由于校准点不同,PSPT 中的剂量测量误差通常在±1.5%以内,由于结构复杂和准直器开口较窄,头部治疗的偏差较大。对于显著偏差的γ分析显示 98.7%的通过率,表明总体影响有限。在剂量学中选择稳定的校准点对于确保剂量给予的高精度非常重要,特别是在复杂的治疗区域。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Dose Calibration Point Differences Between the Treatment Plan and Patient-specific Quality Assurance in Passive Scattering Proton Beam Therapy.调强质子治疗计划剂量校准点与患者特定质量保证之间的差异对剂量分布的影响。
In Vivo. 2024 Sep-Oct;38(5):2478-2483. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13718.
2
Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.被动散射质子治疗中 TOPAS 蒙特卡罗系统的实验验证。
Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):121719. doi: 10.1118/1.4828781.
3
Evaluation of Delta Anatomy in 3D Patient-Specific IMRT Quality Assurance.三维个体化调强放疗质量保证中 Delta 解剖结构的评估。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820945816. doi: 10.1177/1533033820945816.
4
Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.光斑尺寸和束流整形装置对笔形束扫描质子治疗计划质量的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.368. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.用于前列腺调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗前剂量验证的电子射野影像装置(EPID)剂量测定的临床经验。
Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3921-30. doi: 10.1118/1.2230810.
6
Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.调强放射治疗(IMRT)交付和质量保证(QA)中 MLC 校准误差的生物学后果。
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1917-24. doi: 10.1118/1.3692177.
7
Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.使用COMPASS对立体定向容积调强弧形放疗的三维剂量学进行定量评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jan 7;16(1):5128. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5128.
8
Three-dimensional gamma criterion for patient-specific quality assurance of spot scanning proton beams.用于点扫描质子束患者特定质量保证的三维伽马准则
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):381–388. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5683.
9
Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy.基于机器日志文件的蒙特卡罗模拟个体化患者质量保证用于线扫描质子放射治疗。
Med Phys. 2023 Nov;50(11):7139-7153. doi: 10.1002/mp.16747. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
10
External beam patient dose verification based on the integral quality monitor (IQM) output signals.基于积分质量监测器(IQM)输出信号的外照射患者剂量验证。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020 Mar 25;6(3):035014. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab5f55.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of Proton Therapy - Current Status and Future Directions.质子治疗综述——现状与未来方向
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jun;6(2):164-176. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1149. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer.常规与适度低分割质子治疗前列腺癌后的急性毒性和患者报告症状评分。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Jun;69(2):198-207. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.551. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
Monitor unit prediction model for wobbling proton therapy with ridge filters.带脊滤波器的摆动质子治疗的监测单位预测模型。
Med Phys. 2021 Dec;48(12):8107-8116. doi: 10.1002/mp.15277. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
4
Proton therapy - Present and future.质子治疗——现状与未来。
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Jan 15;109:26-44. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
5
The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.MD安德森质子治疗系统。
Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4068-83. doi: 10.1118/1.3187229.
6
A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams.一种用于被动散射质子放射治疗束的监测单位计算方法。
Med Phys. 2008 Nov;35(11):5088-97. doi: 10.1118/1.2992055.
7
Long-term results of stereotactic proton beam radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas.
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Feb;90(2):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.004. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
8
Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.使用被动散射法产生的质子治疗束准直器散射的蒙特卡罗研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jan 21;53(2):487-504. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/2/014. Epub 2007 Dec 28.
9
Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams.用于高能质子束治疗眼部肿瘤的喷嘴的蒙特卡罗模拟。
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Nov 21;50(22):5229-49. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/22/002. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
10
Monitor unit calculations for range-modulated spread-out Bragg peak fields.射程调制扩展布拉格峰场的监测单元计算
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Sep 7;48(17):2797-808. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/17/305.